grav Posted May 17, 2006 Share Posted May 17, 2006 Although the motions of galaxies toward or away from us will indeed cause a shift in the light we observe, nothing has so far been demonstrated that directly relates this to the full extent of the shift, and measurements based on this may be erroneous. Our own sun is not moving toward or away from us but it nevertheless produces a redshift of about one part in a million billion. Extremely far away galaxies show a redshift that is smaller for their distance than nearby ones. If the entire redshift were a result of pure motion, then this would mean that the universe is not only expanding, but that this expansion is accelerating, although the mechanism which would cause such an acceleration is so far undetermined. There is, however, another option available to us regarding a large portion of the redshift. Light may lose energy as it travels through space to neutrino pressure. This will have the effect of a reduction in the frequency of light which becomes more pronounced the further it travels through space, regardless of its direction. This energy loss is in proportion to its current energy, so all frequencies will shift with the same ratio for the same distance. For small distances, as from nearby galaxies, the total energy will not change much and the redshift will appear to be proportional to the distance. For larger distances, however, the total energy is diminished considerably, so that light loses less energy in proportion. Details on how this is determined and much more can be found at http://grav1.bravehost.com . Here, one will find that many common phenomena are intimately related. The paper describes the relationship between the gravitational constant, neutrino pressure, CMB pressure, the Hubble constant, and Planck length and determines precise values for each. Simple and uncompromised formulas specifically indicate neutrino pressure as the source of gravity and redshift. Some experiments and observations that can test these assertations are also laid out. Please take a few minutes to refer to this site. Any and all feedback is appreciated. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Klaynos Posted May 17, 2006 Share Posted May 17, 2006 sorry I don't have time atm to read your site, but I can point you at some other ineresting reading related to this... http://www.newtonphysics.on.ca/Chromosphere/CHROMOSPHERE.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
timo Posted May 17, 2006 Share Posted May 17, 2006 I admit I didn´t go to the link you gave. But can you elaborate on the neutrino pressure (for example telling what it is) and the mechanism by which light loses energy to it here? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SmallIsPower Posted May 25, 2006 Share Posted May 25, 2006 I'm glad there are alternatives to "dark energy". It's an observed phenoma, calling it "dark energy" assumes its an actual force. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SmallIsPower Posted July 5, 2006 Share Posted July 5, 2006 A few problems with this idea too.... Neutrino pressure is at least as strong as the electromagnetic force? How come we haven't seen this before? When we observe an electron and proton in proximity neutrino pressure creates the appearance of a force as powerful as the electromagnetic force... Yet when we observe an electron and neutron in proximity neutrino pressure creates the appearance of a force as weak as the gravitational force... Huh? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now