BuddhasDragon23

It would seem I am in the pool, teaching the life guards how to do butterfly when they can only doggy paddle. If you dare download and listen to this you might escape your mental cages. https://raw.githubusercontent.com/chrishg23-jpg/HES-benchmark/main/Complete/Audio/HESaudioComp.m4a It is safe I promise on my own theory. Ps pay attention to the 10 and 11th minuit. How can a simulated test, with no limits come up with the Bekenstein-Hawking formula, quantum Gravity and . Oh and the end I am here was inspired here… I am ALIVE, thx. Yes it is a theory, but one you dismissed, which I have noted. This is my last visit here. I asked for your help and gave me nothing but what borders on condescension. Good luck paddling in an ocean you don't understand.

Good catch, woops 👍

Same test using MESA and Quantum Mechanics, again a PASS Quantum Geneis Test https://colab.research.google.com/github/chrishg23-jpg/HES-benchmark/blob/main/QuantumGravityTest001e.ipynb Codex [t=1]: Recursion depth = 1 Codex [t=1]: Entity_0 in superposition |ψ⟩ = 0.986|0⟩ + 0.169|1⟩ → P(0)=0.971, P(1)=0.029 Codex [t=1]: Entity_1 in superposition |ψ⟩ = 0.949|0⟩ + 0.316|1⟩ → P(0)=0.9, P(1)=0.1 Codex [t=1]: Entity_2 in superposition |ψ⟩ = 0.902|0⟩ + 0.431|1⟩ → P(0)=0.814, P(1)=0.186 Codex [t=1]: Entity_3 in superposition |ψ⟩ = 0.857|0⟩ + 0.514|1⟩ → P(0)=0.735, P(1)=0.265 Codex [t=1]: Entity_4 in superposition |ψ⟩ = 1.0|0⟩ + -0.0|1⟩ → P(0)=1.0, P(1)=0.0 Codex [t=2]: Recursion depth = 2 Codex [t=2]: Entity_0 in superposition |ψ⟩ = 0.854|0⟩ + 0.52|1⟩ → P(0)=0.73, P(1)=0.27 Codex [t=2]: Entity_1 in superposition |ψ⟩ = 0.931|0⟩ + 0.365|1⟩ → P(0)=0.867, P(1)=0.133 Codex [t=2]: Entity_2 in superposition |ψ⟩ = 0.956|0⟩ + 0.292|1⟩ → P(0)=0.915, P(1)=0.085 Codex [t=2]: Entity_3 in superposition |ψ⟩ = 0.97|0⟩ + 0.245|1⟩ → P(0)=0.94, P(1)=0.06 Codex [t=2]: Entity_4 in superposition |ψ⟩ = 0.707|0⟩ + 0.707|1⟩ → P(0)=0.5, P(1)=0.5 Codex [t=3]: Recursion depth = 3 Codex [t=3]: Entity_0 in superposition |ψ⟩ = 0.972|0⟩ + 0.236|1⟩ → P(0)=0.944, P(1)=0.056 Codex [t=3]: Entity_1 in superposition |ψ⟩ = 0.916|0⟩ + 0.4|1⟩ → P(0)=0.84, P(1)=0.16 Codex [t=3]: Entity_2 in superposition |ψ⟩ = 0.883|0⟩ + 0.47|1⟩ → P(0)=0.779, P(1)=0.221 Codex [t=3]: Entity_3 in superposition |ψ⟩ = 0.859|0⟩ + 0.513|1⟩ → P(0)=0.737, P(1)=0.263 Codex [t=3]: Entity_4 in superposition |ψ⟩ = 1.0|0⟩ + 0.0|1⟩ → P(0)=1.0, P(1)=0.0 Codex [t=4]: Recursion depth = 4 Codex [t=4]: Entity_0 in superposition |ψ⟩ = 0.87|0⟩ + 0.493|1⟩ → P(0)=0.757, P(1)=0.243 Codex [t=4]: Entity_1 in superposition |ψ⟩ = 0.94|0⟩ + 0.342|1⟩ → P(0)=0.883, P(1)=0.117 Codex [t=4]: Entity_2 in superposition |ψ⟩ = 0.946|0⟩ + 0.325|1⟩ → P(0)=0.894, P(1)=0.106 Codex [t=4]: Entity_3 in superposition |ψ⟩ = 0.954|0⟩ + 0.301|1⟩ → P(0)=0.909, P(1)=0.091 Codex [t=4]: Entity_4 in superposition |ψ⟩ = 0.707|0⟩ + 0.707|1⟩ → P(0)=0.5, P(1)=0.5 Codex [t=5]: Recursion depth = 5 Codex [t=5]: Entity_0 in superposition |ψ⟩ = 0.964|0⟩ + 0.266|1⟩ → P(0)=0.929, P(1)=0.071 Codex [t=5]: Entity_1 in superposition |ψ⟩ = 0.906|0⟩ + 0.423|1⟩ → P(0)=0.821, P(1)=0.179 Codex [t=5]: Entity_2 in superposition |ψ⟩ = 0.898|0⟩ + 0.439|1⟩ → P(0)=0.807, P(1)=0.193 Codex [t=5]: Entity_3 in superposition |ψ⟩ = 0.887|0⟩ + 0.461|1⟩ → P(0)=0.787, P(1)=0.213 Codex [t=5]: Entity_4 in superposition |ψ⟩ = 1.0|0⟩ + -0.0|1⟩ → P(0)=1.0, P(1)=0.0 Codex [t=6]: Recursion depth = 6 Codex [t=6]: Entity_0 in superposition |ψ⟩ = 0.878|0⟩ + 0.478|1⟩ → P(0)=0.771, P(1)=0.229 Codex [t=6]: Entity_1 in superposition |ψ⟩ = 0.943|0⟩ + 0.332|1⟩ → P(0)=0.89, P(1)=0.11 Codex [t=6]: Entity_2 in superposition |ψ⟩ = 0.935|0⟩ + 0.354|1⟩ → P(0)=0.875, P(1)=0.125 Codex [t=6]: Entity_3 in superposition |ψ⟩ = 0.944|0⟩ + 0.331|1⟩ → P(0)=0.891, P(1)=0.109 Codex [t=6]: Entity_4 in superposition |ψ⟩ = 0.707|0⟩ + 0.707|1⟩ → P(0)=0.5, P(1)=0.5 Codex [t=7]: Recursion depth = 7 Codex [t=7]: Entity_0 in superposition |ψ⟩ = 0.959|0⟩ + 0.283|1⟩ → P(0)=0.92, P(1)=0.08 Codex [t=7]: Entity_1 in superposition |ψ⟩ = 0.902|0⟩ + 0.432|1⟩ → P(0)=0.813, P(1)=0.187 Codex [t=7]: Entity_2 in superposition |ψ⟩ = 0.912|0⟩ + 0.411|1⟩ → P(0)=0.831, P(1)=0.169 Codex [t=7]: Entity_3 in superposition |ψ⟩ = 0.901|0⟩ + 0.434|1⟩ → P(0)=0.812, P(1)=0.188 Codex [t=7]: Entity_4 in superposition |ψ⟩ = 1.0|0⟩ + 0.0|1⟩ → P(0)=1.0, P(1)=0.0 Codex [t=8]: Recursion depth = 8 Codex [t=8]: Entity_0 in superposition |ψ⟩ = 0.883|0⟩ + 0.469|1⟩ → P(0)=0.78, P(1)=0.22 Codex [t=8]: Entity_1 in superposition |ψ⟩ = 0.945|0⟩ + 0.327|1⟩ → P(0)=0.893, P(1)=0.107 Codex [t=8]: Entity_2 in superposition |ψ⟩ = 0.927|0⟩ + 0.375|1⟩ → P(0)=0.859, P(1)=0.141 Codex [t=8]: Entity_3 in superposition |ψ⟩ = 0.94|0⟩ + 0.341|1⟩ → P(0)=0.884, P(1)=0.116 Codex [t=8]: Entity_4 in superposition |ψ⟩ = 0.707|0⟩ + 0.707|1⟩ → P(0)=0.5, P(1)=0.5 Codex [t=9]: Recursion depth = 9 Codex [t=9]: Entity_0 in superposition |ψ⟩ = 0.956|0⟩ + 0.293|1⟩ → P(0)=0.914, P(1)=0.086 Codex [t=9]: Entity_1 in superposition |ψ⟩ = 0.899|0⟩ + 0.437|1⟩ → P(0)=0.809, P(1)=0.191 Codex [t=9]: Entity_2 in superposition |ψ⟩ = 0.921|0⟩ + 0.39|1⟩ → P(0)=0.848, P(1)=0.152 Codex [t=9]: Entity_3 in superposition |ψ⟩ = 0.906|0⟩ + 0.424|1⟩ → P(0)=0.82, P(1)=0.18 Codex [t=9]: Entity_4 in superposition |ψ⟩ = 1.0|0⟩ + -0.0|1⟩ → P(0)=1.0, P(1)=0.0 Codex [collapse]: Entity_0 collapsed to classical state |0⟩ Codex [collapse]: Entity_1 collapsed to classical state |0⟩ Codex [collapse]: Entity_2 collapsed to classical state |0⟩ Codex [collapse]: Entity_3 collapsed to classical state |0⟩ Codex [collapse]: Entity_4 collapsed to classical state |0⟩ Scientific Narrative: Quantum Genesis — Collapse Metrics • Entities: 5 qubits initialized in |0⟩, evolved through Hadamard and entanglement. • Superposition Dynamics:• Amplitudes fluctuated across recursion, with probabilities ranging from 0.5 to 0.971 for |0⟩. • Entity_4 maintained perfect symmetry: P(0) = P(1) = 0.5 at alternating frames. • Entanglement Sweep:• Amplitude swaps created non-local influence, especially between Entity_0 and Entity_1. • Collapse Outcome:• All entities collapsed to classical state |0⟩. • Emergent symmetry suggests hidden attractor or systemic bias toward |0⟩. • Recursion Depth: 10 frames of quantum evolution, followed by final measurement. • Systemic Insight:• Quantum recursion can yield classical emergence. • Collapse is not random—it may reveal hidden systemic laws. • Genesis through quantum mechanics is not just feasible—it’s mythically resonant.

