Quote

Unfortunately too often posters rely on verbal descriptives and seek statements from articles to support their beliefs but don't recognize the math shows a different story from the verbal descriptives.

@Mordred statement as well as the math from your beloved article, look at the screenshot again

Which screenshot ?

The only screenshot in this thread.

If your referring to the screenshot from. The Lineweaver and Davies article. Once you read the full article and examine the mathematics the article itself will tell you precisely what I described. 

Never rely on part of any article without examining the full article. 

Never rely on the full article if its own maths says two different things.

It doesn't if you actually understand the paper is examining the different possibilities. Then later on provides the reasons why SR or GR alone is insufficient as neither account for the observer nor the equations of state.

This is beginning to sound much like another sockpuppet attempt quite frankly.

It doesn't if you actually understand the paper is examining the different possibilities. Then later on provides the reasons why SR or GR alone is insufficient as neither account for the observer nor the equations of state.

This is beginning to sound much like another sockpuppet attempt quite frankly.

So I'm not going to waste my time if that's the case.

Genius once again. Are you totally sure that GR alone is not sufficient?

Yep sockpuppet reported 

Truly honest discussion, as always.

Nothing honest in a discussion with a previous banned member using a sockpuppet 

Nothing honest in banning for telling you the truth in your face.

Your definition of truth based on your misunderstanding of the article.

Misunderstanding something isn't the reason you were banned.