gentleman-farmer

Klaynos gf) Only to those who read the Internet and not the book the Ancient Egyptian Pyramid Texts- wherein Dr. R. O. Faulkner is very clear and differentiates between corn and other grains 1.) they give to him barley, emmer, (a wheat), bread, and beer 2.) the Imperishable Stars in the north of the sky, who rule over offerings and protect the reaped corn 3.) (from the Book of the Dead) I will eat it under the branches of the tree of Hathor my mistress, who made offering of bread, beer and corn gf /

Here is a website that correctly identifies the fraction with the glyph, but I cannot confirm the association with the Pyramid Texts that is suggested thereon http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/archive.cgi/noframes/read/165246 In Robins & Shute's The Rhind Mathematical Papyrus (p 14) they state that the progression is represented by the equation S = 1/2[1-(1/2)^6]/(1 - 1/2) Where S = the first term I don't agree with that because it does not agree with the statements in the defining ancient text, nor does it clearly define the missing 1/64! Another progression would follow this equation S = 1/(2)^n where n = 1 to 6, by example when n = 6, S = 1/64 I don't agree with that either because the equation does not clearly define the missing 1/64 Robins & Shute state (p 15) The Egyptians would have been able to sum the series to 6 terms I agree w/ that gf /

Klaynos gf) Yes that is correct Klaynos gf) I don't understand your question! Are you asking about evidence relating to the symbols and fractions? Or about planetary accretion? Jupiter and The Eye of Horus is also about planetary accretion, but the thread got so entangled with other stuff that it never really developed. In my opening statement I wrote that I wrote that (even tho they are both about planetary accretion) because the Eye of Horus is Egyptian while the Wedjat Eye is not

Klaynos gf) The glyphs are the symbol for the fraction that is displayed. By example, the circle in the center is the glyph for the fraction 1/4. The icon as a whole represents a process The process depicts planetary accretion You might respond negatively to that suggestion - but that is what it is - believe otherwise and it'll remain a mystery for another 1000 years

DJBruce gf) The CAPTION reads

Let me understand this correctly - you want me to solve a 5000 year old mystery for you because you ask - while you give nothing? All anyone has to do is start solving it. Until I told you - you didn't even know it had a solution, you didn't know it had a parallel in an ancient text, you didn't know it wasn't Egyptian. All anyone has done is demand that they be given something for nothing - and to give it to them before others have had a chance to think on it I even told you what book and on which page it could be found (p 14 of Gay Robins & Charles Shute's The Rhind Mathematical Papyrus ISBN 0 7141 0944 4) gf /

Sisypus gf) Sisypus, have you ever read the book, or are you guessing? Dr R. O. Faulkner clearly makes the distinction between corn and grain (barley is written 17 times, and emmer, a wheat is written 13 times ) - and I don't have to guess to say so And this mural clearly shows a corn field gf /

DJBruce gf) Not without giving some worthy person the chance first - but like all truly ancient material the solution is in the ancient literature gf /

DJBruce gf) Think of it this way -- If you'd had anything constructive to say - you've had two chances to say it

This is the way it is – all the respondents on my Eye of Horus and celestial grid posts professed to know more than Dr. R. O Faulkner, author of the Ancient Egyptian Pyramid Texts - So tiring of the constant Internet superiority gig by folk here that never read the book, I decided to post something that isn't on the Internet. If they can solve it than good for them Perhaps, on the other hand, it will draw some professionals and we can have a decent Internet free, accusation free, conversation about a real mystery that has a real solution gf /

The Wedjat Eye of Horus is not a lineage of the Eye of Horus - nor was it Egyptian. If you add the fractions, they add up to 63/64. This has an been an enigma for thousands of years. We see the first instance of this unique pre-pyramid age Icon on p 14 of Gay Robins & Charles Shute's The Rhind Mathematical Papyrus ISBN 0 7141 0944 4 The why of the missing 1/64 can be solved - as a friend and I solved it years ago

OFF CELESTIAL GRID TOPIC FOR A MOMENT Cap'n you once asked me about a solar orbital forces project that I'd been involved with. It was a fascinating study and answers a lot of questions that are otherwise ignored If we can open a thread and keep the subject focused I think you'd enjoy the experience

Dr. R. O. Faulkner's Pyramid Texts

sisyphus gf) Dr. R. O. Faulkner was the leading modern British authority on the progressive stages of funerary texts and it's in his books that we find the word corn, he clearly distinguishes it from emmer (a wheat) and barley -- and it‘s on the ancient Egyptian murals that we see it reaped (i.e., harvested) The Internet error between emmer and corn was clearly a typo sisyphus gf) I've quoted Dr. R. O. Faulkner's Pyramid Texts to demonstrate that the first instance of heliacal rising and celestial grids was made over 5000 years ago and that their structuring of it is no different than that of today - the language is different but so too is it between British and American English

