wolfson Posted December 12, 2003 Share Posted December 12, 2003 Thats weird, i suppose it's been 4 years for me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aommaster Posted December 12, 2003 Author Share Posted December 12, 2003 yeah, i know, i've heard that in the uk u can actually do triple science Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wolfson Posted December 12, 2003 Share Posted December 12, 2003 Yer I did it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aommaster Posted December 12, 2003 Author Share Posted December 12, 2003 how many lesson a week did you do. I think its nine, cause i do 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wolfson Posted December 12, 2003 Share Posted December 12, 2003 Yer 3 of each, oh and I would personally say that chemical engineering is concerned with the design and construction and also operation of chemical plants and machinery used in chemical process, well least that what my friends that are qualified chemical engineers do, and another thing i would also start to read A-level chemistry and Math's books, it will come in very useful, with your G.C.S.E. exams and also when you start your a-levels. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aommaster Posted December 12, 2003 Author Share Posted December 12, 2003 oh THANX ALOT, thanx for the advice Keep it up! bye Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blike Posted December 12, 2003 Share Posted December 12, 2003 My friend's father is a chemical engineer. He works for NASA playing with rocket fuel all day. He loves his job. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VendingMenace Posted December 12, 2003 Share Posted December 12, 2003 I think skye hit it pretty much on the head. That is, chemical engineers take known processes and try to make them useful or more effecient. Chemists try to discover new ways of doing things and novel chemicals. Of course this is totally an arbitrary definition and rarely do you find it stricktly followed. That is, many chemists try to adapt known processes to do what they want them to or they are interested in making something practicle and many times chemical engineers have to do some fundamental research along the way in order to get things working well. But as a general rule of thumb the above definition will work. So in order to decide whether or not you want to be a chemical engineer or a chemist, you must decide what sounds most fun to you. Making up new stuff, or trying to make "old" stuff usefull. Of course you gotta look at the pay scales and schooling involved. Engineers have the advantage that they get paid alot for their bachelors degrees. But scientists have the advantage that they can do whatever they want. That is to say, no one else really determines their research direction. WHereas engineers usually belong to firms and are not allowed to do anyting that would not be profitable. But then again to be a chemist and do what you want, you must have a Ph.D. and then you are looking at 5-7 more years after college. Anyways, i guess you just kinda have to decide whether or not the freedom to chase whatever interests you is worth an additional 5-7 years. Or perhaps you really enjoy a difficult effeciency problem. Many people do. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wolfson Posted December 12, 2003 Share Posted December 12, 2003 You should not say that you can only progress in chemistry by means of a Ph.D, there are alternatives, i.e. masters with research......, gives you enough practive to conclude a "chemists ideal". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now