Democracy socialism dictator etc, those are not basic political systems they are secondary systems.

 

There are only two basic political systems.

 

Let's overpopulate the world to death creating wars starvation poverty crime etc worldwide, killing millions and millions of people and enslaving billions of people in total despair.

 

Or have enough but not too many people in the world where you don't create the wars starvation poverty crime etc.

 

Which ones yours!

Oh. This again. The joy.

 

I pick the hidden 3rd option, which by a stroke of luck is the one all of humanity uses.

your pick is the first one, which all humanity uses, then you try to lie!

No it's not, you gibbering fool.

No it's not, you gibbering fool.

you lier

Pithy. Thanks.

 

Tell you what, for a bit of a laugh you tell me how overpopulation leads directly to crime.

Pithy. Thanks.

 

Tell you what' date=' for a bit of a laugh you tell me how overpopulation leads directly to crime.[/quote']

 

and people kill over that and thats a crime

 

but we know your law kill all the indians and take everything they got and then say killing me and taking my stuff is against the law.

 

and if you ttry to say thats not your law, when you going to give everything back to the indians!

Ah, you are mistaking me for the 19c American railroad tycoons and settlers. I'm actually English, and have very little impact on historical territory disputes.

 

I think you are confusing cause and effect. Overpopulation did not cause the American settlers to oust the native Americans, nor was overpopulation the reason that Settlers came to America in the first place. The main reasons the events happened is lodged in humanity's greed, the desire to accumulate and prosper. People took the land because they wanted it, and they had to power to take it.

 

Mankind's capacity for violence and need to gardener power is omnipresent in all society's, and it's not linked to population. Take Kane and Able, one had a wife the other wished to possess and he killed to gain it. It's a story that repeats itself through history. The base wants and desires drive humanity, we are no more complex than that.

::edit::on second thoughts, that was obviously the point that you were trying to make, and thus my post was a bit dumb. hmm, no delete button. how annoying. well, i guess ill just waffle for a bit and hope that noone notices, or that a mod deletes this post. la-de-dah, toddle doo, trumby-dumby-dooo. ::edit::

Blah blah blah

If you want to make some sort of coherent political point, you might want to consider a combination (or indeed all) of these tactical moves:

 

1) Learn how to use the apostrophe,

 

2) Find out what "demagoguery" means, then avoid it,

 

3) Learn about sentence structure,

 

4) Check your historical and geo-political facts before drawing sweeping conclusions.

 

 

Please also note that attempting to stealth your threads by posting them in the wrong forum is not going to work, and will only aggravate the staff further.

and people kill over that and thats a crime

 

but we know your law kill all the indians and take everything they got and then say killing me and taking my stuff is against the law.

 

and if you ttry to say thats not your law' date=' when you going to give everything back to the indians![/quote']

 

What is your law? That overpopulation is bad? If so, get rid of yourself please, you are using up MY planet.

 

Thank You,

Nice touch John, in both senses of the word.

Democracy socialism dictator etc' date=' those are not basic political systems they are secondary systems.

 

There are only two basic political systems.

 

Let's overpopulate the world to death creating wars starvation poverty crime etc worldwide, killing millions and millions of people and enslaving billions of people in total despair.

 

Or have enough but not too many people in the world where you don't create the wars starvation poverty crime etc.

 

Which ones yours![/quote']

So you mean we can kill millions now instead and then not have too many people? Why didn't anyone tell me about this? We should call Hardin! Everyone pick a number between 1 and 1000, Now everyone who didn't get 583 please report to you nearest government building to be "reincoporated into the earth"!

Actually, the government can control births with laws. Look at China

Of course, but this would not bring the population of the world into millions in any kind of near future.

My opinion is that we will invent new technologies to produce more resources, the more people, and combined with more education, there is a tendency towards more invention.

 

The larger our connected planet becomes in population and creativity, the faster everyone benefits from it.

 

Eventually when we overpopulate on this planet, we will go to other planets.

 

If we H-Bombed Europa, and projected into Mars, meanwhile, we H-Bombed the surface of Mars, we could make a habitable planet.

 

Europa is mainly water, while the surface of Mars contains alot of iron oxide, if we were to nuke the surface, the iron and the oxygen would seperate, creating a extremely hot, but breathable atomosphere.

 

Then comes Europa,

 

Europa, or a chunk of it would provide enough water to cover the entire planet of Mars, or however much we need in order for it to be habitable.

 

THe fact that Mars is farther away from the sun could be taken care of by Fusion energy, we could keep the planet warmer with our own suns, and we could produce an endless supply of tritium through the particle smashers they use to study sub-atomic nuclei.

 

There you have it, that's what I believe will happen.

I can understand how higher population can lead to greater crime on an absolute level, but I wonder if an increase in population would lead to diminishing crime rate, i.e. decrease in crime per capita as population increases??

_________________

http://members.fortunecity.com/ku20/oldindex.html