MrSandman

Well in respone to AI I will look at it latter, but I'm for now still saying matter cannot be created or destroyed. It can't it is a LAW. Antimatter maybe can create matter into energy, but the matter is still there. You get my point?

It's meosis 1 the cycle of reproduction. So now go into your textbook and find the stages of meosis 1. It isn't hard at all.

Yeah, mind you air resistence is quite powerful. That's why airplanes can fly.

No I haven't, but matter cannot be created or destroyed. You know I'm right search you feelings. There's no such thing as anti-matter. It could break apart matter and the matter would just go somewhere else, but it is still there. You can make it turn to nothing.

Neat, thanks for explaining. Makes since, however they should keep trying to make cells in the lab through chemical reactions. I know my comment was a little off subject, but I thought if someone could explain, creato would get a better understanding of evolution. Considering that the cell is the basis for evolution, and that my friend is irrefutable. Thanx again for explaining, I'm going to give you as much rep as I can.

I think you need some surious self reflection. Ask yourself if you want to be hindered from things you love because of being over weight. Start thinking about things you want to become. Go for the goals, they might not be physically active, but if you have something to keep your mind off food you'll probably lose weight.

Yeah, I think I wasn't on the same page. However, it does relate, I've talked to quite a few of the army personal and they think that what saves a life is worth it even if it encourches on people's privacy. Remember, you most likely won't be spyed on. This is off subject, but oh well. I've talked to military personal and close friends that are in the military. I haven't found one yet that didn't think being Iraq was a bad thing, but a good thing. I've talked to a tank engineer and she says that she has definitely seen more good than bad come from the U.S.. She also said that the media was destorting everything, and always looking on the negetive sid of things.

It is based on empirical obeservation, they have tried to see if they could destroy matter, but they can't from that also the Law of Definite Porportions: A compound always contains elements in certain definite proportions, never in any other combination; also called the law of constant composition It is concrete enough to be law. Your definition of theory isn't quite right, because it has several definitions. Theory: a well-substantiated explanation of some aspect of the natural world; an organized system of accepted knowledge that applies in a variety of ... hypothesis: a tentative theory about the natural world; a concept that is not yet verified but that if true would explain certain facts or phenomena; "a scientific hypothesis that survives experimental testing becomes a scientific theory"; "he proposed a fresh theory of alkalis that later was ... a belief that can guide behavior; "the architect has a theory that more is less"; "they killed him on the theory that dead men tell no tales" http://wordnet.princeton.edu/perl/webwn The word theory has a number of distinct meanings in different fields of knowledge, depending on their methodologies and the context of discussion. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theory

Yeah, I do, but when I have to do research my college professors don't want me using it as a source. It has a too high of a chance for error, but sometimes it's the good source you can find. I've read several articles where there was a million of citations missing.

I hope you guys figured out my mistakes in the quote, I was tired. I find it interesting that there's is no new forms of cells. I want input!!!!! You guys keep going back to cell mutation. I want to know about why new cells cannot spontaniously form now, not even the simple ones. Like it said in the book. I'm here to learn, so enlighten me. Notice my signature/quote. Here's the corrected quote: "Although life likely evolved spontaneously in the environment of early Earth, biologists have concluded that no additional cells are orginating spontaneously at present. Rather, life on Earth represents a continuous line of descent from those early cells" The whole quote is related nothing in it is seperate. Otherwise it wouldn't have been it's own paragraph. I really need a biologists input on this.

You use X instead of "times" a variable like in. 3x-2=22 solution: x=8

Not you, sry, the guy who made the post I was making my post when you posted yours. Not you him, sry.

Crap, then it's a trick question. Try using it again and where it says x use x as a variable.

My PREVIOUS POST. Look up. I like the words you came up with very creative.

No! It isn't very good. It's the editable encycolpedia

+-/x +/-x x-/+ x/-+ -/x+ /-x+ -/+x /-+x /x+- -x+/ /+x- -+x/ x+-/ x+/- +x-/ +x/- Here's the possible solutions

Notice my post.

I'm just curious have you ever talked to a person in the army about the war?

Hey don't you love being at the top of the food chain? Firefly, you should shut-up while most of us don't hate your guts. It's people like you who think that flipper should be president. Because, why not? Animals have the same right to live as us. Just remember this: Man is hungry. Man sees beast. Man conquers beast. Man eats the beast. It's the way of superiority. Of course by the sounds of it you have a 50/100 chance of killing the pig, because you obiviously stated that you only have as much right to live as the pig. I could just imagine...You kill a pig then you eat it Since you believe that humans have the same rights to live as the pigs you let your three year-old son alone by the pig. You come back later and see that the pig has indeed killed your son, and you don't think much of it. After all he had just as much right to live as the pig. I think most of the other posters will agree with my view on your beliefs. My brother wants to kill a squirrel now just because of your posts.

You also need to see my other post in Questions about Evolution.

(m) (16) I have to disagree with JHAQ. The fetal does have feelings about its eminent demise. There has been videos shown at very early ages where the fetus was try to move away from the tube, or should I say squirm away to give you a better idea. I'm prolife, but totally agree that prevention is what we need to worry about. However, in answer to the author of the thread. I say that a girl who is raped should take the baby to term, because the baby had nothing to do with it. Why should it have to pay for the convience of the mother and the crime of a man?

Hey Creato what your saying isn't very reliable. For one thing they're not going to take the bible, which can't be tested scienctifically as a source. I'm a creationists, but when it comes to evolution they got some interesting points on it. That quite frankly are very hard to find any thing against the source. However, I do believe that there's errors at the site talkorigins. They need to stop giving it as their only source. Along with Wikipedia.

Well notice it's a theory then try and prove it wrong scienctifically. It isn't possible, that's why it is a law. Take for instance the law against speeding that wasn't around back then, because it didn't apply, but now it does.

Hey Ecoli does this sound fimiliar? Hehehehe....Yes, it I MrSandman. However I want to ask you and all the diehard posters what you think about this.... "Although like likely evolved spontaneously in the environment of early Earth, biologists have concluded that no additional cells are orginationf spontaneously at present. Rather, life on Earth represents a continuous line of descent from those early cells" Source: Biology Eighth Edition Chapter 4.1 Authors and Accreditation: Jonathan B. Losos, Harvard University; Kenneth A. Mason, Purdue University; Susan R. Singer, Carleton College; Peter H. Raven, Director, Missouri Botonical Gardens; Engelmann Professor of Botany Washington University;George B. Johnson, Professor Emeritus of Biology Washington University I thought it interesting to think of the chances of the cell occuring spontaniously, yet they aren't changing today. Note: this isn't some creation textbook it's first chapter is all about Darwin.

Pheremon, read about it to understand.