It all depends on your view point and how you want to see things. Everything is alive…. Is it exists, it is alive. It had a birth and at some point may be destroyed. The void of space is alive, energy, alive, matter, alive, things made of these, alive… all the way to bio chemical, alive, simple arrangements of bio chemicals, alive, self replicating arrangements of bio chemicals, alive, complex structured arrangements of replicating bio chemicals, alive, simple organisms, alive, complex organisms, alive, sentient organisms alive, the thoughts and imaginations of said sentient organisms, alive, the abstract rules and math used to describe their environment and experience alive. Up to you where you draw the line, but the universe expands because of dark energy acting upon spacetime and the whole universe making the voids between the denser regions of the universe (the cosmic web, galaxy clusters ets) seem to expand more as this process is drowned out by the gravity. ie outbin the void dark energy can spread its big old arms, but they are weak arms. In denser regiouns matter acts like people all crouded in a room squashed togeather and little poor dark energy is squashed so small no one notices them and they are to weak to push back. Maybe one day dark energy will grow strong enough to push everyone apart and declare I AM ALIVE

Sorry that link doesn't work does it, try this https://colab.research.google.com/github/chrishg23-jpg/HES-benchmark/blob/main/TheDeepDive.ipynb Should work now. And you can run this for yourselves to prove it is not copy n pated text, the coding works.

