Jump to content

Question about Lorentz Contraction


Johnny5

Recommended Posts

  • 2 weeks later...

It's both because the manner in which it was derived does not depend on whether the space between two points is filled with matter. If you think about it some, you will see that it wouldn't make any sense if the answer were not "both". Take two planets, separated by a distance L0 in their mutual rest frame. Then Buck Rogers goes zipping by in his starship with speed v in a direction parallel to the line joining the centers of the planets. How far apart are the planets in Buck's frame? Well, if the answer to your question were not "both", then the answer to my question would depend on whether or not there is a giant ruler between the two planets, which is absurd.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's both because the manner in which it was derived does not depend on whether the space between two points is filled with matter. If you think about it some, you will see that it wouldn't make any sense if the answer were not "both". Take two planets, separated by a distance L0[/sub'] in their mutual rest frame. Then Buck Rogers goes zipping by in his starship with speed v in a direction parallel to the line joining the centers of the planets. How far apart are the planets in Buck's frame? Well, if the answer to your question were not "both", then the answer to my question would depend on whether or not there is a giant ruler between the two planets, which is absurd.

 

Perfectly answered Tom, thank you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.