Tsadi

Between molecules, you can think of molecules being seperated by space. A more technical answer, you could come out with virtual particles being exchanged between molecules...

The exchange of energy between molecules are due to the angular momentum of their constituents: atoms. In an angular momentum, energy will be exchanged in [math]t_1[/math] to [math]t_2[/math] in a time of [math]0<r<t<c[/math], so you could say the space between molecules have particles whizzing back and forth, sharing energy with other molecules.

i call one of my friends 'the higgs'(last name higgins, not very imaginative i know but still) i found her ages ago. money please.

I don't think so.

Also, my bet bases this on definite proof.

Throughout the year, we have had quite a few detections of certain particles, such as the mysterious axion -- but there seems to have been a lot of controversy surrounding its possible detection.

The Higgs Boson must also have no controversy.

Protons, Neutrons everywhere,

But not a Tachyon to think.

I bet 100 pounds, twice as much, that the Higgs will not be found.

If anyone here is willing to double it, on you go.

I don't believe Dirac qouted that actually.

It's a myth.

Wonderfully put.

What is more specific, and quite interesting, is that you are female before you are male. The genes choose what sex you will be.

Quantum Mechanics is a statistical theory at best.

Waves determine the probability of finding the absolute square of these statistics, but in whole you cannot say quantum mechanics is purely or fundmentally a wave theory, because if that was the case, we neglect totally the wave-particle duality of nature.

Again, QM is a statistical theory. Nothing more and nothing really less.

How about inflating the balloon, and then sticking the smaller end into the mug until it has a tight grip, and then lift it?

I haven't tested it, but its all i can think of, unless you are allowed to somehow take the smaller end and loop it through the handle of the mug, and lift it that way.

I fixed it myself anyway.

Sorry to be a possible bother.

If you can keep the mirrors cool enough, you could theoretically keep the light trapped for some while. But not forever.

Cool. Sent it to Caps.

So if i select parts needed to be changed, they will insert this information?

Swansont, care to give my question a go?

 

 

 

I was under the impression that that integral was the Action integral.

Why yes, very important too.

Reason why, is because Hamiltons Principle is also known as the principle of least action, which basically means under an integral of action, everything is minimized to such an extend to use the least Kinetic Energy minus the potential energy so;

[math]\delta \int T-U dt=0[/math]

Remember, T-U part here has been substituted for L, which was used previously, since L=T-U.

oookay then.

 

Word salad, quackery, no proofs, mixing psychological enthusiasm with physics concepts, and a touch of condescending preacher'y.

 

I am not too much for ridiculing anything, but this above post is quite ridiculous. You are in a science forum, liyon, not in a church. Don't preach, debate. Either you have evidence to support your case, or you don't. Using nice words and enthusiastic uplifting will not convince anyone.

 

Also, before you get into a physical concept, I suggest you try to learn what it means.

There's nothing in Quantum Physics about meditation, prayer, human experiences or psyche. Nothing at all.

 

~moo

I wouldn't entirely agree with the latter. Consciousness (as many scientists have come to agree on), may indeed have a quantum explanation. It's just that we don't know how to because of the complexities.

That we have a longer amount of time allowed to alter a thread. I think we must have something like a one-day period before the ability to do so is expired.

((Mods - i need to have the ability to change my thread in physics, or i can't perfect it))

Tsadi - cheers

Waves are probabilities. QM is a probabilistic theory.

No escaping waves i am afraid.

I am not clued up on the math behind rotating cylinders, unfortunately. Sorry.

What's the work for Pete?

Richard Feyman described the antiparticle mathematically as a particle moving back in time. This was taken quite literal, but it merely represents the ability to have a symetry in the equations, since symmetry is a very important factor. Such examples may involve the absorber theory which uses the idea of a time symmetry, which gave rise to the Transctional Interpretation which does involve retrocausal events.

So perhaps causality is broken, in very special cases. These cases however purely cannot be physical.

With the earth roughly 1,000,000 times smaller than the sun and 333,000 times less mass, i must slap my head and sigh. I've not read anyone elses replies here, but i am almost absolutely positive, ''size'' would be an issue.

If only one could tap into the zero-point field... more than plenty energy to go around an infinite amount of times...

From what i understand, it has gathered some of the most speculative quantum ideas (such as we create our own reality), and then has submerged them in more gooey psuedoscience.

Very well. I had to check up on that just now.

The quantity in question, the (T-V) part, is the Langrangian itself. It can also be expressed as;

[math]\delta \int Ldt=0[/math]

So, T and V are position, velocity and time, and may not necesserily be expressed by any standard lengths, but can be generalized.

To answer your question, but not by much.

I need to go out for half an hour, or i would talk about it more... but do you mean

H = T + U

T is a function only of velocity and from the conditions before U is a function only of position.

Is there any little problem with SFN you think needs to be solved? Something we could do to make SFN better? Something we could change? Give you a foot massage? Anything?

 

Post your ideas here if you have any.

How about being ignored? I've sent three messages to different administrators, and still nothing

I think he was a physicist...

Only one of the best