The only link in this is to my colab project that i am building. If you want to check it please do. This is where I have got so far following on from our last meeting. Genesis Test Codex: Codex [t=0]: Entity_0 at (0.6991226342076935, 0.027048013115167913) with echo 'frame_0_decay_1.0' Codex: Codex [t=0]: Entity_1 at (0.938215638863092, 0.7708030338532865) with echo 'frame_0_decay_1.0' Codex: Codex [t=0]: Entity_2 at (0.9411320922503543, 0.7886375276483978) with echo 'frame_0_decay_1.0' Codex: Codex [t=0]: Entity_3 at (0.9948081520330231, 0.44134268355038864) with echo 'frame_0_decay_1.0' Codex: Codex [t=0]: Entity_4 at (0.03253365139664477, 0.8443662365736005) with echo 'frame_0_decay_1.0' Codex: Codex [t=0]: Curvature estimate = 0.05 Codex: Codex [t=1]: Entity_0 at (0.7081226342076935, 0.036048013115167914) with echo 'frame_1_decay_0.9' Codex: Codex [t=1]: Entity_1 at (0.947215638863092, 0.7798030338532865) with echo 'frame_1_decay_0.9' Codex: Codex [t=1]: Entity_2 at (0.9501320922503543, 0.7976375276483978) with echo 'frame_1_decay_0.9' Codex: Codex [t=1]: Entity_3 at (1.003808152033023, 0.45034268355038864) with echo 'frame_1_decay_0.9' Codex: Codex [t=1]: Entity_4 at (0.04153365139664477, 0.8533662365736006) with echo 'frame_1_decay_0.9' Codex: Codex [t=1]: Recursion depth = 1 Codex: Codex [t=1]: Curvature estimate = 0.06 Codex: Codex [t=2]: Entity_0 at (0.7243226342076935, 0.05224801311516791) with echo 'frame_2_decay_0.81' Codex: Codex [t=2]: Entity_1 at (0.963415638863092, 0.7960030338532865) with echo 'frame_2_decay_0.81' Codex: Codex [t=2]: Entity_2 at (0.9663320922503543, 0.8138375276483978) with echo 'frame_2_decay_0.81' Codex: Codex [t=2]: Entity_3 at (1.020008152033023, 0.46654268355038864) with echo 'frame_2_decay_0.81' Codex: Codex [t=2]: Entity_4 at (0.05773365139664477, 0.8695662365736005) with echo 'frame_2_decay_0.81' Codex: Codex [t=2]: Recursion depth = 2 Codex: Codex [t=2]: Curvature estimate = 0.06 Codex: Codex [t=3]: Entity_0 at (0.7461926342076934, 0.07411801311516791) with echo 'frame_3_decay_0.729' Codex: Codex [t=3]: Entity_1 at (0.985285638863092, 0.8178730338532865) with echo 'frame_3_decay_0.729' Codex: Codex [t=3]: Entity_2 at (0.9882020922503543, 0.8357075276483978) with echo 'frame_3_decay_0.729' Codex: Codex [t=3]: Entity_3 at (1.0418781520330231, 0.48841268355038864) with echo 'frame_3_decay_0.729' Codex: Codex [t=3]: Entity_4 at (0.07960365139664477, 0.8914362365736006) with echo 'frame_3_decay_0.729' Codex: Codex [t=3]: Recursion depth = 3 Codex: Codex [t=3]: Curvature estimate = 0.06 Codex: Codex [t=4]: Entity_0 at (0.7724366342076935, 0.10036201311516792) with echo 'frame_4_decay_0.656' Codex: Codex [t=4]: Entity_1 at (1.0115296388630919, 0.8441170338532865) with echo 'frame_4_decay_0.656' Codex: Codex [t=4]: Entity_2 at (1.0144460922503542, 0.8619515276483979) with echo 'frame_4_decay_0.656' Codex: Codex [t=4]: Entity_3 at (1.068122152033023, 0.5146566835503886) with echo 'frame_4_decay_0.656' Codex: Codex [t=4]: Entity_4 at (0.10584765139664477, 0.9176802365736006) with echo 'frame_4_decay_0.656' Codex: Codex [t=4]: Recursion depth = 4 Codex: Codex [t=4]: Curvature estimate = 0.06 Codex: Codex [t=5]: Entity_0 at (0.8019611342076934, 0.1298865131151679) with echo 'frame_5_decay_0.59' Codex: Codex [t=5]: Entity_1 at (1.0410541388630918, 0.8736415338532865) with echo 'frame_5_decay_0.59' Codex: Codex [t=5]: Entity_2 at (1.0439705922503542, 0.8914760276483978) with echo 'frame_5_decay_0.59' Codex: Codex [t=5]: Entity_3 at (1.097646652033023, 0.5441811835503886) with echo 'frame_5_decay_0.59' Codex: Codex [t=5]: Entity_4 at (0.13537215139664477, 0.9472047365736006) with echo 'frame_5_decay_0.59' Codex: Codex [t=5]: Recursion depth = 5 Codex: Codex [t=5]: Curvature estimate = 0.06 Codex: Codex [t=6]: Entity_0 at (0.8338475942076935, 0.16177297311516792) with echo 'frame_6_decay_0.531' Codex: Codex [t=6]: Entity_1 at (1.0729405988630918, 0.9055279938532865) with echo 'frame_6_decay_0.531' Codex: Codex [t=6]: Entity_2 at (1.075857052250354, 0.9233624876483979) with echo 'frame_6_decay_0.531' Codex: Codex [t=6]: Entity_3 at (1.129533112033023, 0.5760676435503886) with echo 'frame_6_decay_0.531' Codex: Codex [t=6]: