A notion "time" has been arised at everyday life of people for indication of occurring events and periodic changes in life and surrounding their world. We can observe the existence of time on occurring changes or at events only. For orientation at time, people are using the reiterative events, such as the orbiting of moon, a rising of sun or the sundown, tide of water on seeshore, and a clock, later.

Thereby, the CYCLES this is an integral, main characteristic of time. Each object in universe (the universe also) has the inherent to him Time Cycle (TC). Indeed, time shows itself as TC of object.

 

What starts all events? I claim - the time. Since the time contains necessary information and energy for realization of events. This a strange at first thought conclusion, I can motivate by using mathematical transformation and logic .

For these purposes, I use known mass-energy relation:

E=mc^2 (1)

Here c is a speed of light. If we speak of speed, in any event, this means the attitude of the way s to time t. So,

c=s/t (2)

Bearing in mind c=const

this attitude defines "the linear expansion of space " in accordance with the existing "analog" (non digital) theory.

Having substitute (2) in (1) we get:

 

E=m(s/t)^2 (3)

 

Whence

t=s/sqrt(E/m) (4)

or

t=s (sqrt m/sqrt E) (5)

That can we see?

Obviously that time has a complex structure and contains the space, energy and mass (information) .

 

SPACE, MASS And ENERGY EXISTS AT TIME ONLY.

 

TIME CYCLE is the UNIVERSAL SOURCE and a SINGLE ACTOR OF ALL EVENTS for ANY OBJECT. It is A PROGRAMM of EXISTENCE .

 

© 2003 Michael F. Dmitriyev

moved to pseudoscience

Originally posted by Radical Edward

moved to pseudoscience

The traditional "Whut?" is absent. So, I do not see the reasons for such displacement of my topic. Your explanation?

Moderators do need explanation, they need only to moderate, for it is in this very moderation an explanation can be found.

What about my thread? I am waiting the replies.

Originally posted by Michael F. D.

What about my thread? I am waiting the replies.

Statements without evidence are pseudoscience, no matter how convenient the train of thought.

He copyrighted it, therefore it must be correct and official.

Originally posted by greg1917

He copyrighted it, therefore it must be correct and official.

He needn't have bothered.

 

Bollocks doesn't get plagiarised by anyone.