ATTENTION head moderator Would you, or someone PLEASE inform mooeypoo that it would be nice if she was certain of her facts before posting moderator comments in the thread, by example she posted a moderator item about celestial grids and helical rising requiring peer review, and more recently about my re-posting an item I wrote myself so that I could clear up a mistake made by Insane-alien thank you

Insane-alien gf) wheat and barley are referred to as corn? By who? mooeypoo gf) You keep making mis-takes mooeypoo - I repeated my statement from my post 30 because Insane_alien had mis-read it

Insane-alien You are just plain wrong. You should learn to recognize a typo Here is what I wrote in my post 30 ... emmer (a form of wheat Here is the Internet TYPO that makes no sense Here is the corrected Internet typo

Insane_alien gf) Insane_alien it might be a very good idea if you read for understanding - and not to find a launch pad for something you know nothing about - it'd be easier for you to identify typos that way! Read the quote carefully - you'll note that corn as a type of emmer was a typo- they very clearly state later that they are speaking of wheat PART 1 1/2 of 3 Here we'll see how the reed floats were taken up to the sky The reed-floats of the sky are set down for Re by the Day-bark. That Re may cross on them to Harakhti at the horizon. The reed-floats of the sky are set down for Harakhti by the Night-bark DEFINITIONS: .. ascend with Isis, rise with the Day-bark I have come to you, O Nephthys; I have come to you, O Night-bark gf

PART 1 1/2 of 3 Here we'll see how the reed floats were taken up to the sky The reed-floats of the sky are set down for Re by the Day-bark. That Re may cross on them to Harakhti at the horizon. The reed-floats of the sky are set down for Harakhti by the Night-bark DEFINITIONS: .. ascend with Isis, rise with the Day-bark I have come to you, O Nephthys; I have come to you, O Night-bark

PART 1 1/2 of 3 These passages tell us how the lines of the grid (called reed-floats) were set in the sky DEFINITIONS: .. ascend with Isis, rise with the Day-bark I have come to you, O Nephthys; I have come to you, O Night-bark

Now what do you suppose these things might be called? NO! Not a reaper please no! Oh My / / / CAPTION A-View-of-the-First-McCormick-Reaper-of-1831 gf /

JohnB without researching his response wrote :: gf) Bad guess JohnB -- Reap simply means to harvest -- I farmed corn and hay for over 20 years - and we reaped corn that whole time So have these people CAPTION http://www.victorianweb.org/history/work/2.html Also Emmer wheat (Triticum dicoccum), also known as farro especially in Italy, is a low yielding, awned wheat. It was one of the first crops domesticated in the Near East. It was widely cultivated in the ancient world, but is now a relict crop in mountainous regions of Europe and Asia. Bad guess JohnB And please observe the tool in the reapers hand in this image

Sisyphus gf) Not true - and there was no confusion with other cereal crops -- corn is mentioned five (5) times in the Book of the Dead, twice in the Pyramid Texts and the cereal crops emmer (a form of wheat; 12 times), barley (20 times), are all mentioned specifically - The Columbus notion is pure myth (do you people ever research your comments before posting them?) CAPTION http://www.reshafim.org.il/ad/egypt/timelines/topics/harvesting_grain.htm gf

Klaynos gf) I'll leave you with that misguided notion - But if anyone to give it an ounce of credibility they'd have to ignore Newton, Einstein, Kepler, and Pasteur while noting that Dr R. O. Faulkner was the leading modern British authority on the progressive stages of funerary texts developed in antiquity (in contrast who is Klaynos?) And for klaynos to suggest that the work of Dr R. O. Faulkner is up great debate, is the height of arrogance (particularly considering that Klaynos never read the book) And the fact that Klaynos responded to very complex text in just eight minutes says a whole bunch beyond his actual words gf (Please read and familiarize yourself with the following terminology - it relates to the full text in quotes thank you) a.) reed-floats ::: lines of celestial latitude and longitude (i.e., meridians) b.) Re ::: the sun - but also the daylight hours (horizon to horizon) c.) Harakhti ::: the nighttime equivalent of Re and the nighttime hours (horizon to horizon) d.) panther-skin ::: the star studded sky e.) "me" - two directions are implied - when it is just "Re" it is northward and refers to the polar regions where the meridians converge. Where it is"Harakhti and to Re" It is southward from the polar regions toward the equator (see note 1. for the passage that defines this (quote "Companions who cross the sky") NOTE 1. keep in mind that from the polar regions you can observe all compass points, "awning" means the polar skies, and the "two Court yards" refers to the sun-lit half of the earth, and the night side) ,