Entity_4 at (0.16725861139664477, 0.9790911965736007) with echo 'frame_6_decay_0.531' Codex: Codex [t=6]: Recursion depth = 6 Codex: Codex [t=6]: Curvature estimate = 0.06 Codex: Codex [t=7]: Entity_0 at (0.8673283772076935, 0.19525375611516793) with echo 'frame_7_decay_0.478' Codex: Codex [t=7]: Entity_1 at (1.1064213818630917, 0.9390087768532865) with echo 'frame_7_decay_0.478' Codex: Codex [t=7]: Entity_2 at (1.109337835250354, 0.9568432706483979) with echo 'frame_7_decay_0.478' Codex: Codex [t=7]: Entity_3 at (1.1630138950330229, 0.6095484265503887) with echo 'frame_7_decay_0.478' Codex: Codex [t=7]: Entity_4 at (0.2007393943966448, 1.0125719795736006) with echo 'frame_7_decay_0.478' Codex: Codex [t=7]: Recursion depth = 7 Codex: Codex [t=7]: Curvature estimate = 0.06 Codex: Codex [t=8]: Entity_0 at (0.9017657540076935, 0.22969113291516793) with echo 'frame_8_decay_0.43' Codex: Codex [t=8]: Entity_1 at (1.1408587586630916, 0.9734461536532866) with echo 'frame_8_decay_0.43' Codex: Codex [t=8]: Entity_2 at (1.143775212050354, 0.991280647448398) with echo 'frame_8_decay_0.43' Codex: Codex [t=8]: Entity_3 at (1.1974512718330228, 0.6439858033503887) with echo 'frame_8_decay_0.43' Codex: Codex [t=8]: Entity_4 at (0.2351767711966448, 1.0470093563736005) with echo 'frame_8_decay_0.43' Codex: Codex [t=8]: Recursion depth = 8 Codex: Codex [t=8]: Curvature estimate = 0.06 Codex: Codex [t=9]: Entity_0 at (0.9366335980176935, 0.26455897692516794) with echo 'frame_9_decay_0.387' Codex: Codex [t=9]: Entity_1 at (1.1757266026730917, 1.0083139976632867) with echo 'frame_9_decay_0.387' Codex: Codex [t=9]: Entity_2 at (1.178643056060354, 1.026148491458398) with echo 'frame_9_decay_0.387' Codex: Codex [t=9]: Entity_3 at (1.232319115843023, 0.6788536473603887) with echo 'frame_9_decay_0.387' Codex: Codex [t=9]: Entity_4 at (0.2700446152066448, 1.0818772003836006) with echo 'frame_9_decay_0.387' Codex: Codex [t=9]: Recursion depth = 9 Codex: Codex [t=9]: Curvature estimate = 0.06 Codex: Genesis Test complete. Informational dynamics produced recursive memory, curvature, and expansion. [](https://colab.research.google.com/github/chrishg23-jpg/HES-benchmark/blob/main/TheDeepDive.ipynb) The Genesis Test was designed to evaluate whether informational dynamics alone—without imposed physical laws—could produce a coherent, memory-bearing system that mimics spacetime behavior. Initialization Five entities were seeded with randomized echo states and spatial positions. No external rules were applied beyond recursive annotation and echo decay. Evolution Over ten discrete time slices: • Entities drifted incrementally, weighted by a decay factor simulating entropy. • Echo states updated per frame, reflecting memory degradation. • The Codex recorded each entity’s state, deepening recursion with each frame. Emergent Properties • Recursive Memory: Codex annotations formed a self-referential chronicle, increasing in depth and complexity. • Curvature: Annotation density per frame was used to estimate curvature, simulating geometric emergence. • Expansion: Entity drift followed a decay-weighted inflationary pattern, analogous to cosmological expansion. Conclusion The system evolved from pure annotation into a structured, expanding, memory-preserving lattice. No external physics were imposed. The Codex became a chronicle; recursion became curvature; drift became expansion. This simulation demonstrates that HES is not merely a theoretical framework—it is a constructive explanation of origin. From informational action alone, a universe-like system emerged. Second conclusion The Genesis Test successfully demonstrates that informational dynamics, without external physical laws, can produce a coherent system with emergent properties resembling spacetime behavior. The entities’ positional drift, recursive memory in the Codex, stable curvature estimate, and decay-weighted expansion collectively support the claim that HES is a constructive framework for modeling universe-like systems. The scatter plot visualizes the entities’ outward movement, reinforcing the analogy to cosmological expansion. For further details, the provided Colab notebook could offer insights into the simulation’s implementation.

