cosmos0 Posted January 20, 2013 Share Posted January 20, 2013 Hello, I just wrote the following manuscript: http://fr.calameo.com/books/000145333298884fdee60. By deriving the standard formula of the luminosity distance, I obtain a time varying speed of light (from light propagation). Therefore, a new definition of the luminosity distance is provided. Given this new definition, the Hubble constant must remain unchanged in order to fit the supernovae data. Your comments and ideas are welcome... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alpha2cen Posted January 20, 2013 Share Posted January 20, 2013 Hello, I just wrote the following manuscript: http://fr.calameo.com/books/000145333298884fdee60. By deriving the standard formula of the luminosity distance, I obtain a time varying speed of light (from light propagation). Therefore, a new definition of the luminosity distance is provided. Given this new definition, the Hubble constant must remain unchanged in order to fit the supernovae data. Your comments and ideas are welcome... This is a calculated result and it's model. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now