Jump to content

Genetic Engineering


Guest kerazi_dayzi

Recommended Posts

Guest kerazi_dayzi

I'm doing a huge project on the pro's of genetic engineering for "super immunity". One of the points we are arguing is that eventually the human race will be immune to various diseases due to natural selection/survival of the fittest, and that we are simply speeding up the process. However I've been unable to find even an estimate as to how long genetic therapy or even directly splicing the DNA and changing the components around takes before it is considered sucessful or complete. This is probably due to the lack of actual experimentation, but i would like to at least have a time range to place in my argument. Also if you happen to know anybody with experience in this field that wouldn't mind a few questions over the net that i can use in this project as well, that would be awsome to know. Thanks for your time and possible help! :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One of the points we are arguing is that eventually the human race will be immune to various diseases due to natural selection/survival of the fittest, and that we are simply speeding up the process. FONT'] :)

 

why do i see many-a-problem with this notion?

 

but you might want to check out some of the genetic research the MIT is currently running for starters

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One of the points we are arguing is that eventually the human race will be immune to various diseases due to natural selection/survival of the fittest, and that we are simply speeding up the process.

 

the problem with that pov is that it neglects to notice that the viruses are evolving more rapidly than we are, natural selection only has a weak influence on humans now, and it also neglects the functioning of the immune system. Furthermore, the human population is now so large, that it is effectively in stasis - it would take aeons for say, a gene which provided resistance against HIV to spread through the entire population (if it ever did), so the initial argument is wrong, and there is no need to argue against it by saying we are simply speeding up that process.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 8 months later...

Few immunities or residences have been results from mutation, examples being cystic fibrosis and collear and sickle cell anemia to malaria, but these mutations are most likely results from first the presence of the disease. With genetic engineering to produce a better immune response you would have to have a wide variety of targets and responses to foreign agents, and would most likely cause an effect that would halt the spontaneous development through mutations among the humans you test or treat with this, and there spawn or course……iam sure they would be ok with that if you also gave them UV vision or increased memory or something

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.