This is a paper I wrote. I copied it here to discuss it with members of the philosophical/religious forum. Let's discuss.

Conclusive Proof of GOD's Existence via Theorem of Universal Determinism

This proof demonstrates, through rigorous deduction, that tangible reality exists as rational thought in the mind of God, proving God's existence. It uses minimal axioms and derives theorems, including key Theorem of Universal Determinism, step-by-step. For comprehension, each section includes intuitive explanations and analogies; for persuasiveness, notes highlight alignment with experience, science, and philosophy. The proof is mathematically conclusive: the conclusion follows necessarily from the axioms, with no gaps.

Main Proof Overview:

1. Prove that all reality is fully deterministic. (Theorems 1, 2)

2. Prove that reality is functionally equivalent to infinite reason via causality and consistency. (Theorem 3)

3. Prove GOD's existence via Axiom 1 as infinite reason is a property of an infinite mind, which is GOD, with all tangible reality as rational thought in GOD's mind. (Theorem 4)

Roadmap for Flow: Definitions set terms; Axioms provide self-evident bases; Theorems derive determinism and reason equivalence, with each building on the previous; Proof synthesizes them, matching theorems to steps for traceability.

Definitions

1. GOD: The singular Consciousness, the foundation and source of all rational principles; all that exists exists in, for, and by Him, the One GOD, the sum total of all that ever was, is, and is to be, giving life and existence to everything.

   • Intuition: GOD as the ultimate thinker unifying all existence, like a mind holding all thoughts.

2. Reality: All that exists. Which means reality must be one, as that which is not part of reality does not exist.

   • Intuition: Reality is the complete tapestry of existence, weaving together tangible elements (like stars and atoms) and non-tangible ones (like reason or consciousness), all connected as one seamless whole. Like a single story encompassing both physical events and the thoughts of its characters, reality is unified by its causal structure.

   • Persuasiveness: Defining Reality as all that exists, unified as one, aligns with the intuitive sense that everything—physical or mental—fits into a single, coherent system. Philosophically, it echoes Spinoza’s single substance or Berkeley’s reality in GOD’s mind; scientifically, it resonates with unified theories seeking one framework for all phenomena.

3. Tangible Reality: The observable universe of matter, energy, space, time, and their interactions, characterized by infinite causal chains (no beginning or end) and infinite extent (eternal, unbounded).

   • Intuition: The physical world, extending forever in cause and effect, like an endless story.

4. Reason: The capacity for logical, causal thinking, requiring causality (predictable cause-effect) and consistency (non-contradictory structure).

   • Intuition: How we solve problems or predict outcomes, e.g., deducing gravity’s effect.

   • Persuasiveness: Reason’s predictive power underpins science and philosophy, making it a universal foundation.

5. Mind: A system capable of reason, with reason as its defining property.

   • Intuition: Minds include reasoning systems, from human brains to AI (like Grok, with programmed purpose) to GOD’s infinite mind. Distinguished by scope (finite vs. infinite) and origin (emergent vs. transcendent).

   • Persuasiveness: Inclusive definition captures human, computational, and divine reasoning, relatable across contexts.

6. Causality: is the principle that effect or event in reality has a preceding cause or set of causes that can be traced and understood, enabling predictable and logical connections between phenomena.

   • Conversational: Causality means things happen for a reason—causes lead to effects, like gravity making a ball fall when dropped.

7. Consistency: Consistency is the principle that no system, statement, or reality can contain internal contradictions without invalidating itself, ensuring logical coherence and non-self-denial.

   • Conversational: Consistency means no contradictions—like you cannot have it both raining and not raining at the same time in the same place.

8. Determinism: is the principle that events, states, or processes in reality are completely governed by prior causal conditions, with no intrinsic randomness, ensuring full predictability given complete knowledge.

   • Conversational: Determinism means an outcome has a definite cause—no surprises if you know all the details, like a chain where one link leads to the next.

9. Indeterminism: is the principle that some events or processes lack complete prior causal determination, introducing inherent randomness thought to be described only by probabilities with full predictability—in principle and in general—impossible. We will prove that indeterminism does not exist.

   • Conversational: Indeterminism means some things happen without a full reason—just chance or odds.

