Pincho Paxton

Then your wording was wrong, you said established physics based on both theory and observation does work with aether. Which includes the words DOES WORK. Do you think nothing can be solved from unifying physics? It is a window to observing the invisible materials out there, and maybe using them. Time, and dark Matter are two examples of unifying physics to Quantum Physics. I'm not sure what science would do with them, hopefully improve space travel, and maybe by understanding atoms, and biology science can solve a few biological questions. You would be amazed at the clarity of the Universe when you know what is out there. How the brain works.. it's all just amazing.

I don't think your reply works to.... Replying to Why the quantum world appears weird? Because you are talking about standard physics. I was talking about making Quantum Physics work with the Aether.. and then changing it to standard physics.

Yes I can answer the questions. currently mathematicians use high level maths to describe the universe, but you can break maths down to very simple forms like binary code. You can say that switches are either on, or off, or you could say that particles are either apart, or overlapping. You can break all of the Universe into a very simple mathematical formula... +1 + -1 = 0. +1 would be a particle membrane. -1 would be the hole in the middle of the particle. 0 would be the vacuum that they are surrounded by. From this particle you can create the entire universe, because the total of the membrane, the hole, and the vacuum will work together to create Trinary code results. But not only that, but their average is zero.. and the average is therefore energy conservation.

You don't have to prove the Aether is there to make Quantum Physics work. All you have to do is say that Quantum Physics CAN work. And then you make any sort of possibility that would work physically. So long as you use physics to make Quantum physics work it doesn't matter if it is proved or not, it just means that people are not trying hard enough to make it work.

I think they are the same thing. I don't really have time to study everything, but from what I can gather you just have a missing particle... the Aether. It becomes a lot easier to get an understanding of what is happening then. Scientists just tend to get over-excited about things that they don't understand, and start throwing out nonsensical words.The only real problem is "Why is the Aether so hard to detect?" Well it is half negative mass, and this makes it equal zero most of the time, especially over an average distance which is the scale that we would see. So it could be very spiky in places, but it is tiny, so the spikes are averaged out. You nearly always end up with a flat wave.The photons travel through these spikes, be we average them out.The spikes lock the Aether to the Earth for a very brief moment, so the Micheal Morley experiment was just observing the Aether locked to the Earth. When you can make a rational explanation like that, it doesn't matter whether you believe it or not. It matters that you can make sense of Quantum physics.It matters that there are explanations that work that haven't been tested yet.

Ok, let's say for simplicity that we are 1 billion particles.. say atoms. We are 1 billion atoms for simplicity. When we die, we become dust.. 1 billion atoms of dust. Our electricity becomes static electricity. The total is what we were, nothing is lost. So conservation works no matter how you decide to propose it. I believe in the Aether, and we become Aether, still nothing lost. In fact, nearly any proposal you can make will work. It's very easy to attribute conservation of energy to most situations.

Particles do have a specific place, and energy, but when you try to observe that position you blow them out of the way like a wind. Say you were trying to measure the static electricity of two balloons touching. The only instrument you have to measure them is the reflection of wind off their surfaces. Each time you did a measurement the wind deflection would blow the balloons apart. That's what happens when you measure electron positions. So today, scientists try to use high speed laser impulses. Grab an image before they move apart, and I think it will work.

Philosophy..eh. The thing about philosophy is that it isn't really a theory of anything. I feel it belongs on philosophy forums.

Take a look at the aberration of light, and see if you find something new. Add your massive body misalignment idea to it. Maybe you get a new idea, maybe you don't. Personally, I thought about changing the word light to possibly time.

Of course it's true, you don't need maths to apply this to every theory in the book. It is just written illogically in the way that everything is enclosed at a distance in 4D. Everything is enclosed locally and polarised.

His/her mind was altered by drugs to make this thread!

I don't know if you are done. I don't know if you have any physics in there at all.

Yeah, well I try to replicate what the Universe does.. it's just an experiment.

And remember that the Universe does it without maths.

They are flat waves. Consider an Igloo, it starts as flat ice, flat wave. You dig a hole, negative wave. Build the dome, positive wave. The dome fits exactly in the hole.. zero wave. So what you have is a total of zero, and yet you have a structure. Your eyes looked out across the ice, they did not pick up a signal. Now they look across the ice they pick up a dome. but you haven't changed the quantities.The positive energy that pops up, is taken from the negative energy that pops down.

The problem with you argument here is that my theory predicts all of these behaviours. Even before I found out that particles pop into existence I had a theory that was based on that assumption. I even know why, and how they pop into existence.Quantum physics may be as complex a system as the weather, but it is easily understandable still, and is based on physics.Similar rules to The Game Of Life in fact. Particles pop into existence like ear drums flutter around. We have no senses to detect the flat wave, and we also hardly ever interact with the negative wave. But we have evolved to sense the positive waves pretty well. The problem with negative waves is that they head away from us, so if you want to sense them you need to pick them up in the other direction.. or mirror them. The flat waves we call nothing, and ignore completely, but they are ready to bulge in either direction, so they are not a stable state of zero. Even when you have figured out all of the flexible properties, you still get them overlapped, and also interconnected. It's complex, but not as weird that it doesn't make sense.

It was the scale that I forgot about. Once you get to the building blocks of all materials you need a shape that folds, and loops like a twisted elastic band, or a constant in/out flow of material.

Quantum particles popping into existence isn't all that surprising really is it? They would hardly amount to anything, just beyond nothing at all.

If you have spin, you have rotation around the black hole don't you? And you get spin from the fact that it is hardly likely that particles will cross collide. Or what do you have?

The Quantum World isn't strange at all, it is just misunderstood.

I don't know, I was surprised at the amount of movement in that. I didn't add the negative mass either. I just wanted to see what would happen. I should really do the full test. I tend to move on to other things though. I am currently working on a Neural Network of an ants nest.

Maybe at the quantum scale, yeah probably.

Time is relative. Your shape is absolute. The shape wouldn't even work around a body, because the moving body would stretch the shape. If you want to see the shape of time look in a mirror facing a mirror then meta morph that shape to give it a motion bow shock.

I think of it as a kind of physical trinary code. Where energy is pushed into containers, and when the containers overlap the energy can cross from one place to the next, expanding, and shrinking the containers. We evolved with these eyes, and senses to look through millions of these containers in one go. As we look through them we get results. As the two slit experiment travels through them it alters those containers. When we try to observe those containers we alter those containers by allowing them to overlap, and pass their information along.

I have a matter gets bigger, and matter gets smaller. I have broken maths down to the simplest form that I could get to work... +1 + -1 = 0 +1 is the Aether membrane. -1 is a negative mass hole inside the membrane. So scaling happens in my theory when the membrane of two Aether particles overlap. The edges overlap, and the area of those edges increases the +1 to say 1.00000000000000000000001. And that is the electron. The electron energy then reduces the +1 down 0.9999999999999999999999. The hole in the middle -1 now raised slightly. To scale the negative mass down there is an internal negative bump, cause by a polarized layer of negative particles... Dark Matter.