Swansont,

You can delete my account if you want. Dr. Pan at WKU knows what I think.

Still, not sure if conserving momentum by absorbing some electrons would allow the nuclei

of gaseous molecules in the upper atmosphere to avoid catastrophic entropy due to the lack of

energy/matter where there is little pressure and the temperature is -40 C or more.

Can't prove it and it's not my problem. But if it can reduce co2, don't care any more. Have gotten

the message that doing nothing is preferable to trying something Why I am proud to be an

American disabled Veteran. I love living in a country where having imitative is frowned upon.

By the way, there is one small catch, the vacuum chamber needs to be something like a hydraulic cylinder.

The more molecules, the more energy, etc. And since expansion needs to be limited to be efficient, a

hydraulic cylinder will convert kgf/cm^2 into vacuum, could be measured as a drop in the temperature of gases

or just the loss of pressure or both. That conservation thingy.

Why has this been missed ? Conventional vacuum pumps transfer angular momentum so it creates a wind chill effect.

That and the hydraulic cylinder might need a charge to give water molecules increased kinetic potential.

Am not sure if Dr. Pan or anyone else will find this interesting but am burned out on it myself.

 

!

Moderator Note

STOP REOPENING CLOSED TOPICS.

 

I honestly do not know how to make this any clearer for you. You have been given many, many chances to adhere to the forum rules while discussing this topic and each and every time you fail. Enough. If you do this again, we will ban you.