Jump to content

dumb question


psi20

Recommended Posts

I don't get this. Do you take the root first? Or take the power first?

 

(-4)^(2/10). Do you take the tenthroot first? If so, you would run into imaginary numbers right? But if you square it first, then you don't have imaginary numbers?

Do you always simplify the fraction? So do you turn it into

(-4)^(1/5)?

 

Each yields a different answer. One's imaginary, one's positive, one's negative.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for clearing up about the imaginary number part, but I still don't get the part about the negative and positive.

 

(-4)^(2/10) = tenthroot(-4)^(2)=tenthroot16

 

(-4)^(2/10) = (-4)^(1/5) = fifthroot(-4)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As an example, lets look at the equation:

 

(x-1)2 = x2.

 

It's pretty obvious if you multiply it out that x = 0.5.

 

However, if you take the square root of both sides...

 

x - 1 = x

 

1 = 0.

 

This doesn't work, does it?

 

It's a similar problem to the one above, in that you have to get the right sign on the square root, because it can be either positive or negative.

 

If we change it to

 

x - 1 = - x (-x being the square root of x2)

 

2 x = 1

 

x = 0.5, as required.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think your analogy works well, in that mine is just an evaluation and yours is an equation. In equations, you would to +/- for even roots, but in evaluations you don't. Like the square root of 4 is just 2. There is no -2. But if x^2 = 4, x = +/- 2.

 

Let me try to clear up my question.

 

In p^(m/n),

would you do (nth-root of p) to the m-th

or would you do nth-root of (p to the mth)?

 

In p^(mn/mo),

would you do (m*nth-root of p) to the m*o-th

or would you do m*nth-root of (p to the m*o-th)

or would you do (nth-root of p) to the o-th

or would you do nth-root of (p to the o-th)

 

It can yield different answers. And it shouldn't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

psi20 said in post # :

I don't think your analogy works well, in that mine is just an evaluation and yours is an equation. In equations, you would to +/- for even roots, but in evaluations you don't. Like the square root of 4 is just 2. There is no -2. But if x^2 = 4, x = +/- 2.

 

I don't see why there is an elementary difference between equations and 'evaluations'. The square root of 4 is ALWAYS +-2, it's just not expressed verbally for simplicity (you'd probably not get away with saying it's 2 at a higher level).

 

Furthermore, my analogy does hold, because it's precisely the same thing at work.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

psi20 said in post # :

Oh, that's not what my math teacher told me. But it seems that sometimes math teachers teach things wrong. So the square root of 4 IS +/- 2? That changes everything.

 

Maths is all about being correct, and to say the square root of 4 is 2 (as opposed to A square root) just isn't right.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Think about the meaning of 'square root'. If you try and find the square root or some number n, it's another number p such that p^2 = n.

 

For n = 4, there exist two such numbers: -2 and +2. It's all a matter of definition.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.