http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=3132857754400064872

 

Notice the collapse sequence. The same collapse sequence laid out in the NIST report:

 

1) North penthouse collapses

2) Seconds pass

3) South penthouse begins to collapse

4) The rest of the building collapses

 

Have you ever seen a controlled demolition occur in such a fashion? Or is this video more consistent with an internal structural failure?

dont these normally go in pseudoscience?

do we have to go over this yet again?

This is the craziest stuff I have ever heard.

...The OP was saying that it's /not/ a collision, therefore, no, we have nothing to go over. It's only when someone tries to say that the unordinary collapse order there was controlled that we get a problem.

do we have to go over this yet again?

 

This is a thread about substantive information congruent with the official FEMA report. Much like the thread about a computer simulation the collapse of the twin towers (in a way also consistent with the official report), the 9/11 conspiracists don't seem to want to touch this one.