Tom Vose

No they don't orbit the nuclei of atoms. They instead exist as a cloud around the nucleus, due to the wave distribution of probability. So they do not orbit, but exist in all places around the nucleus.

Yes. I'm sorry

Well, ok. There isn't many. ................................. What??? My work consists of 127 pages, what makes you think i have the kind of time to check every post?

You can take stuff out of me, But if you fill me up, i never get full... What am I?

Which ones, because i am not doing them all.

............................................. Ok, i am yet to see what this infraction is for, but so much for digging that hole, eh YT? Not that this is a very admirable victory, but i feel the action of changing it for another post, is really simply to save the reputation of the moderator. Ok, how does one offer evidence here... i could give you my house number, and that way you can hear my voice, and then i could also give you Toms' mobile if you want to hear his? Would that be sufficient evidence for his grace? ......................... I would like to know which post i have been infracted for this time.

The infractions i refer to, are the two i recieved concerning my behaviour here at science forums. If i have been in error before in the past, then why so much pus$y-footing around me? Why not just have punished me for other offenses if indeed, it was called for? The reason why it never, is because i haven't breached any other rule here, apart from two others: One for trolling, the same label you gave my infraction for, and another, for foul language, which i more or less feel bad about, because i can usually contain myself quite well. So, the latter here you speak of -- is really a straw man, because unless you just wit up on your behaviour, and admit i never lied, i haven't exactly continued to do anything.

But you must see as you have Paranoia, that i can't be in the wrong, and have merely been targeted by someone who straight down the line, doesn't like me very much. Plus, i don't think my posts are all bad. The greater part of them keep their original places, serving their own good.

I will to my best in the future. This thread was actually intended to be an apologetic thread, not a flame war against me. By the way, i made a complaint about this post, and how does one know if something has been done? I don't think freely calling people idiots is good ettiquette, but purely condescending and insultive.

It's not, are you calling me a liar? You are the one who was in the wrong, and sir, you are the one caught out in error. You have reacted irrationally, and not very professionally at all in your moderating. It is you sir who should be ashamed, for i am not a liar, nor did i lie on the account you claimed i had. I call for my infraction to be retracted as soon as possible, because this is outragous.

Well, no... i wasn't going to respond again here, but this subtly corresponds to my previous thread which was deemed to complicated to the OP. Whilst it is technically true that the big bang is the origin of energy, it goes deeper, where the true origin of energy is revealed as the zero-point energy field, rather than some application of a singular region.

But he signed up for me. Nothing wrong in that, because he was exploring this place. I have done nothing wrong. So technically, he used his own name. I simply use his account.

Well, i remember reading recently, that if you could collect all the gold in the world, it would only be enough to fill three entire football stadiums. A Newton has about the same weight as a Granny Smith Apple, and that would be like a nugget on a good day in the American Rocky Mountains.

Offenses, however, that i have paid for, for other infractions. I am being targeted simply, and this infraction was uncalled for, and equally unjustified. Thank you, and can i clear something up. I never exactly lied about the account either. I am not Tom Vose, i use his account. I am his flat mate, so the bebo page is not mine. How is he correct, unless of course, the rules have been modified just for me so that i may be punished twice for something? As i said, i have been punished already, and this attitude of, ''well, since we aren't right this time, you can still suffer for all the past indiscretions,'' is simply unfair, and i am sure it is a breach of the sacred rules.

Saying they have a degree in science is premature, i would have thought, but not the label scientist, because they do engage in scientific studies, and by definition, makes them a scientist.

Only i never said that we had any that could beat the worlds most fastest computer deriving relativistic equations, or one that can model the universe precisely to superpositing laws. I did however say we had them, and we can calculate the first (or something like it) 15 prime numbers, using methods that normal computers cannot do.

I never passed french, but if i did, i would have said something else. Anyway, you telling me that students in university who work in the field are not scientists? I think these definitions are more or less the same. I would agree with this diplomatic post.

But one Newton of gold... its not really that much

No, i mean the calculations we make using them have different computational methods. We could not do this before. I am not trying to wriggle out of anything.

I don't recognise the v(x) part, this is why i may have asked this question.

Actually, are you not twisting what i said. I never said that normal computers cannot compute answers. I did however point out that quantum computers can do things (like computational processes) in ways that normal computers cannot.

I give up. Just lock this thread, because it's ''obvious'' i can't be a scientist. This is all most of you have even focused on, and its ridiculous to say the least. I am currently a student of physics, (this is my job), and that to me makes me a physicist. So cei la vie.

I received an infraction here, as someone called me a liar. ''Dear Tom Vose, You have received an infraction at Science Forums, The Original. Reason: Trolling ------- keep your lies to yourself, do NOT post them here as Facts! ------- This infraction is worth 10 point(s) and may result in restricted access until it expires. Serious infractions will never expire. Original Post: http://www.scienceforums.net/forum/showthread.php?p=453602 As they exist now, you said. They do exist now, and we can make calculations we couldn't make previously. All the best, Science Forums, The Original ______________'' How the hell did i lie? If we can compute the first (let's say) seventeen prime numbers from using sophisticated quantum computer technology, how is this a lie? I ask this moderator to retract his statement and apologize to me.

Oh my bad.

Actually, why don't you learn a bit about them, before making these unsupportive claims.. ...Oh, Dejavu... How many times will i need to contemplate these reports, before i just give up on your asses?