Because that is when an equivalent inertia-term disappears from the electromagnetic force equation in integral form, since photons are inertia-less and the speed of light is the inverse of the square root of the permeability and permitivity of space. Traveling at the speed of light, or faster, is no different than traveling at any speed. Relativity only applies to specific conditions.

Because that is when an equivalent inertia-term disappears from the electromagnetic force equation in integral form, since photons are inertia-less and the speed of light is the inverse of the square root of the permeability and permitivity of space. Traveling at the speed of light, or faster, is no different than traveling at any speed. Relativity only applies to specific conditions.

 

Could you explain this?

It is noted as a space in permeability and permitivity. Traveling at the speed of light, or faster, is no different than traveling at any speed. Relativity only applies to specific conditions.Please go through this link. Then u'll definetly understand this.

 

http://ccpm.com/electrody.pdf

Because that is when an equivalent inertia-term disappears from the electromagnetic force equation in integral form, since photons are inertia-less and the speed of light is the inverse of the square root of the permeability and permitivity of space. Traveling at the speed of light, or faster, is no different than traveling at any speed. Relativity only applies to specific conditions.

 

When traveling at any speed, a light shone in your direction of travel will travel at a speed of c relative to you.

If you could travel at the speed of light, as like any other speed, light would still outpace you at a speed of c, which doesn't make sense.

 

So are you claiming that the speed of light isn't invariant, and my first statement is incorrect? This does not agree with experimental evidence.