Money

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gusXL_p9wxc

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xa4P4ugIjrE

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8q15b1SLRzk

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=25eLbJs4jq8

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tziqNzFxarU

http://home.earthlink.net/~drestinblack/generator.htm

http://www.teslasociety.com/warden.htm

http://users.tm.net/lapointe/HowItWorks.htm

these are all videos and articles explaining it

Merged post follows:

He figured out how to draw large amounts of energy from the Ionosphere with a tower without using a lot of energy in the process and once this is done could provide "wireless energy" to the world using a few more towers. i believe the tower was a very large tesla coil modified. Tesla coils can use a certain small amounts of energy and emit many times more. (small compared to the amount emitted).

Tesla believed he could supply the world with "Free" energy and he proved it but because he could businessmen wouldn't fund him anymore since they wouldn't be able to make a profit. In one of his experiments in Colorado using a very big Tesla coil created lightning and through pumping electricity in through the earth lit a light bulb placed in the ground 25 miles away.

in this article i was reading about how a Tesla coil works the article says

"An inductor converts an electrical current (symbol I, measured in Amperes) into a magnetic field (symbol B, measured in Tesla [yes, named in honor of Nikola Tesla]), or a magnetic field into a current. Inductors are formed from electrical conductors wound into coils."

http://users.tm.net/lapointe/HowItWorks.htm

how is it possible to to convert an electrical current into a magnetic field and vice versa ?

and by doing this is does the area effected by the magnetic field have electricity in the "air", and is that house Tesla was able with without wires or anything make light bulbs glow by just him holding them in this field?

In an a document by him called "On Light and Other High Frequency Phenomena"

i need help understanding this

"If i am not precisley conscious of the motion, it is, because the images are vague or indistinct, being blurred by the superimposition of many. But when i perform the motion, does the impulse which prompts me to the action come from within or from without?"

a few sentences later after describing the ideas of some people he explains what he thinks the answer is. This is where i got confused

"I am convinced that the motive impulse must come from the outside. For, consider the lowest organism we know-and there probably many lower ones-an aggregation of a few cells only. If it is capable of voluntary motion it can perform an infinite number of motions, all definite and precise. But now a mechanism consisting of a finite number of parts and few at that, cannot perform are infinite number of definite motions, hence the impulses which govern its movements must come from the environment."

thats his answer the ways he writes its got me confused

and this is the rest of this paragraph of what he says rite after that

"So, the atom, the ulterior element of the Universe's structure, is tossed about in space eternally, a play to external influences, like a boat in a troubled sea. Were it to stop its motion it would die: hatter at rest, if such a thin; could exist, would be matter dead. Death of matter! Never has a sentence of deeper philosophical meaning been uttered. This is the way in which Prof. Dewar forcibly expresses it in the description of his admirable experiments, in which liquid oxygen is handled as one handles water, and air at ordinary pressure is made to condense and even to solidify by the intense cold: experiments, which serve to illustrate, in his language, the last feeble manifestations of life, the last quiverings of matter about to die. But human eyes shall not witness this death. There is no death of matter, throughout the infinite universe, all has to move, to vibrate, that is to live."

http://www.free-energy.ws/pdf/1893onlight.pdf

thanx : )

Merged post follows:

all that i posted can be found near the end of page 5 - beginning of page 6

I hope now you are all right with that.

im cool wit it

an thanx for the links definitely gone read up on it Professor Martin

i'll let u know wen i finish the work assigned lol

thnx alot i understand wat u guys are saying

i just cant cope with there being "nothingness"

because that small dense state that made matter and space

cant come from no where but its stil only wat ppl think

so yea i understand wat u guys are saying gracias senors : )

thanx alot i kno i asked alot and i appreciate u actually answered

im going to keep learning on about it im hooked to learnin this stuff

lol GR = General Rel. and SR = Special rel. i didnt relize that till

i read this lol thats wat had me Real confused i was wonderin wat

every1 meant by those thnx man ~1~

wen the big bang occurred as i understand it

the universe was at one extremely small point i think they called

it the Primordial Atom but then it blew

it was small (compared to now) and grew well

if the universe was a bubble expanding with all matter inside it

what kept all the matter from going outside this "bubble"

of a universe ??? its kind of hard for me to explain the question

but i think i asked good enough to get good answers

i kno im responding late lol but im goin to

What is GR exactly i have ideas but i wanna know for sure

What is SR?

