Jump to content

Wolfhart Willimczik

Senior Members
  • Posts

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Wolfhart Willimczik

  1. You copied only what fits in your combat strategy against me like a real prosecutor, but there is written also: “…I consider the hypothesis that b-decay is caused by neutrinos, although not really proven beyond doubt, a realistic possibility, realistic enough to justify further research about it.” How can this be –Mister behind the gun – that this physicist agrees with me 100%? That is the difference between real working physicists in the field of research and the Admins in this forum; the first ones want go on with the research - the admins here want shut down everything, because my theory is “mumbo jumbo” in their personnel tailored “reality”. I just see also that he made exactly the same proposal as I: “…The best option would of course be to perform an experiment of this sort on board of a space ship travelling further away from or closer to the sun than the earth does.” Since this admin denies the results of observations there the article: Article removed due to copyright infringement. there! another attempt to block this discussion. I will report this We are in speculations, but he demands a complete house, where he can rest in. Mr. Klaynos, here is an idea, what eventually could grow and have fruits with math, but only if it is not killed before. You will be much more happy in threats with math. By the way: I am not a theoretical physicist. I am an experimental physicist and made 1966 the first traces of alpha particles in a new spark chamber and further I investigated the interaction of metastabil atoms with other atoms and found that a metastable state get ended by a hit by another atom. I waited almost a half century for theoretic physicists to make a theory of it, but what happens? – absolute nothing. Now – on the end of my live (I have 2 cancers and my days are counted) I read that there are new observation which seems to prove my claim. Therefore, I tried to publish it. After this failed I put it in for a. My only intention was it should not be lost for mankind, with it some physicist after me can go on with it. I hoped even to find help here – my mistake. But instead helping me to develop my hypotheses further I am treated in the same way as in a political jail – I am the defendant and some here play the prosecutor. I also was going to post other ideas, but Admins convinced me otherwise: it is better to take them with me in my grave. That is what will happen. Admin: Dein Wille geschehe. Therefore, it is total irrelevant if admins gave me points, warnings and let me drown in their piss, as me was told.
  2. yes, except with the word "more". This comes only in play if there is a chain reaction (laser, gamma bursts etc) between many systems as I explained above. Mostly the free parameter is a point/direction in time and space... It is consistent with other observations. Think yourself of one. For instance in mechanic: you can nothing (in dead nature) move, if you give it not a direction. If you would be able to give it energy for moving without any direction, it would not move, because it don't know in what direction. But what happens in an atom? An electron may get more energy than it needed without simultaniously getting a direction and want emit a photon, but don’t know in which direction if there is nothing out there in a certain direction. The atom itself is total rotational symmetrically. If somebody can move an object without giving any direction, he would render my theory false. In the last 50 years nobody succeeded.
  3. except the last one - and this, because the leading physicists don’t dare to say anything – either negative or positive things to my theory.
  4. You can look in all my publications and you will see it never happend what you discribe - in the contrary, but judge yourself, call the editors. You will hear for instance that I had over 100 positive resonance - a TV broadcast was choosen the best of the year etc. http://www.wolfhartindustries.com/veroef.htm I never did this. I tell you a secret. I am my greatest enemy by myself. I (and others) tried since 1966 to destroy this theory. Nobody succeded. Now my predictions are observed. That's the only thing what counts. If all the admins tolerate vicious lies in this forum it is a dictatorship. Don't confuse the doer with the victim.
  5. You deny everything I wrote, but you presented a vicious lie as "Evidence" without any backup.I just took your own words and proved that the sun returns around the earth. You know exactly what you did and above I wrote what you did. But here again: you looked in Google and you found out the odds that my theory is right are 100 : 1. You took the one as "evidence" my theory is wrong and not reality (that means you) To suppress deliberately 99% of available information is like a vicious lie. You don't like my theory - you don't like me - why are you still here? The rule is if you have a claim you have to present the evidence. and why are you in conflict with me and all other physicist, which made observations in this matter.Why are you claiming only you are able to evaluate evidence? Are you God? Now I am threatened to be drowned in the piss of an army by another admin. (Here must be a nest.) Of course you can drown me in your piss, but as Giordano Bruno, Galileo and other physicists, I will never deny the truth. I said the same thing to the Stasi as the put me in jail. They killed many people, but they could never kill an idea. Do you think you can do it? Now do your worst. - 25 points - and proud of it.
  6. I said only: Ein physikalisches System verharrt solange in einem metastabilen Zustand solange nicht ein bestimmter Wert eines frei wählbaren Parameters von außen vorgegeben wird. A physical system in a metastable state remains as long as not a particular value of an arbitrary parameter is determined from outside. I explained why my experements 1966 support this claim. I tried to publish it now, because there are now observations supporting my claim. Links in my last postings...
  7. and you determine who is wrong and who is write. Rule No 1 What for discuss anything? Of course - you are the hero, the prosecutor – and I the defendant. That’s why you demand to answer all your questions and you answer not my questions. no - this is the link: http://science-technology-inventions.weebly.com/ can't you find it? I have the patent. You can read it in my website I manufacture it in my own corporation. Do you want one? I am sick and can't do what I want...
