bloodhound
-
Posts
1996 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by bloodhound
-
-
lol . thats a lot.
I have about 11 hrs a week of lectures and about 3 hours of problem class and 1 hour group tutorial a week. but i never go. i got told off for not attending problem classes at all.
0 -
yeah. newton raphsons method is much much faster. but the function must be nice and several conditions must be satisfied for convergence to the solution ure looking for .
0 -
I think, if u descrive the events properly, and then bang in the numbers in the bayes therom, or theorem of total probability, u get the answer. but i am to lazy to do anything like that.
0 -
Maths is Nottingham is also one of the best if u look at the tables. The timetable is very light though. so thats good. i have a fren who studies maths at imperial. also another frens roommate also does maths. and when i look at the work they get and their timetable, i thank god that i went to nottingham.
0 -
but what is the condition of e so that it loses mga of energy each bounce
0 -
i often dont go to bed at all so that i wont get up late and miss the exams. i did that two days in a row. ... and i needed to revise badly as well. i once went to lecture about 2 mins before it finished. just because i had to hand in a probability assignment. that module is over now. have statistics and mathematical structurs now. along with the core modules.
0 -
VECTOR spaces is probably the most interesting. Its absolutely mind boggling when u think about it.
0 -
i used to love stats at A-level. but now its just boring. maybe the lecturer is boring. so many tests to learn. we get huge blocks of lecture notes. and i often miss the lectures cos i am too lazy to wake up at 11 am
0 -
Because i am doing a project on bouncing balls, i am also looking at a situation where the ball bounces down a stair.
What i need, is to find out the required value of e for this question
ok , u have a ball bouncing down a stair. forget about the horizontal stuff, u can either think of it as looking head on to the stairs. or imagine a ball bouncing on a surface, but after each bounce the surface moves down a fixed height. basically a stair. u get me rite.
if u look at the graph. we DROP a ball at rest from height H, and the ball as coeff of restitution e, all i want is the condition for e so that the blue heights are equal. or equivalently the brown heights are equal. i would prefer the blue heights.
Take the height of the steps to be "a" or any letter u like
anyway . cheers
0 -
glad to be of some help. hows maths in warwick. i heard its one of the best. was having a look at some of u problems in the competition sections. quite good questions.
0 -
Since pple have asked this question before in other forums. ill post my solution to it anyway
take a function f where f (x)=ln(x)/x
therefore a^b=b^a if and only if f(a)=f(b). now differentiating f(x) u will find that there is a maximum at x=e. therefore the function f is increasing for x<e and decreasing for x>e. therefore its not possible for both a,b <e or a,b >e cos then f(a) will never be equal to f(b) for a<b
so the only solutions possible is a<e and b>e . now we have 0<a<e. and a is an integer. therefore a=1 or a=2. putting in a=1 we get b=1 which is not a solution as we need a<b. the only other soultion is a=2. puting in a=2 and solving f(b)=f(2) by similar method or however u want we get b =4 . therefore the only solution to a^b=b^a for 0<a<b is a=2,b=4
0 -
anyway. i did this question for integer solution of a^b=b^a given 0<a<b
here it is
take a function f where f (x)=ln(x)/x
therefore a^b=b^a if and only if f(a)=f(b). now differentiating f(x) u will find that there is a maximum at x=e. therefore the function f is increasing for x<e and decreasing for x>e. therefore its not possible for both a,b <e or a,b >e cos then f(a) will never be equal to f(b) for a<b
so the only solutions possible is a<e and b>e . now we have 0<a<e. and a is an integer. therefore a=1 or a=2. putting in a=1 we get b=1 which is not a solution as we need a<b. the only other soultion is a=2. puting in a=2 and solving f(b)=f(2) by similar method or however u want we get b =4 . therefore the only solution to a^b=b^a for 0<a<b is a=2,b=4
i dont think its possible to find a general solution for x^y=y^x. something do with trascendental numbers and fucntions
1 -
yeap; the previous post has said everything i was about to say in this one.
oh i love maths so much
have a look at some sequences where the denominators tend to 0 . u will find that the limit of the sequence doesnt have to be infinity.
0 -
Anyway. I am a Maths Student at University of Nottingham. Just about to finish my first year. Have exams in may/june. Ok then. introductions over, ill give u a started question:
Find all integer solutions for ab=ba given that 0<a<b.
Its a really nice question I found in a book. It has a nice solution as well.
ooh dont bother with that question. i see that its been asked in other sub forums
HEHE
anyway later
0
Ideas
in Mathematics
Posted
the problem is there are too many forums and sub forums in here. so it takes ages to browse everything
me and my mate have a forum at
http://www.marrouche.net/forum we also discuss mathematics there.