Read this statement

People who say things like: "how can there be an issue with water shortage when two thirds of the earth surface is water?" Aren't worth listening to, and so should be exempt from the right to express an opinoin.

And disscuss...

what's to discuss? You're statement is fact, and nobody can argue against it.

 

although, I do think we should take all the dumb people who think like that, and hook them all up to an iceberg up north. Together, they can swim to the Middle East and other places with water shortages. Surely a few million people can drag an iceberg...

A few months ago I definately would have agreed with your proposal Tree, but after comments like this...

As you have never seen one of these intermediate creatures alive you can not prove without doubt that what you see in the fossil records is not one of the creatures either side of an intermediate creature. E.g. dinosaur to bird. The fossil in my view is either likely to be one or the other and not an intermediate state.

... I'm more prone to support the idea to test whether or not it is possible to beat the stupidity outa someone.

People who say things like: "how can there be an issue with water shortage when two thirds of the earth surface is water?" Aren't worth listening to' date=' and so should be exempt from the right to express an opinoin.[/indent']

QUOTE]

 

Just to be awkward then I suggest the question is not at all stupid.

 

The answer is : There is not a water shortage as such. It is the wrong type in the wrong place at the wrong time. The problem is with usage and distribution, not quantity. A simple answer to a not so stupid question.

that seems like a pretty obvious thing, that people should have learned in middle school - I sure did.