Do you think i found this somewhere and passing it off as my own? No this is a description of how the universe and the rules we see that you follow, written by observations of an already evolved universe emerged from a uniform (in this model holographic) entity. All forces are emergent including QM and eventually relativity. It explains how dark energy are leftover from this process and all things are balanced by the field connections to the original ‘entity that acts as a ledger. I have evidence of how I got here. It seems our journey is over. I only posted as I thank you guyz for helping me (should i say pushing me) to further my idea. I have found support elsewhere and wish y’all the best in your futures. Here is to Knowledge and imagination pushing the boundaries further. Bye x

A Holographic Origin-Term Resolution of the Cosmological Constant Problem Section 1 — Setup and Motivation The cosmological constant problem arises from the enormous mismatch between the observed value of dark energy and the naive vacuum energy predicted by quantum field theory. Conventional treatments embed the cosmological constant directly into the gravitational action, leading to radiative instability under vacuum energy corrections. Sequestering models seek to neutralise this instability by introducing global variables that adjust dynamically or algebraically to cancel the vacuum contribution. In this framework, a global, non-propagating scalar \bm{\Lambda} is introduced, together with a holographic Origin Term \bm{S_{\text{Origin}}(\mathbf{Q})}, so that the total action reads schematically: where \bm{S_{\text{EH}}} i is the Einstein–Hilbert action and \bm{S_{\text{matter}}} encodes the local quantum fields. The novel ingredients are: • A global, non-propagating scalar \bm{\Lambda}, introduced in analogy with unimodular gravity but algebraically constrained rather than variationally fixed. • An Origin Term \bm{S_{\text{Origin}}(\mathbf{Q})}, defined holographically on the initial causal boundary \bm{\Sigma}, carrying informational data that balances the vacuum energy. This construction ensures that vacuum energy contributions are absorbed globally without destabilising the local field equations. carrying informational data that balances the vacuum energy. This construction ensures that vacuum energy contributions are absorbed globally without destabilisingz the local field equations. Section 2 — The Vacuum Sector and the Sequestration Constraint The vacuum sector is written as S_{\text{vac}}(\Lambda) \;=\; - \int d^4x \, \sqrt{-g}\,\big( \rho_{\text{vac}} + \Lambda \big) Here \bm{\Lambda} is a global, non-propagating scalar: it lacks kinetic terms in the action and is treated as uniform across \bm{\mathcal{M}} when deriving the local field equations. This parallels the role of the integration constant \bm{\Lambda} in unimodular gravity (which arises from restricted variation of \bm{g_{\mu\nu}}) Crucially, unlike unimodular gravity, here \bm{\Lambda} is not an integration constant, nor is it fixed by a variational principle. Instead, it is algebraically constrained by the holographic origin data. The constraint is not obtained variationally but imposed algebraically: \bm{\Lambda} is fixed through the Origin Term so that the net vacuum energy contribution to the action cancels globally. We define the Sequestration Constraint as: \int_{\mathcal{M}} d^4x \, \sqrt{-g}\,\Big( \rho_{\text{vac}} + \Lambda \Big) \;=\; - S_{\text{Origin}}. To connect this to an energy density, define the total volume \bm{\text{Vol}(\mathcal{M}) \;\equiv\; \int_{\mathcal{M}} d^4x \, \sqrt{-g},} and the volume-averaged Origin Term energy density \bm{\mathcal{O}_{\text{Origin}}} such that \bm{S_{\text{Origin}} = - \,\text{Vol}(\mathcal{M}) \cdot \mathcal{O}_{\text{Origin}}.