Jump to content

Physics Without "Charge" or "antimatter"


lfmorgan

Recommended Posts

The concept of charge as currently best defined is a math-coherent myth. In terms of detailed deterministic local event mechanics, it is a relative measure of the excess or deficit of binding elecrons between the two objects said to exhibit atraction or repulsion. An object with a realtive excess of binding electrons, A, placed next to an object B with a relative deficit, will have more electons pulsing in and out of it to mark energy state-- and depending on relative electron pulsing energy states, there is a naturally tendency to equalize. The energy state gradient at the general location in space-time determines the degree of electron exchange required for adjacency equilibrium.

 

The typical atom is pulsing a huge number of elecrons in and out to mark energy state. In molecular visible matterm, there is an equilibrium of real time exchange of elecrons between adjacent atoms where by electron clsosed loop orbit paths may go around a number of atoms in an S curve or figure 8 patterns as required for the stablity of a given molecule as a spinning/vibrating volume of space time. All electrons comng from and going back to atoms must be assumed to communicate with the nuclei of the atoms involved. It is therefore proper to see that electrons sharing at the atomiv nucleus level is routinely present in large numbers-- for all visible matter formed of molecules, It iis the molecule that provides for instrumented measure of local pulse event energy state-- in terms of measured frequency of pulsing. The so called atomic spectra are really molecular sprectra where each distinct molecule must be bound as an emergent whole by two or more atoms --that are constantly emitting and absorbing the binding energy electrons per the energy state measure at the molecule level ---which energy state is measured direcly by frquency of pulsing, f. That is E = nhf, where the value of n is never measurement parsed. At the molecular pulse event level n = 1/h, to explain why f = E. If we let the electron have a constant mass of h grams and the minumum energy quantum be h ergs, then h-symmetry allows problematic (gross averaging) prediction but leaves us mechanicall blind at the single pulse event level---at which level we are hopelessly visually confused between mass and energy!

 

For a completion of Einstein's theory where the concepts of charge and antimatter are not needed, go to

 

http://disney.go.com

Link to comment
Share on other sites

PS. thanks alot swansont, i was just posting this in its origional location when you moved it, somehow crashed FF.

 

Sorry about that, but I'd hate to add any fuel to possible complaints about material being moved to speculations when other speculative material isn't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.