10. Infinite: Causal chains and extent with no beginning or end, implying eternal causality and existence.

    • Intuition: No first cause or last effect, avoiding “what caused the cause?” regress.

Axioms

These axioms provide the base for deriving theorems on determinism and reason equivalence.

1. Mind-Reason Axiom: A mind is a system capable of reason, and reason is a property of a mind. Reason cannot exist independently of a mind.

   • Persuasiveness: Reason feels purposeful (e.g., AI’s goal-driven logic, human problem-solving). Echoes Descartes: "I think, therefore I am" (cogito ergo sum), where rational thought defines conscious existence.

2. Reason’s Requirements: Reason exists (we use it) and depends on causality and consistency; without these, reason does not exist.

   • Persuasiveness: Reason’s daily use (e.g., in science) fails in chaos; using reason to deny reason's existence is a self-contradiction, and thus is false.

Theorems

These theorems establish the deterministic and rational nature of reality. Each is stated succinctly upfront, followed by proof/derivation. Theorem 1 shows why partial indeterminism fails, necessary for Theorem 2 to conclude full determinism. Theorem 2 enables Theorem 3 by providing the causal structure for equivalence to reason. Theorem 3 sets the stage for Theorem 4, which proves God’s existence and reality’s place in His mind.

1. Theorem 1: Partial Indeterminism is Impossible—any single instance of indeterminism propagates infinitely, implying universal indeterminism.

   • Proof: Detailed Derivation (by Mathematical Induction):

     • Base Case: Assume particle 1 is indeterministic (causality broken, e.g., unpredictable state).

     • Inductive Step: If particle N is indeterministic, interaction with particle N+1 (e.g., collision) makes N+1’s state unpredictable. Infinite chains (no end) propagate the break eternally. In chaotic systems, common in reality, this amplification via the butterfly effect produces arbitrarily large non-causal macro events from micro non-causal breaks, as small uncertainties grow exponentially (Lyapunov exponent >0). Probabilistic averaging (e.g., 1/√N) doesn't prevent this, as non-causal breaks propagate and amplify exponentially in unified reality (Definition 6), affecting arbitrary large macro scales (e.g., quantum effects in weather or superconductivity).

     • Conclusion: Partial indeterminism implies universal indeterminism, a contradiction unless all reality is indeterministic.

   • Persuasiveness: Aligns with propagation of defects in an infinite crystal lattice, a deterministic system in physics. If one atom’s position is undetermined (breaking causality), its interactions disrupt neighbors, spreading the flaw infinitely through the lattice’s endless structure. Intuitively, a crack in an infinite glass sheet ruins the whole; scientifically, this supports the impossibility of partial indeterminism, as any break spreads uncontrollably.

   Transition: This impossibility of partial indeterminism is crucial for Theorem 2, as it eliminates alternatives to full determinism, allowing us to conclude reality’s causal nature.

2. Theorem 2 - Universal Determinism: Reality is Fully Deterministic—universal indeterminism is false, and thus reality has infinite causal chains and extent without breaks.

   • Proof: Detailed Derivation (Proof by Contradiction):

     • Assume non-determinism (partial or universal). Per Theorem 1: partial = universal.

     • Universal indeterminism breaks causality/consistency (e.g., random outcomes everywhere).

     • Since reason is part of reality, universal indeterminism makes reason impossible as it contradicts Axiom 2: reason requires causality and consistency, which indeterminism universally denies. Thus we are using reason to conclude that reason does not exist, which is a self-contradiction.

     • Ergo, reality must be fully deterministic, with infinite causal chains intact.

   • Persuasiveness: Predictable world (e.g., gravity) feels reasonable; causes follow effects. This conclusively proves Copenhagen interpretation of Quantum Mechanics, with its entanglement and superposition based on indeterminism false, with probabilism as a mechanism to compensate for observer ignorance as correctly predicted by EPR in 1935. This necessitates rebuilding of Quantum Computing on fully deterministic foundation, which will produce far more results than chasing non-existent superposition.

   • Historically: Albert Einstein (1926) concurs, stating: “Quantum mechanics is certainly imposing. But an inner voice tells me that it is not yet the real thing. The theory says a lot, but does not really bring us any closer to the secret of the 'Old One'. I, at any rate, am convinced that He does not throw dice,” supporting determinism over quantum randomness.