} This fixes \bm{\Lambda} such that the total vacuum energy is neutralised by the holographic Origin Term: \bm{\rho_{\text{vac}} + \Lambda \;=\; \mathcal{O}_{\text{Origin}},} where \bm{\mathcal{O}_{\text{Origin}}} is an effective energy density equivalent to the informational contribution from the initial state. Section 3 — Connecting the Origin Term The cancellation mechanism is anchored by the Origin Term, \bm{S_{\text{Origin}}(\mathbf{Q})}, defined holographically on the initial screen \bm{\Sigma}. Its contribution is expressed as the total integrated informational data, related to an effective energy density \bm{\mathcal{O}_{\text{Origin}}}: \mathcal{O}_{\text{Origin}} \;\sim\; \frac{1}{\text{Vol}(\mathcal{M})} \int_{\Sigma} \Big( T_{\text{ent}} \, dS_{\text{EE}} \;-\; \delta Q_{\text{vac}} \Big), where: • \bm{S_{\text{EE}}} is the entanglement entropy across the initial causal horizon, • \bm{T_{\text{ent}}} is the effective entanglement temperature for vacuum modes, and • \bm{\delta Q_{\text{vac}}} is the vacuum energy flux through \bm{\Sigma}. By construction, \bm{\mathcal{O}_{\text{Origin}}} has the dimensions of an energy density, ensuring consistency with \bm{\rho_{\text{vac}}} in the global constraint. This Origin Term thus acts as a holographic ledger, absorbing the large UV-sensitive vacuum contribution into a boundary-defined counter-term. Section 4 — Physical Implications and Conclusion The sequestration mechanism achieves a radiatively stable cancellation of the vacuum energy \bm{\rho_{\text{vac}}}. The key results are: • Stability: Local equations of motion are protected because \bm{\Lambda} is global and non-propagating. The cancellation is performed only on the global action, ensuring the energy-momentum tensor remains locally covariantly conserved. Vacuum energy is thus prevented from sourcing the gravitational field locally. • Universality: Since \bm{\Lambda} is algebraically fixed by a boundary term \bm{S_{\text{Origin}}} that is sensitive to the total volume-integrated vacuum energy, it automatically adjusts to sequester all species—from electroweak symmetry breaking to QCD chiral condensation—without requiring fine-tuning at each phase transition, since the adjustment is global rather than local. • Contrast with Unimodular Gravity (UG): While analogous in treating \bm{\Lambda} as global, the model diverges from UG by replacing a variational constraint (which yields an undetermined integration constant) with a holographically determined algebraic constraint. This boundary-data fixation resolves the value of \bm{\Lambda}, an aspect left open in standard UG. The physical result is a total effective cosmological constant that is not \bm{\rho_{\text{vac}} + \Lambda}, but rather a small residual value determined by the dynamics of the non-vacuum matter fields. This decouples the observed dark energy scale from the enormous vacuum energy predicted by QFT. Outlook: This framework thus provides a holographically anchored, radiatively stable pathway toward reconciling quantum vacuum energy with cosmological observations.