  8. You seems to be a decent person and I tried a discussion wich people like you, but this is not possible, because always the same jump in crashing the party. There is also a first glance difference. The admin behind the man with the gun stalking me has over 22 000 postings - you under 1000. He is only policing the forum. At youtube admins get not involved in discussions. The police act also so. For a private forum it would also be okay.
  9. ..and made is worse. If you can't even distinguish between an disagreement and a vicious lie you are not able to make this discussion. You should not waist your time. It is still very personnel for the victim. I never picked you. You picked me blocking any decent discussion, Why are just you I have to put with all the time? Why are you always present if I write? Are you stalking me?
  10. I never hold back such information. http://science-technology-inventions.weebly.com/ http://www.youtube.com/user/InventorWillimczik http://www.wolfhartindustries.com/
  11. and you never ask your guests! Look to youtube where it works. Why do you call a vicious lie "disagreement"? (You could - with this logic - call breaking somebody’s nose also "disagreement".) There is not a single observation what "proves my theory wrong" - therefore he is a vicious liar. If this is with the rules I am proud to have now - points, because they are very positive in a negative environment? repeating yourself make it not right. You can't dictate what other persons feel. You did not answer my question. Why can you permanent - all the time - post here?
  12. You proved the sun rotate around the earth. Congratulations! Look in the last postings. The saboteur found a overwhelming number of sources with Google exactly in line with my theory. He suppressed them all deliberately and viciously and cited the one which has doubts and take this as "proof" my theory is wrong. You thing this vicious behavior is not personnel? It is clear Zersetzuung. You can't have both of us. You don't get to decide the rules. Who made the rules if it is not a private forum? There seems to be the problem. I have over 40 videos in youtube with discussions, where never happen things like here. Think about it. There is only a small change necessary...
  13. What would hade happen if Copernicus came in this forum with his idea? Objection1: Use your common sense – not what a crazy cop… your told. Simply watch the sun an entire day standing still. Who is moving? Every kid can see what happens. That is reality! Objection 2: (User cuthroth, posting 103) The experiment has been done. Lots of space crafts have been launched into space, some of them towards and more of them away from the sun. The effect which this new idea predicts would have been noticed. Not least, because space craft designers are very careful. Since no such effect was found we can rule out this idea. If someone's idea does not agree with reality, it is not because reality has made a mistake. Objection 3: I searched only a minute and found enough prove your idea is mumbo jumbo. Nobody agrees with you. There is even a video, what shows clearly you are wrong. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Co8Kf36WtiA Objection 4: Do you thing all the highly respected celebrities from the church are all wrong? Objection 5: Where are your credentials? Objection 6: Do you have prove? Show us your numbers. Objection 7: The sun is nothing, but a hot gas bubble, the earth is solid and heavier than gas and has to stay in the center. Objection 8: You are wrong because you are wrong. Objection 9: Do you have ever seen that many horses, which can pull the entire earth? Objection 10: You are new here and want tell us what we can’t see– a new history making idea? Make first at least 1000 postings and learn our logic. We have highly respected moderators with 22 000 postings saying your theory is mumbo jumbo. We are reality and you are the only one in denial of reality. You want more? Look in wikipedia
  14. Mostly I got not an answer at all, but here an answer typical for this situation. Everybody wont say anything. Ref.: Ms. No. INJP-D-12-00098 Reason for metastable state discovered Establishing causality in nature again Indian Journal of Physics Dear Dr. Willimczik, We had sent this article for review to more than 2 reviewer, unfortunately none of them has given their comments. One of our Editors commented that Affiliation Address is missing in the manuscript and adequate references are not mentioned along with recent works published in the Indian Journal of Physics. Therefore I am unable to proceed further with this paper. Thank you for giving us the opportunity to consider your work. Yours sincerely Editors IJP Editor-in-Chief Indian Journal of Physics
  15. he never said my saying is wrong, but my entire theory, ergo my work of my life. And with taking only 1 negative source from 100. Further he claims to be Mister reality - only he is able to decide what is reality and what not. Such unqualified remarks destroy an entire discussion, destroy an entire idea. And I take this very personnel. Americans say: I am pissed off. Now I have –17 points – and proud of it, because in an negative environment negative points are positive.
  16. Ok – if you are – as you are showing - a drug runner or a weapons dealer I understand your behavior. How can you dare to define what is mine and what not. If you spread out lies about my idea you attack me! This is very personnel? Every judge will see it in the same way. Of course somebody will say he only attacked my nose not the person. That’s your logic. Who brought this infamies lie up “attacking his work is not attacking him?” It seems this forum create a bunch of lies and live from it. "pointed out" in your words means spread out lies. Who read the last postings will see exactly what was happening - Who is lying. You never had any idea what I was talking about, but you destroyed it anyway. Because you are doing things much worse likewise how dare you making such difference - using your private self self tailored definition? to suppress 99% of available information is not an attack? I notice whether it is raining or somebody is pissing on my leg. How can an admin claim I attacked somebody personnel, if I attacked his writing only. Besides I am in Florida and have never seen the person, which I allegedly personal attacked. Has he now the same nose? Ergo: What you say is wrong. The rules are wrong. This forum is wrong.
