prove_it

Nice you I have to give respect making the experts on here look good not like the other guy but i can understand how he might have got that upset. Turyshev does seem to have a lot on the subject and thanks to the internet you can get all his public work in english pdf. yes general relativity does seem to work quit well. As for the other i like string theory for some reason I still cant figure out why tho. Thank you for showing how Experts should reply.

So could you get out their and test for me how mass newly applied to spacetime effects it ( you know if it curves or if it bends at all etc.) thanks. Or point me in the direction of the tests or experimental evedince that proves that mass causes space time curve. Assuming that that theory was not created by op but was a part of einstien's work. Now as for the claim that scientfic theory is testable is not true if it was it would become true or false as a result of testing that is why they call it theory because it cannot be proven altho they can find circumstantial evedince that supports it( last i knew that was not enough to prove anything). So I am a missouran show me the proof put mass in some space time and let me know what you come up with. You know what ill do it for you hold on. Dear op jut look at a comet it has a feld and causes space time to curve witch causes a little gravity for it but only a little due it its amount of mass just like space trash and asteroides and can be pulled into our space-time well or gravity field where it meats our atmosphere and is either incenerated by the heat or falls to the earth ending its effect on space time because it either joins earth's mass that affects our space time or is incenerated. They say the proof is in the pudding well here it is if mass can cause space time to cure and create gravity then it must be relative to the amount of mass and density of said mass and guess what it is and you can see that every time you see a shooting star or space trash burning up in the atmosphere well not every time just when it is pulled in by our gravitational field bucause our field is biger than its is because we have more mass. I hope this answers your ? as this is as simple as i can make it yes mass causes space time to curve how simple its called displacement just like a boat on water the more mass the more space time is displaced as space time is a form of mass or it could not exist at all it just happens to be a heaver mass than the planets and other stuff floating in it just like almost all theories sugest witch brings in to question is a black hole a exploded sun or just really really dence mass do to the more mass more gravity over itme with astroids adding to the mass till it becomes so dence that all you can see is the reflection of the distortion left on the serface of space time. Even if you buy nothing of what i typed here today remember both of you seing how i can only tell you how i inturput what i see in nature that you both are probably now dumber for having read what i typed unless you dissagree then i will be happy to pretend that I am a smart fella even tho i am tired and cant spell straight. Umm relativity to your self and that object most likelysimply meaning if you where standingon that object and looking at him he would (duh). As for word soup o my bad dont want to get my physics terms mixed up word salad i make it all the time so i know how it tastes and yours is the best you have to give me the recipe. SIG. As a lepton i pretty much only respond to weak forces wich explains why i felt i had to reply to this. You know he is right Your credentials don't give you the right to make unreasoned claims ( the first amendment does). From what i hear from you i doubt you have any credentials. Likining your loose speculations to brain sugery is the most ridiculous thing i have ever heard. then to go on and try and i mean to try to say that a laywer dosnt twist things likining you avrage person to a second class citizen. In a proud exclamation that you think you are better than everyone else. Imo you sir subtract from society. I do agree however that thats not how science works however to claim the people with out a physics degree cant add to physics you need to go back to school and learn about the people who made the theories that physics is based on. And as for the rest of the bs you just said has made all people with expert next to their name on this site look more ignorant than a scared and angery third grader. Yes we need math for physics but any one can observe wich is the basics of physics. just like a arm chair fake going on the internet to masterbate you ego because no other scientist will take you seriously I sure wont and mit wont my professor would have sent you packing. I dont see how you think you are knowledgable in any situation. SIG.As a lepton i pretty much only respond to weak forces wich explains why i felt i had to reply to this.