Jump to content

What is the scientifically correct way to think of subatomic particles and the atom


Achilles

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Achilles said:

Are they fuzzy looking balls of energy. I know that they are excitation in their respective fields, but that doesn't help me to imagine it visually. I want to imagine how it looks according to current quantum theory.

What things "look like" at that scale depends what you are using to look at them with. I think it's best to think of them in terms of their behavior rather than in visual terms. They are far below the resolution of optical light frequencies. They are combinations of forces, not things with solidity and form as we understand it at our macro-scale.

Edited by StringJunky
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.