hemantc007

you were not able to prove those evidence (evidence in the videos ) scientifically ........i am not against NASA ........but i want to know how , can i see things from different angle , for that you have to prove it ....!!!!!!!!!!!!1

Einstein's problem

Albert Einstein supposedly said that 98% of the people in the world couldn't solve this one:

There are 5 houses sitting next to each other, each with a different

color, occupied by 5 guys, each from a different country,

and with a favorite drink, cigarette, and pet. Here are the facts:

The British occupies the red house.

The Swedish owns a dog.

The Danish drinks tea.

The green house is on the left of the white house.

The owner of the green house drinks coffee.

The person who smokes "Pall Mall" owns a bird.

The owner of the yellow house smokes "Dunhill".

The owner of the middle house drinks milk.

The Norwegian occupies the 1st house.

The person who smokes "Blend" lives next door to the person who owns

a cat.

The person who owns a horse live next door to the person who

smokes "Dunhill".

The person who smokes "Blue Master" drinks beer.

The German smokes "Prince".

The Norwegian lives next door to the blue house.

The person who smokes "Blend" lives next door to the person who drinks

water.

The question is: Who owns the fish?

Don't spoil it!

original post by ray ( sciseek.com)

i have the answer

can you do it:-)

it is very difficult to under stand what you mean ,but it seems that it might be correct............you have broaden you thinking in some part ..........

If you broaden your thinking more ,then you will find that it is not necessary that every thing should have end and begin-ing ................it is just our thinking that make us fell or understand that things should have end and begin-ing.

this is approx. what my theory is about....never mind

above are just my thought ,which might be right or in wrong ......if you are really making a new theory then go on with what you are thinking , take advise from other but don't take them deeply ..........

yes that is indeed correct .....that is its relative velocity.......!!!!!!

I got the answer for both ones

in the first one you have to make 3 sets of 3 coin ...it is same as the above mentioned

in the second you have to make sets of coin as eg :- let one be stack "a" other be "b"similarly ther will be a,b,c,d,e,f,g,h,i,j

then make 2 set , in which first has 9 coin of a =A9, similarly series will be

A10 , B9 , C8 , D7 , E6 , F5 , G4 , H3 , I2 , J1 total mass =55g

and similarly other series

B 1, C2 , D3 , E4 , F5 , G6 , H7 , I8 , J9 total mass = 45g

now weigh them on the machine ( any one of the above series) then you will know that which one is fake due to amount of mass increase ........for eg in first series if total mass is 55.8g that mean the c stack is the fake one.......

quite easy one .........!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

i think that it does not matter that you are at the equator ...

and about the motion of the the rocket in the same direction of earth is also not difficult because gravity is not depend upon the spin of the earth..

it just seems difficult because your perception of view is form earth ....

but you should know that rocket which you are launching has the same motion, velocity, direction as of yours ( due to inertia ) like a ball passed to other in a moving system (train, bus,etc)............

dreams are non sense because they just show non- sense .....

have you ever thought about your dreams .........when you try to make sense out of that ,it just can't you can not link events in you dream. For eg i saw is dream in which , i was in a house (not mine) but still , it was as if in you data base it is fixed that it is you home ...in second i open the door and there is a cow , she ran behind me i went to a big storie building , and the non sense part is that the coww also came there......

it all is just none sense........

pretty interesting question.....

but ....i think that emotions are useless they are just pain in the brain .....they are unnecessary .......remove it (block it) then you brain will be much free , and think much broadly .......

Can some one tell me , where i can read or download the original copy of this book................. i am not getting the original copy of it ....

plz...........help............!!!

Dichotomy: Anybody that tries to start a thread again on this subject in the future should have it shut down immediately by a moderator.

that is bulll shit...............

because i think that debates are very useful

(except the non-sense debates like "who should be dominating male or female" , "technology good or bad" because they have no end and you can not go either side ,as both are important .. )

you might not be knowing that in a debate both side of parties are in profit ( if they want to have it )...........you are getting more knowledge to decide for your self what is right and wrong........

my motive in this debate is that ,i should get to know how those evidence can be disproved with proper scientific explanation (other perspective of view {thinking})

I wan to expand my knowledge , by in taking more and more information.

but till now i have got very less info like "moon reflecting surface responseble for not seeing stars (might be)" and some more .......

i request to give proper scientific reason like mention above..........

good said dichotomy......

i fully agree with you.

IF they prove it then ,i will agree to it , that man landed on moon ( atleast once)........................!!!!!!!!!

sorry every one it is "not" in my above post.....it should be "" by this it is clear that using mind we can not move things or to those kind of thing "".........

hey.......... i have hard about "bermuda triangle " ,when i was of age 13 .......then i saw a video on it ,they have a scientific theory which explain almost every thing like missing ships(how they were disroyed ) and big waves in sea and also plane missing .................it say that under the sea there are stones of solid methane , which when disturbed it give out methane (heavy ) gas when this amounts to too much then it creates big wave which act as a storm ,.............and they submerge...........

for planes and jet ....they catch fire due to methane in air............i don't remember much be there is also some thing which block radar waver and gams connection signal.

did you notice errors in the image like the cross camera , clear images in dark shado ,survival in extream low and high tem. ,also two shadow in different directions. , no star in the sky , still stationary videos ,,, no blast crater ,,, no dust on the stand ,ship came back to earth with no fule and so small blast to left it ...,same area location ,,the crater similar to that on the area 51 ...,,

if all this is lie then tell NASA to clear them all in public one and for all with strong evidence.. and up load images and videos on net so that we can see all of them ...

we will continue this later . i have to go to sleep (it is nigth in india)..........can you give some info of your self now.plz

Merged post follows:

reply man............

i agree with psycho .........and also c one it depends on the purity of water ..like if you dissolve insoluble impurity then it's surface tension decreses on the other hand soluble impurity increases it surface tension.......

do you know that water we drink consist of very small amount D2O(heavy water) and T2O ,and salt to taste ................

