Jump to content

Prove of some limit property.


Primarygun

Recommended Posts

I just started my lesson on my elementary limit recently, and I did many exercises to consolidate my knowledge.

I figured out something interesting but I'm not sure whether it is correct.

That's why I need your superb help to prove or to reject it.

There are several ideas of mine.

1.[Math]\lim_{f(x)\to 0} \frac{1}{f(x)} = 0[/Math]

\lim_{f(x)\to\0} \frac{1}{f(x)} = 0

My idea: The limit does not exist.

I don't know how to prove it, because if the function is a fraction, I've heard of inverse function. But I have no idea to prove my thought.

2.[Math]\lim_{x\to -2} \frac{1}{[\sqrt(x+2)]} = 0[/Math]

The limit does not exist.

3.[Math]\lim_{x\to 1} \sqrt{x-1} = 0[/Math]

\lim_{x\to\1} \sqrt{x-1} = 0

My idea: It does not exist because we can't get the limit from the left.

Bolded words refer to non-latex .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think you're right on all three counts. The easiest way of proving (1) is by providing a simple counter-example to show that it's not true for all functions f. As for (2) and (3), they're fairly simple. Just show that as x tends to the limit, the function becomes unbounded.

 

I've also corrected your LaTeX errors. The problem was that you were using \lim_{x\to\0} - the error is highlighted. You just need to use something like \lim_{x \to 0} instead.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you for replacing with the correct ones. I used a lot of time to doing so but I wasn't able to fix it.

(1) is by providing a simple counter-example to show that it's not true for all functions

For (1), so it would be correct if f(x) is not a fraction?

i.e. [Math]f(x)=a_{n}x^n+a_{(n-1)}x^{(n-1)}+....+c=0[/Math]

For (2), what about 2=x where c is a real no.?

How can we prove that it cannot be further simplified ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not entirely sure about that first one. I thought it said:

 

[math]\lim_{x\to 0} \frac{1}{f(x)} = 0[/math]

 

But [imath]\lim_{f(x) \to 0} \frac{1}{f(x)} = 0[/imath] is just like saying [imath]\lim_{y \to 0} \frac{1}{y} = 0[/imath] - this obviously isn't true, in fact the limit doesn't even exist at that point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.