If there are apples and no oranges, what else are there and none of?

Edited March 23, 201213 yr by questionposter

there are apple trees and no orange trees

there are grapes and no olives

there is happiness and no obesity?

Edited March 23, 201213 yr by imatfaal

 

there are apple trees and no orange trees

 

 

Yes

 

 

 

there are grapes and no olives

 

 

Nope

 

 

 

there is happiness and no obesity?

 

 

Yes

There are sheep but no rams.

 

There are sheep but no rams.

 

 

yep

 

There are sheep but no rams.

 

 

yep

 

This should throw people off though:

 

"There is rich but no impoverished"

 

There is also asking but no answering

Edited March 23, 201213 yr by questionposter

qp - this is an entirely new set of green glass doors isn't it? otherwise I am totally confused. I am pretty confused if it is new - but I will work on it...

 

 

I can only think that there are words but no syllables; that there are doubles but no quadrupples

 

qp - this is an entirely new set of green glass doors isn't it? otherwise I am totally confused. I am pretty confused if it is new - but I will work on it...

 

 

I can only think that there are words but no syllables; that there are doubles but no quadrupples

 

 

No it's not a new valley, think time-wise.

 

 

In old English but English nonetheless, rich was "fullsome" and asking was "beseeching"

 

Edited March 27, 201213 yr by questionposter