Quantoman

@ sayonara

its like he can turn the lag on and off at will...

it mainly lags harder when i am a head in points.

where as the lag is mild turns into blinking disconnect

icon in the cornner.

i thnik 1veedo is right on the money, this person has

mentioned use a hotkey in a sarcastic way.

@1veedo

how do you make a hotkey?

pls explain, my knowlegde of computer

is knowing where's the on off button.

p.s. moderator pls move this thread to computer help...

i play a online shooting game.

basically lag free until a certain

person joins the game... he in

some way lags down my computer

i have t1 connection speed and my

ping hovers around 34 - 24.

how can it be possible for him to basically

shut down my connection?

all of my movements are at 1/2-1 second

delay.

and it appears that he doesnt have any lag.

is it possible to counter this attact?

btw, i have a 3.4 gh cpu with fsb @ 800mbs

and a 256mb nvidia geforce 6800, also

1gig of ram...

i also have a netgear router...

I had speculated that Black Holes are inverted light

but i guess i was wrong.

It looks like in 2007 at the CERN Large Hadron Collider

there will be an experiment conducted to attemp a

recreation of a Black Hole.

They plan to blast two PROTONS together with enough

energy to make them rip apart the fabric of spacetime.

Until then i guess we can still SPECULATE if Black Holes

exist....

how do u delete a post?

i think plasma is the answer with a magnetic shield

to contain also for protection. it could be possible

within approx 20yrs. as fuel cells get denser could

potentially provide the energy needed.

can u say, "i am your father"?

Well i guess i was wrong...

It looks like in 2007 at the CERN Large Hadron Collider

there will be an experiment conducted to attemp a

recreation of a Black Hole.

They plan to blast two PROTONS together with enough

energy to make them rip apart the fabric of spacetime.

Until then i guess we can still SPECULATE if black holes

exist

Could it be possible to make a working lightsaber for use like in the star wars movies?

Does anyone have any idea of what ethnicity Isaac Newton was?

qick give me a blood sample of his and i'll tell the truth...

There is no way that kind of beta decay (sounds like it would be beta decay anyway) would form nearly enough anti-matter to be of any use. The vast vast vast VAST majority of it would just hit some particle nearby an annhilate itself.

-i think we all know this already...its was hypothetical reasoning... key word here is (IF) we could get a satellite close enough to the sun it would be better to try to collect antimatter.

How is anti-matter created from looping eruptions? (I assume you are reffering to solar flares) Regardless, it would suffer from the same difficulty of there being too much matter around for the anti-matter to collide with.

-yes i was reffering to solar flares.

And how could you filter out matter? You would have to somehow filter protons and atomic nuclei (which are positively charged, like positrons) as well as any free electrons, which are the same mass as positrons. Seems hard to filter. Plus your filtration system couldn't use much energy, otherwise you'd end up using more energy to filter then you would gain from the anti-matter.

 

And if we want to go into technicalities, how do you propose actually getting usable energy from the anti-matter?

-now if i answer any of those questions you would have to pay my way through a physics degree, until then i will let u ponder those question.

-again hypothetically if we some how can figure out how to get close enough to the sun with out blowing up, and firgure out how to fliter out matter from

antimatter we will have a good source of energy.

plain and simple....

Light isn't converted back into mass.

Photons raise the energy level of atoms and electrons. Now if e =mc(sq) applies to normal and raised electron (two different energies) how is the other side of the equation altered without changing m?

although that maybe true in this universe... what happens in a black

whole is any body's guess. after light enters a black hole i think it

turns into mass.

Why do you think Indians seem to prefer pale skin to dark skin? A whole industy has grown up in India around making people paler, and many top Indian models are of European ancestry. Is this a product of colonialism? The Ayran (Iranian Aryan, not Nazi Aryan) conquests? Association of dark skin with maual labour? A combination?

-i think its just a case of the grass is greener on the other side.

-you could also ask why do pale skin people want darker skin? Here in the USA there is also a whole industy around making pale skin people darker, its called tanning, its too has grown recently. maybe due to pop culture or UV rays emitted, how ever way u want to reason it; it still occurs...

-i think it just a product of not being secure with your self, being dark or pale...

i should have posted there in the first place...

sigh the ignorance, i will know better in the future.

hi all.

ya what he^ said....

__________________

free thinkers need debunkers and debunkers need free thinkers

As far as I know no antimatter is emitted from the sun, I dont see how it would be since it would have to be created apart from any mater for it to make it away from the sun. Then if you captured it in a magnetic field you would also caputure all the normal matter charged particles of which there are many.....

-antimatter is when a high-energy proton in a solar flare collides with carbon, It can form a type of nitrogen that has too many protons relative to its number of neutrons, This makes its nucleus unstable, and a positron is emitted to stabilize the situation.

-Looping eruptions on the Sun create antimatter.