Merged post follows:

i agree with psycho .........and also c one it depends on the purity of water ..like if you dissolve insoluble impurity then it's surface tension decreses on the other hand soluble impurity increases it surface tension.......

And also the boiling point depends on the impurity like salt or urine increases its boiling point..........

do you know that water we drink consist of very small amount D2O(heavy water) and T2O ,and salt to taste ................

have you seen those images...........

i saw those images .....i was not talking about those images ..i was talking about those images brought by astronauts from apllo missions with there camera ...........they are suppose to be fake ,have you seen those images............

i do not found any thing in those images (in link frovided by you)..............

i have read about the "buddha" ........but i never came across any such thing , indeed he was a great man concentration ,i do not think buddha was able to such thing becaure it quit near to im possible(but not impossible)and i never came across any such thing .....................any way i you follower of buddha .............

i m telling you the same thing again and again probability is never 1 or 0 ...................i jet it this concept is quit big for you .............i can handl it there this because i m surrounded by such small minded (linear minded) people ............it is noting grate in you .....you have understand this .............i never forced you to take conclusion as "NO"

have a nice day .... bye!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

hoe can you say that part 1 these image are not intrepretated

second part it is very much possible that what image show are not space ship but a stone like the photo taken on mars of a stone looking like a lady

if you are talking about people then tell me what happened to those astronauts which were involved in apllo 11 mission none of them died natural death and max of them died young

and how do you explain the accident before 11 mission

i will post you more inf later ,,it is just that i m sick and tired of typing , i m new in this field never typrd so much and on the other hand my english is bad to .........sorry .!!!!!!!!will be back 2maro

do not think that i lack of inf.........i will be back ..

bey!!!!!!!!!!

i never mentioned that i 100% belive in that "conspiracy theory" and neather do i have any motive to make people think like this .............i mentioned that you are free to take your own conclusion ................it is like if you see only one part of the thing then you can not analyz the reality ...........i just wanted to inform people about the second side the "moon landing"

you should never say that you think is 100% correct because probability is never 1or 0 . it is always between 1-0 that is to mean that you can not be 100% sure of any out come of the event ( until the function in valid )............................!!!!!!!!!

this is none sense . the light reflected by the moon is not enough to block the light of millions of stars , this only works when you are seeing object near each other like the sun ,moon, stars...and on other hand moon is not bright enough ............there are not just 10 or 20 there are many photos like this ............it is just that you don't want to accept it .............

then what will you say about the two source of light that casted shadows in different direction

what about the blast crater not found under the space ship inther there was any kind of dust on the stands on which they were standing ....

what about the space craft came to earth with no fuel and only single small blast

the cross in the image were partialy behind the flag, astronaut, ship etc

when you are talking about there rock sample brought to earth can be brought from rear part of the earth (and they also compase many elemaent that are found on the earth

what about the the space craft accident happned while nill amstrong(pardon me spell mistake) barely survived because it was quite difficult to handle it ...............but still they were able to land on moon as easy as nothing .........

i hardly thinkthat it was possible man to land on moon at that time with that old tecn.

you can not be sure that man reaturned to the earth safely with that deadly radiation in space , it was not only from sun but also from outer space radiation , x ray , cosmic ray . etc.....................

tell me one thing have you seen that video or any kind of that video.........

reply!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1

i do not agree with you ...........i accept mind is important but you are over doing it . to what i think mind and body are interlinked by 1 to1 function

for example b = body , m = mind then function is valid in inverse in such a way

b1 to m1 , b2 to m2 , m1 to m2 and inverse(function )

by this it is clear that using mind we can move things or to those kind of thing

be realistic . although we can not ignore it's probability of happening but it is like p = probability of the event

lim p -) 0 ( ie limit probability tenting to 0, p = 0.0000000000...........1

that is not the point

well first talk about the reflector on the moon ,you would be knowing the area of that reflector it is apprx. ( 15-16)inch . tell me how are we able to hit our lasers at that small area with that accuracy .. and there might be some thing at that point which is reflecting those ray (i guess) ......and the other hand if you say this is true then science must accept that einstein's theory of space time continues , because it also has a strong proof and is useful for GPS and mentaining same time on earth and in the space(satellite)............

talking about the photo they are fake ...........it is just that you do not want to believe them ...........you can see the image of astronaut clear behind the space ship although it is not possible because the source of light is behind the ship.............and you can not see asingle star in the sky ..............all images are clear and perfect.........but with camera attached to there chest it is not possible for an astronaut to take proper and still photo ........

tell me what about the blast crater or the model of the space ship or about the thin foil cover on the ship to protect astronaut from radiation ,were it is clear that human need atleast a thick lead sheald to protect them from solar storm (croma mass ejection) or the deadly radiation from outer space etc.........

is that enough or you want more (i insist you to watch that video first) plz!!!!!!!!!!