Jump to content


  • Posts

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Kojiami

  1. Why can't you fold spacetime? Everyone says it's impossible, but why? Is it energy required? lack of technology?
  2. Yes, but energy (Usually) doesn't have mass. So matter generally makes gravity, since all matter has mass.
  3. It takes matter to make gravity. It takes gravity to make a singularity. It takes a singularity to create an event horizon. Common logic, so it's assumable there would be matter in there.
  4. So instead of a singularity made of antimatter, you'd get a singularity made of gamma photons?
  5. Just a thought i've had, what if you had enough antimatter mass for it to collapse in itself like a black hole? I mean, i know you'd get a black hole made of antimatter, but what if you threw matter at it then? Would it anihilate, breaking down the event horizon, or would the matter get completly ripped apart and not do anything?
  6. What if you created ONE gargantuan atom, with such ammounts of electrons spinning you can actually use this one atom material?
  7. What if you extended it at an extremely slow rate, where you only added say, atom by atom? It would take an incredibly long time (billions of years), but nothing wrong with theory...
  8. The ammount of data needed for such a thing... That would exceed a googolplex of gigabyte.. If strings exist, there would be over 10^500 in as much as a human body.. Would you make one string one bit of information, that would exceed the ammount of information capable to be stored you would get if you used all earths resources to make harddrives...
  9. Yes, yes, we know, to accelerate to light speed you need infinite energy. We figured that much. But what if you actually didn't accelerate? Now most theories involve things like hyperspace, timespace tears, etc. My idea is to use rotation. Now, if you would normally have a super-light weight stick of say, 5,000,000,000 miles, you could rotate it very fast with relative ease. Let's say the "Stick" is 1 KG heavy for speculation. However.. The energy needed to accelerate at light speed would keep increasing, making it's relative mass higher and higher. Even if the end tip would be spinning at 290,000 KM/second, it would be around 1,3 KG. But the closer you approached C, it would be heavier.. At a speed of 299,999.999.999 it would already be over 6000 megatons... This is because the rotation needs to accelerate. But.. what if you used an extendable chain, and extended it while already having the rotation present? This way, no energy would be needed for the acceleration, only for maintaining the rotation. For example, let's say we have a 0,1 LY long chain of super-light material. Extend this chain 10 meters, and get it to a speed that will equal C2 if at chain length of 0,1 LY. Then, just extend it. The energy needed for maintaining the rotation will be pretty large, but acceleration energy will remain null because the rotation speed remains equal. Now, please tell me why this couldn't work? I'm sure it couldn't or someone would already have thought of it -.-.
  10. So, basically a clusterf*ck of elementary particles.
  11. The very matter that caused the big bang, the singularity that existed before this univserse came in existance. What exactly was this? Was it atoms completly squashed into eachother, to the point all particles were directly "Squeezed" together? Was it just random particles together (Gluons, neutrons, ions, muons, quarks, hell, even tachyons), just clusterf*cked together? Or was it 1 single atom of an infinite mass? (Infinite electrons / protons)
  12. When a comet passed jupiter, it's gravitational effects (however small on earth) were noticed, but it's view through a telescope was delayed because light travels at C. By calculations, the comet's vision delay was noticable, yet there was no gravitational delay. As for the conserved energy, energy can easily go at speeds that near C. If the energy would be scattered fast enough, the gravity fluctuation would still happen.
  13. A "True" gravity speed has never been proven, check wikipedia. The gravity fields "Dent" in spacetime at C. Only the "full" power of the gravity dent is reached at value C, but the effects are instantly noticable. Say, if i made a gravity field here, it would be noticable at an infinitely small force over an infinitely small time.
  14. Umm, no. Gravity fields change outside speed limitations, and if you can disperse total mass energy (done by anihilating it), the gravity field will change. Since the energy gained by anihilation is easily dispersable at at least 5-10% of C, it's perfectly possible to anihilate matter.
  15. Umm, you mean a spaceship that is made to fight protons? Why would you want a spaceship for that? -.-;; be specific thank you.. -.-;
  16. Yeah, i'm sure that's provable, i assume the event horizon doesn't count for you?
  17. How, you ask? Well, i figured out how to do FTL communication. It's not realistic at the moment (Since the power needed for it would just be too great.). The idea is to use powerfull gravity, and make fast fluctuations in mass that causes the gravity, and measure the fluctuations in gravity where you're sending the message. Of course, do directly change the mass of something, you need to get rid of matter, which is impossible. But there is a backdoor around this: Antimater. Bombard the high-density matter with antimatter, causing it to anihilate (Meaning it is turned into energy, changing the mass.). The technical problem here is creating enough antimatter. If you would put all world resources into making antimatter, you'd end up with a couple million years to create one gram (Not to mention, it has to be stored in a place with absolutly no matter, since it anihilates otherwise.) Bombarding high-density matter with antimatter will reduce it's total mass, changing it's gravitational field. Since gravitation is not speed bound, the fluctuations will be measurable anywhere without the limitation of time. Example: At proxima Centauri (Closest star to the sun, 4 lightyears away), you set up a gravity detecting machine, and calibrate it to these mass fluctuations. Next, you bombard a high-density matter with antimatter, changing it's gravity field. The machine at proxima centauri detects this instantly (gravitation changes are instant), and therefore reads a "message" of gravitation pulses without being bound by time. You could do this at any distance, you could even use it to communicate between superclusters... Of course, this doesn't solve the problem of actually transporting matter faster then light.. But i'm sure this could be useful in the far future. Comments?
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.