how does Quantum Gravity work?

if its burning O2 that causes the flame why every time someone

uses a lighter or makes a fire the whole atmosphere goes aflame

i kno its ounds stupid but wat is fire really

is it pure energy? a gas?

wat is it

but i dnt know wat all of them are thats why i would liek

you guys to tell me the name of sum astronomy, physics,

space, related like the theory of relativity, or laws of thermodynamics

wat are the names of other laws and theories that are important to

the topics i named

im askin wat theories and laws should i read up on

what theorys and laws should i read up on

or that have a lot to do with astronomy, phyics, jus science in general

for example/ the theory of relativity, laws of thermodynamics

what other ones should i read up on

help appreciated

thanx for ya answers

just 1 moer question why do scientist believe that a supermassive

blackhole is at the center of every galaxy, do they have telescopes

or instruments so powerful they can see that distance and even so

they could probably only see the next galaxy over. so even if that

galaxy had a blackhoel at the center how does that mean EVERY galaxy

has one at the center

answers appreciated : )

in the article it said microwave photons traveled faster than the speed

of light photons are light, so whats the difference between microwave

photons and normal photons? how can u make light faster than light?

1st off i watched this about space and the scientist

came to the conclusion that at the Center of EVERY

Galaxy is a Super Massive Blackhole that has 3 billion times

the mass of the sun how can they say that about

every galaxy and i thought blackholes had infite mass,

density and infinite gravity??.........

2nd. Stellar Blackholes rip u apart before u actually reach

the inside and with Super Massive blackholes u reach the

inside but once u do u get incinerated by the stars and other

matter swirling around in it.......

what makes scientist come to these conclusions? is it proven?

3rd. once u cross the event horizon not even light can escape

what can have that kind of pull to grab light....lights a constant

if its gravity ...can gravity be strong enough to stop light on its path

i understand that im asking alot and i appreciate if i get answers

just really interested and u guys smart as hell

Now Blazars........

what are they really? and do any of yall have an idea on what

the jet stream that they shoot out can be made of

the jet stream of whatever it is is sent at 99% the speed of light

thats what the TV program i watched said.

i understand that the blazars have alot of energy but HOW

does it shoot material so fast

Thanx for whatever answers u can give me

is there a difference between the two

or are they the same and if they are different

what makes them different than one another??

i dont know very much about special relativity compared to you people

but from reading topics in this forum

you cant ever reach reach C because even if u reached 99.9%C

and u had more energy C would still be C from your point of view

while moving 99.9%C light wouldnt look any different than if you

were looking at it from the speed we are look at it from earth right >???

it doesnt matter how fast you go light still looks the same ???

iight thanx but why is it impoosible to reach absolute zero

1. why is it impossible to reach zero kelvin

cant experiments be done on a enclosed area

or something like that and eventually put it at absolute zero

and if someone was frozen at absloute zero

could they go through time then be warmed up enough

to live like in movies ???

2. if matter cannot be created or destroyed and energy is matter

when molecules collide and destory one another and photons are

emitted isnt energy created ??? or anytime something emits photons

isnt that energy being created ???

i understand that but does that theory apply

to the situation that i hear about all the time which is

how somebody supposedly had a breif dream about a place

or pictured themselves ina a place they've never been to before

in some kind of event or situation like a dinner party etc then like 7 days later

they are some how in that eaxct situation in that exact place

does what you are saying apply to this

i kno wat it is but what causes it

like how it is possible to see your self in a place

or situation then actually being in that place or situation

in the future ????? i have a theory but i want to hear yours

thnx

i understand and im feelin your quote lol

i know this topic doesnt to this area of the forum

but im pretty sure you guys can answer it

specifically what is a "hybrid tactical nuclear weapon"