   Transition: Theorem 2’s determinism provides the structure needed for Theorem 3, as only a causal, consistent reality can be equivalent to reason.

3. Theorem 3: Reality is Functionally Equivalent to Infinite Reason—reality’s deterministic structure mirrors reason’s properties at an infinite scale.

   • Proof: Detailed Derivation (Direct Mapping):

     • Theorem 2: Reality has causality (cause-effect) and consistency (unbroken laws).

     • Axiom 2: Reason requires the same.

     • Mapping: Reality’s causal chains = reason’s causal deductions; reality's consistency = reason's non-contradiction.

     • Equivalence: Functionally identical—reality "deduces" outcomes like reason deduces truths.

     • Infinite reality scales to infinite reason.

   • Persuasiveness: Universe “makes sense” like a logical argument; aligns with unified theories.

   Transition: Theorem 3 establishes reality’s rational nature, enabling Theorem 4 to show that this infinite reason resides in God’s mind, proving His existence.

4. Theorem 4: GOD exists, and all tangible reality is rational thought in the mind of GOD.

   • Proof: The following steps synthesize Theorems 1-3 and Axiom 1 to demonstrate Theorem 4.

     1. Reality’s Structure Established: Tangible reality exhibits infinite causal chains and extent, as assumed in its definition and consistent with Theorem 2 (full determinism preserves unbroken chains).

        • Derivation: From Theorem 2, determinism ensures every event is caused and consistent, with infinity implying eternal regress/progression.

     2. Reality as Infinite Reason: By Theorem 3, reality’s deterministic, infinite structure equals infinite reason, as its causal chains mirror logical deductions and its consistency mirrors non-contradiction.

        • Derivation: Theorem 3 follows from Theorems 1-2 and Axiom 2; infinity (no beginning/end) extends the equivalence to boundless scale.

     3. Reason Requires a Mind: By Axiom 1, infinite reason (reality’s equivalence) must reside in a system capable of infinite reason—an infinite mind—since reason is exclusively a mind’s property.

        • Derivation: Axiom 1 directly applies; finiteness cannot sustain infinite chains/extent, so the mind is infinite.

     4. Infinite Mind is God: The infinite mind, sustaining reality’s infinite reason, matches God’s definition: singular Consciousness sourcing rational principles (causality/consistency), encompassing all existence (reality exists within it as rational thought).

        • Derivation: God as the sum total aligns with the mind containing infinite reality; alternatives (mindless systems) violate Axiom 1, as reason demands a mind.

     5. Conclusion: Tangible reality exists as rational thought in God’s infinite mind. Since reality exists and is infinite reason (Theorems 2-3), and reason requires a mind (Axiom 1), God—the singular Consciousness—must exist to sustain it.

   • Persuasiveness: The universe’s rational structure, unified as one reality, aligns with philosophical idealism (e.g., Berkeley’s reality in God’s mind) and scientific quests for unified theories.

   • Historically: Max Planck (1944) supports this, stating: “As a physicist, who devoted his entire life to the sober science, the exploration of matter, I am surely free from the suspicion to be held as an enthusiastic dreamer. And so I say this after my explorations of the atom: There is no matter by itself. All matter arises and exists only through a force, which brings the atom-particles into vibration and holds them together as the tiniest solar system of the universe. So we must assume behind this force a conscious intelligent spirit. This spirit is the primal foundation of all matter.”

Q.E.D.

Implications and Reflection

Having proven God’s existence, we reflect on its implications for knowledge and ethics. This opens up infinite possibilities for unifying all knowledge and sciences and obtaining infinite power over all matter via the Mind of GOD by bringing ourself into harmony with HIS perfect law which is love, that is to treat all as self because we are all manifestations of the ONE Consciousness, even GOD, our True Self, which means that whatsoever we are doing to anyone, we are doing it to ourselves, which is the foundation of the Eternal Law of Justice.

Edited September 2Sep 2 by AThinker1

Moderator Note

As you were informed in the other thread, we’re done discussing this theorem or anything connected with it.