http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2009/10/oreilly_dawkins_or_what_happen.php

 

I have some respect for Bill-O and I do at least consider him honest. It's just hard to believe he actually believes his arguments in this piece. It is also irritating how the 30 second exchanges will not allow someone like Dawkins to properly trash Bill.

I don't know why anyone would bother going on that show. He doesn't do interviews, he just invites people on to be yelled at for a couple minutes.

I have some respect for Bill-O and I do at least consider him honest.

Simply the fruits of a con's labors.

Dawkins needs someone to remind him to smile. He looks so unhappy.

 

Echoes of many threads I've seen on SFN, particularly the idea that if biologists can't explain the origin of life, nothing they say matters. Hey physicists, figure out what caused the big bang yet? Nope? Well then, who needs Newtonian mechanics?! Unless you can explain the gestalt nothing you say can be trusted!