-i am sure if we would attempt to collect the antimatter with a magnetic trap

we would also know that it would have to filter out matter...

___________________

free thinkers need debunkers and debunkers need free thinkers

Whilst mass = light could be true it also could not be true. Let me explain; it's correct because as Einstein showed mass and energy are the same thing. As light is energy you could conclude that mass and light are the same. However this isn't always correct because there are other forms of energy. So mass could = light but it could also = some other form of energy. Consequently you cannot always say mass = light.

-pls enlighten me, what are the other forms of energy?

By that do you mean pair production? ie. when a very high energy photon splits into a particle and an antiparticle? You cannot get light converting only into an antiparticle, it always converts in pairs (ie. particle+anti).

-yes, and ok...

And don't be rude about JPQuiceno, maybe calling this "crazy talk" offended you, but you did just come here talking about "inverted light" and you did not initially explain it.

-for one, crazy people say crazy things, and i am crazy so no offense

taken, i thought it was just playful banter from the south park gallery.

I was not trying to be rude, just a playful rebut.

I think maybe you should stop explaining your "inverted light" and start learning the difference between light and matter and the relationship between the 2. You clearly already know a bit, but then you also clearly do not know it all, unless you can simply and properly explain this "inverted light" it may be a better use of your time to learn the physics and then one day you'll be able to answer your own question if you still understand it.

-one, if u stop asking me to explain it than i will...when i came into this form

i was expecting u all to tell me why this was not possible, and u have.

-two, this is just a hobbie form me i have no intention to learn more about

this subject as a profession... and if did i am sure i would answer my own question and maybe someday prove it.

-three, no wasted time here for me, but maybe for u, i got what i was looking for with little effort on my part.

again thanks...

__________________

free thinkers need debunkers and debunkers need free thinkers.

but it would be worth it?

so anyone from cali?

p.s. i am new

a magnetic trap?

would it be better to try to collect the antimatter from the

sun? i think it would be worth the effort and energy if we

could get a pound of that stuff.

i will not elaborate for u but I will attempt to cheaply be humorus...

what did the bird say when flying over JPQuiceno head????

Cheap, Cheap, Cheap.... LOL

@5614

-from what i gather all forms of E.M. radiation are created when an atom or molecule drops from a higher energy state to a lower one. The loss of energy which occurs is emitted in the form of radiation with an energy which matches this drop. energy from mass = light.

-when light is converting back into mass i was referring to antimatter.

-the event is when light reverse its polarity back to its source, which

as a result may coverting back into mass (possibly as antimatter).

i would like to say thanks for your questions. It has given me more of insight on the properties of light i was not aware of. thats exactly why i started this

thread.

@JPQuiceno

LOL- i have a homework assignment for u. look up the word

novice and post it here__________. also while your at it look

up the word COULD__________.

@the geek

i believe that a photon is the only particle that can be at

two places at once.

First off let me say that i am a novice

on this topic. This is something that

has been bothering me for a few mons.

now and when i try to talk about it i

always get puzzled stares.

I posted my postulation in this forum

hoping that others would explain why

this COULD not be... So pls take it

apart but pls explain why.

@cap'n refsmmat and 5614

There is no such thing as inverted light

but only in my head.

To me inverted light = a black hole...

-light is converted mass, and there are

events in the cosmos where light has been

converted back into mass.

-time is the governing factor. it slows

when mass is at the speed of light, and

i believe it also has a effect on light

because light was once mass.

-if light could be slowed by time what is

the reaction... it could be light but in a

different form. a dense form of light that

instead of moving outward it would move

inward to the source, and accumulate until

enough energy for a reverse big bang.

-with this event the massive energy might

produce speeds faster than light, mass

can infintely expand, and time is dilated

to a sand still.

-by which as a result creating another

or sub universe. becomming a full circle

of creation....

@lazerfazer

u are correct basically.

did u ever find out anything

from your teacher?

@imasmartgirl

it could be but can you elborate

a little more.

@atheist

can u tell me why inverted light

can not be?

@scientistsahai

you are 100% correct...????

@klaynos

LOL...

@ophiolite

imagination is a superior form of thinking...

maybe 1000 years from now i will be proven

correct, generally speaking with out being

hasty...

@j.c. macswell

LOL... (a-hole) thats funny

@sunspot

the energy could be leaking out into a sub universe.

@all thank you for your response it is better than the one

i am use to...(i dont know) and pls continue to explain

why inverted light can not be.

peace

i think that a black hole is gravity at

its highest level (of course) and it

is simply inverted light. The super star

has accumulated so much mass by

producing light that it cause the light

to slow down enough to convert it back

into mass inverting on its self, not by

running out of fuel. Which produces

a hole in the space faberic at speeds

faster than light.

the mass is infintely expanded creating

massive amount of pull.

This is base on light being mass at the

speed of light and mass attracts mass