Money

i know it sounds funny and is kind of a mix between

relativity and biology but i learned that the message

that is sent to your brain is made of electricity

for example, when you touch a hot stove the

message that is sent to your brain is made of

electricity so isn't that pure energy and isn't light pure energy

i know it cant go as fast as light because it has to move from cell

to cell to get to the brain but does it move close to the speed

of light???

and the speed of light is an instant arrival right??

i mean if something could move at the speed of light

it would be at its destination in an instant well if

someone has a good nervous system aren't some peoples

reaction at an instant so cant the message be moving close

to the speed of light?

for example. touching the hot stove with a good nervous system

don't some people move there hand the second they touch the stove

wouldn't that be considered an instant?

for example

if i took a popsicle stick and bent it till it snapped in 2

wat did i really do did i break molecules, or did i break

the bonds that hold the molecules together ? idk

and if i did only break bonds why do little parts of the stick

break off too ???

z2 - 5z +5 = 0

z= -b+sqrtb^2-4ac

---------------

2a

z= 5+sqrt-5^2-4x1x5

------------------

2(1)

i tried putting that in to my calc. but it sed domain error

so i just tried taking that apart and solving it and i got

Z= -10

lol hope im right

kome on man lol i wanna learn what that means and how to use it

i like learning new stuff im addicted to it but i hate school lol

can one of you guys at least get me started on learning that 1i stuff

dont even have to teach me alot just enough to get me started

i'll learn the rest on my own using the internet

i think martin is lol or swansont if they count

wait arent there prime even numbers if u take a prime

even number and multiply it by a odd consecutive wont

that product not be divisible by two

arent prime not divisible by 2 or anything as a matter of fact

i forgot??? lol

wats 1+i mean ???

lol

i think it was integers but im not sure

ima find out 2day

lol it may not seem seriouse to you guys

but here it is

if u multiply two consecutive numbers will that

number always be divisible by 2

ex. 2x3=6 6/2=3

ex. 5x6=30 30/2=15

plz give me sum numbers that will prove this wrong lol

i argued my ass off wit my math teacher saying

i'll find sum numbers to prove him wrong (help a brotha out lol)

Einstein's general relativity says that all the planets

and our earth actually travel in a "straight line"

within a curved space-time.

Put another way....GR can show that the earth is not orbiting the sun, rather the earth is travelling a straight path and space/time is wrapped/curved around the sun.

So gravity = space-time curvature.

That is from another topic in this forum if this is true

are we not heloicentric?

does "everything" in the universe follow the curvatures?

does even light follow the space curvatures?

what are the curvatures exactly?

Martin thanks for helping me understand

an sorry if im a bother lol but im just really interested

but yea im a little confused about sum of the calculations

Z=2 distance now= 17.1 GLY

speed moving away now= 1.24

distance then= 3.34 GLY

speed moving then= 1.17c -----------i get that

Z=7 Distance now= 28.75

speed moving away now= 2.08c

Distance then= 3.59 GLY

Speed moving away then= 3.07c -------- i get this one too

Z=1100 Distance Now= 45.49 GLY

speed moving away now= 3.3c

Distance then= 0.04 GLY

Speed moving away- 56.95c ---------im confused on this one

if the object was closer to us "back then" then how was it

traveling faster away from us then now when its further away ???

i thought the farther away the faster it will move

i have a thought in the back of my head that it might be

have somthing to do with the time wen tha universe was opaque

and light first started moving as i've seen u describe in other posts

but idk

i've seen som1 describe the universe like a rubberband being stretched

and i see that as a good way to picture it the edges strech faster than

the center

kan we move to the next step Martin

i've been messin wit that Calc. for about 2 days now lol

idk i thought charge was related to energy lol

i dont kno alot about this stuff

but i read that photons have no charge so how kan they carry energy

besides the why and what factor wich i understand

wat u mean now but

i thought that Atoms were made of quarks

and does light travel through objects??

photons have no mass and that is what makes

them move so fast rite well are there no other

particles that contain no mass ??

and is a particle an atom or made up of atoms

if so if light is pure energy wouldnt the atoms

be made of pure enery ???

im understanding the calculator pretty well

and i understand wat ur saying about tha redshift formula

but im having trouble understanding wat Redshift actually is

ive read up on it but im having a hard time comprehending it

i understand all the outcomes except

The comoving volume within redshift z is 11486.128 Gpc3

The comoving radial distance, which goes into Hubble's law, is 13997.6 Mpc or 45.655 Gly

i dont kno wat these are and i kind of get the angular size difference

Do you have any trouble understanding how light that is emitted from an object when it is receding from us at, say, 2c (twice the speed of light) could eventually reach us?

i understand that pretty well if its a celestial body that emits light.

what if its a planet moving that far away that wouldnt emit light correct?

but i do understand that if it emits light moving 2c away that light will eventually reach us because light is constant and will keep going in whatever direction it was emitted in. but b-cuz the universe is expanding it will just take longer

Martin how do u kno so much kuz wen i graduate idk wat college

to go to for mainly science like this and u are Smart lol wat college did or do u go to

i hope im understanding this rite

(we havnt gone over things like this is school im just workin off the knowledge that i've gained from reading many topics on this site and other various websites)

in this topic

http://www.scienceforums.net/forum/archive/index.php/index.php?t-2889.html

you say

"But that does not mean that the distance to a remote galaxy cannot be increasing at a FTL rate."

if i understand correct your basically saying the distance between us and

remote galaxies is increasing at ftl speeds is this happening to all galaxies around us not just the distant ones.

and if so woudnt galaxies

that we are able to observe not be observable because they are moving

away so fast

and p.s. i dont know alot about all this kind of science i have a little

understanding but im still touchin the surface but i've been getting

relativity, how the universe is expanding, light all that stuff pretty well so far