andrewcellini

one of my favorite albums

an old howard stern bit with two guys both claiming to be the second coming of jesus

I'm sure he did because you're quoted in the op from stranges other thread.

there's nothing really meaningful either. you made the assertion that metaphysical theories are logically indefensible without clear reasoning as to why you accept this. you essentially have a rhetorical tautology rather than a real argument. i hope it really didn't take ten years to reach this conclusion. how does this answer questions pertaining to metaphysics? it seems to outright ignore them.

i've always viewed philosophy as a progenitor of inclination towards something, or to produce a new way of looking at a problem. without philosophy progress seems bleak and misguided. i don't know of any direct impact philosophy has had on solution of problems not that there aren't any examples.