  17. Yes, if you live in china or north korea I see a need for this. You claim you get prosecuted by a scientific statement here? Never did hear in England are scientists prosecuted, because of a scientific statement. But I can imagine that your colleges will ask you why did you destroy a discussion with a good idea? And you have no answer. Whotever it is yur real name or not You are ashamed of what you did to me! You looked in Google and you found many sources, which are all in line with my new theory – one even word for word! There was only one what said no with an older date - and you copied only this line. - and you claim this is realyty. You put the world upside down! To suppress 99% of scientific statements is not a lie? Supporting this is not dictatorship? In your writing to me you showed your real intention, you want to police this forum and reality that's what you decide. I never say and I never said anything against a person, if he not attacked me! Not a single word could be found - nothing is cited. I defendet myself. Look what wa written before. One member demanded even a public apology to me! And please tell me one thing. What workplace do you have that you are able write here the entire day? Does your boss know this? Who has far over 1000 posts is suspious, but who has that much as these will clearly only policing this forum - playing the Platzhisch.. Sorry -somebody said this is a private forum. Please tell me his name that I can apologize that I entered his castle by mistake.
  18. what means compare It? it is a oppressive regime! It has all signs of it - except the Hex get burned on a stick. Look allone who else is answering! qed If nobody wants learn from the ealder ones who already know how its ends - yes you are right. I said here are not only killed idea, but your future also. I can do no more.
  19. I care Mister, who ever you are, because I may save people from harm. And I warn people who can’t see the danger, because I am old enough and have seen where it will end… Younger people should listening. Any state, society or small forum is characterized how it treats its enemy. I was an enemy of the state in East Germany – and I am proud of, because I disagreed how they people treated. And I was going even rather in jail than denying the truth. (There I found all the scientist I could never talk to outside the jail.) That’s make me so dangerous for all liars and all bad people. I say always the naked ugly truth, knowing I get punished for it. You see I put up even my present picture by demand, even I don’t like it. (I would never hide behind a false picture! This would be a lie.) To deceive their suppressed ones they subduer must always lie on some point. This must be uncovered. I tested this forum and got the result: The suppressors lie! They told above they would publicly say why they punish somebody. I got the following message: Wolfhart Willimczik, You have been given a warning by imatfaal. Reason: Abusive Behaviour <div class='callout'> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Insulting and abusive attacks on other members are not tolerated. Desist now. <br /> <br />[url=" They punish the victim who gets insulted. That's the way it's go. They never point out a single word from me, what would be abusive. This method of punishment is well known. The Stasi/SSD has perfected it. All this inhuman, power misusing people have all the same: fear for the public. I said they should do it publicly. I criticized and I said how it could be done, but changes what makes Admins obsolete are the most dangerously. Remarkable also that nobody has react to my proposal. I tear down their false face – that is the reason why I am banned in every forum, because Stasi methods spread out over the entire internet. They live by anonymity. I even don’t know who punished me (the same as in a law less state), who “imatfaal” is. The police has to make everything publicly in a democracy. As this user stated. This there is no science forum but a dictatorship. I stated: stay away from Wikipedia. Now I say: stay away from all dictatorships! It is the same if you build a fertilizer plant in a city. One day you will see the result. Some users started to “wolfharteln”! What if this spread out? A catastrophe for all false gurus, liars, dictators etc. Did anybody ask himself, why just the trouble maker have that many postings – over 1000? The answer is simple: A real scientist works on his next discovery and has never the time to post here all the time I hade to say it, even if it is my last posting. But I forgive them, because they don’t know what they are doing.
  20. It is not recognizable that this is your real name if others use some nonsense as names Mister and I go not play hide and seek to search for your real name. It is not recognizable that the picture is not from yourself. It is too small to recognize anybody else, even if he is well known. You mislead any newcomer in this forum. Contradictory to your behavior you demand that I make everything crystal clear to you Why are you doing this? What is the purpose of this? Are we here in Kindergarten? Did you ever ask the person in your picture for permission to use it – better to misuse it? And about anonymity are most the communists happy, because the former jailer etc can easily “treat” (say zersetzen) further their former victims, otherwise the victim would recognize him and report him to the police or FBI. Do you know that Wikipedia is full of former Stasi officers given all today a new directive? Nobody notices this. what is "pseudonymously"? By the way: every police man would shoot you with your toy gun, because it is not recognizable as one. One make no jokes about it. because I took your logic and made a extrapolation. (and now I have to go to my physician again)
  21. Took me about a minute to find a real life picture of what the victim looks like after " beating the living daylights out of each other " I fulfill your demand. Here it is my live picture.. Now happy?
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.