homie12

Blackholes as well as neutron stars and the current definition of pulsars belong here. Pretty much the whole gravitational theory does.

I can see you all have a sense of humor. Ending a topic with a question then locking it. Darn thats like being in a round room and being told to sit in the corner

And sense we are in the specualtion forum. We must move dark matter and dark energy over here. Because an opinion being popular is no proof of its reality. Also one doesnt have to want to be different to realize, being well adjusted to a profoundly sick society is no proof of health. thamks for all the insight.

Are we here to learn something new or reinforce what we think we already know

after reviewing back through related themes and paths I have been in, I have to know,,, How old are you kids?

I love science programs, but my pet peeve is when they just state facts without giving a clue HOW they know it. For example, they will always say our Sun will last for a few more Billion years before swelling into a red giant and destroying the inner planets, probably including Earth. How do they know the sun will last so long? Maybe they are way off, and the Sun will become unstable in Millions or even thousands of years from now.

Oh boy, now you are talkin. I love this thread. why is the suns heat signature in reverse? How is it still holding onto the planets if its consuming itself? Why does the solar wind accelorate? Id like to know/ thanks for your responses

Good questions, thanks. If you wouldnt mind saving me quite a bit of typing and review this documentary minus the mythology areas? http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=4773590301316220374# Wallace and Don Scott make undenial rebuttals to the status quo. And i havent thought of some new idea nor do i want to be different. But i would like a fair review of the electric universe theory/ What do you have to lose, the old paradigm? And thanks for your response

Good questions, thanks. If you wouldnt mind saving me quite a bit of typing and review this documentary minus the mythology areas? http://video.google....590301316220374# Wallace and Don Scott make undenial rebuttals to the status quo. And i havent thought of some new idea nor do i want to be different. But i would like a fair review of the electric universe theory/ What do you have to lose, the old paradigm? And thanks for your response

 

 

Oops i forgot, over 4000 years ago someone figured out if you can herd sheep, you can herd people, It takes 3 things: control access to energy i e food control access to information control violence to discipline them to do what you want. So 7 billion people i dont know about every single 1 but I am trying to find some that arent asleep or hyptnotyzed.

wouldnt pulsars, being interpreted as a light house type of effect where the spotlight interpreted effect is a revolving beam of light be considered unprovable? Especially when the flash rate would cause the object to fly apart. But isnt that why they made of neutronian matter? A relaxation oscillator is provable. This example can be implemented with a capacitive or resistive-capacitive integrating circuit driven respectively by a constant current or voltage source, and a threshold device with hysteresis (neon lamp, thyratron, diac or unijunction transistor) connected in parallel to the capacitor. The capacitor is charged by the input source causing the voltage across the capacitor to rise. The threshold device does not conduct at all until the capacitor voltage reaches its threshold (trigger) voltage. It then increases heavily its conductance in an avalanche-like manner because of the inherent positive feedback, which quickly discharges the capacitor. When the voltage across the capacitor drops to some lower threshold voltage, the device stops conducting and the capacitor begins charging again, and the cycle repeats ad infinitum.

Oh im sorry. You havent heard of Wallace Thornhil nor Don Scott? Pleasant people really they are. I was wondering how , with 85% of gravitational theory theoretical, wouldnt it qualify as speculation? Blackholes are something you cant see so how did they get away with that? Then when instruments detected energy coming from galactic centers, they invented the acrecian disk. When will we get a picture of the famous ort cloud? What does it mean, "on about", that saying or phrase. I believe I answered ajbs question? Thanks for your responses

!

Moderator Note

Moved from "Suggestions, Comments and Support"

Wouldnt gravitational theory, Like the sun being a fusion engine , and blackholes and such qualify gravitational theory as speculation?

Actually whats the definition of mass? Because my college professor said dont ask. Id like to know really. thanks for your responses

Are you talking about "plasma cosmology"?

This is what I was refering to. Thanks for asking ajb. http://www.plasmacosmology.net/electric.html thanks for your responses.

well with the new data since the time of newton, especially in the last decade or so. hence my reference to the 21st century. Are you guys going to make this topic like pulling teeth? Because gravitational theory has brought so much theory when just about every convienence invented came from tesla and not einstein nor edison. And the electric universe theory was what i was refering to. Wallace Thornhil made a few predictions nasa couldnt. Anyone try asking him? I have. He has reproducible answers. . So does Don Scott. What do you think about point of view? Thanks for your responses.

I thought neutral gases in a vacuum do not coelesce?

If the sun consumes itself, How is it still holding onto all those planets after 4.5 billion years?

I keep having this question of the legitimacy of gravitational theory. It has generated so much theoretical confusion. The electric universe theory seems so much more obvious. Am I that much of a dullard?

This being the 21st century, wouldn't it change the previously 300+year old paradigm of gravitational theory with electric universe theory? Can we examine Anthony Perats work in this field? Anyone with a source for that? Shouldnt hannes Alfvenes work as well as Kristien Birkelands, considered in a venue of this nature?

Even as we push the envelope on space travel and plunge into the St Andreas Fault seeking an alien trinity: Science, God and the Devil; we cringe at the slightest unknown mystery here on earth. So, just what is our problem? Not planning to have, or attend a New Years Eve gala last evening, 12/31/2011, it seemed like a good chance to watch some TV. So, after the six o'clock news I turned on the history channel. First, some nerdy but seemingly intelligent folks were out in the woods hunting down "Big Foot", or (Sasquatch) if you will. How long has this series kept us spellbound? Whoopee!

 

Next a bunch of very distinguished speaking braineiacs were "theorizing" their facts on "Extra Terrestrials", which was also a Ho-Hummer and nothing new. Then the "Modern Day Moonshiners" took over, followed by "Gold Rush". And HELL!, I hadn't even switched channels. Now I know all of us need a bit of diversion from time to time, but just how much Bull Shit is too much? Plus there was also basketball and football to watch.

 

After being fascinated for a time by nuts chasing a Squatch?, Seeing some astrologically proven Mayan pyramids? Mysterious Crystal skulls (13), Two guys making moonshine and a bunch of guys losing their life savings and freezing their asses off while up in Alaska panning for gold; it was 10 P.M. So thinking, "and a partridge in a pear tree", I undressed and went to bed. "Happy New Year".

Oh I get it. This is a carnival of silliness?