1 hour ago, Ser Gio said:

Regarding nucleosynthesis: if nucleosynthesis was based on more elementary material constituents, we are simply postponing the question: where does their synthesis come from? Personally, I prefer to think that energy is an essential building block in the construction of matter rather than imagining that these building blocks appeared from 'nothing,' or rather, from a "singularity."

As for the rest, I don't intend to dwell on Lockyer's theory. I have presented a calculation that should, in my opinion, pique the curiosity of anyone who has studied physics at any advanced level...

But I'm not forcing anyone to find it interesting. Some may find it interesting, or not. That's their choice.

Energy of radiation, say, can be converted to the rest mass of constituents of matter, certainly. But energy on its own is meaningless.

2 hours ago, Ser Gio said:

I don't intend to dwell on Lockyer's theory. I have presented a calculation that should, in my opinion, pique the curiosity of anyone who has studied physics at any advanced level...

I don’t see a calculation, and as I’ve explained, such discussion doesn’t fit within our rules.