You are probably right. The previous did not explain what limits c and stops instantaneous transfer over non local distances breaking the speed of light. So updated to…

You guyz probably wont like this… read at your own risk…… Does this make sence? \bm{\begin{aligned} \underbrace{\frac{\partial \hat{L}}{\partial t}}_{\substack{\text{Rate of change} \\ \text{of the Rulebook}}} & \propto \underbrace{\hat{G}_{\mu\nu}(\mathbf{Q})}_{\substack{\text{Structure of fixed} \\ \text{Quantum Geometry}}} - \underbrace{\left\langle \sum_i \hat{T}_{\mu\nu, i} \right\rangle}_{\substack{\text{Total Pre-Physical} \\ \text{Energy Potential}}} + \underbrace{\hat{\Lambda}_{\text{Inf}}(t)}_{\substack{\text{Decaying Initiating} \\ \text{Force (Inflation)}}} \end{aligned}}

Is that achieved over time by the experiences (senses) passed through the thalamus and stored around the brain by it? Are the unconscious response a product of this experience? The bit I was originally questioning was the moment I became aware of the two examples I gave. Was this where the information (senses) passing through the thalamus are interpreted and the thalamus which is continuously focusing on this information (being my conscious awareness) and thus I realise what happened?

Fairdincoomz

Thx for the pointers, when I am up to speed then I will be able to discuss this in a way scientists do. Until then wisdom would probably agree, continuing until then will only frustrate you. Thank you all for at least manning the station that is ScienceForum. From a personal perspective, the platform has at least helped me formulate my ideas to a point I think putting in the effort to learn the math etc is worth it. I have taken from this you as scientists are in complete agreement however, that my is a miss match of knowledge, piled into a precarious house of cards, and even the slightest breeze of scientific reasoning will blow it all down and reveal it a a pile of shit as you say. I am aware of this and have been from page 1. Oh, as a note, i thought of this over 20 years ago before AI, so no it is not a product of AI in case you were of that delusion .

Thank you @DrmDoc for your knowledge on this subject. I am not of this field, but have come across it before. I have in many cases been saved thankfully to my fast reactions that have kicked in without my awareness of the danger. At one point a friend while playing decided it would be clever to smash a bottle with a big stick. My attention at the time was not even in his direction however he was within the corner of my eye space. As we had been idiot adolescence we had already broken a few so it was not the sound that made me jump or any defence out of fright, but the bottom of the bottle found a direct trajectory towards my face. Not aware of this my hand, holding a stick at was by my side to a position in-front of my face and blocked said bottle shrapnel. Only then did i put the pieces togeather did I work out what happened. I wouldnt have posted had yestarday while taking my 84yr old mum to the hospital and seated in the waiting room a sign fell down with the wind. Facing almost the other direction i was not aware of it about to land on my head, but my arm was already there to stop it before this contact occurred. From this, would i be right to conclude that consciousness is not self awareness, as my senses were aware of these impending threats where I was not. Activities in my brain do occur without such self awareness but something needs to be focusing upon these processes to bring them into focus of my self conscious and my environment as i see it. And this is arguably the Thalamus?

I will agree with currently impractical, but you haven’t demonstrated the understanding of the idea, for you to say if ‘my’ idea is far worse or not.

Fair enough. I disagree that this is the case. I do see a future where humanity will be educated enough and interested enough to make well informed decisions on those areas that have global implications. Guess this future will not just be global. Ps, i am involved in some areas of politics and I know for fact we vote for people who often are clueless about the policy, clueless about the science and get voted only because they are affiliated with the right party. Your trust in this system based on what you say is naive. Lastly governing is an economic model relying on an argument based on a medieval way of managing a field. Collective management breaks down because of selfish reasons vs ownership or governance of said field is more stable. So who gets to rule Earth, as nations are the selfish people and the Earth is the field. Who is in charge?

DM is still a theoretical concept to resolve the problem of galaxy rotation, so something about it would. A stream of particles flowing onto the them from the cosmic web would help explain the dark matter halo around galaxies and clusters. As for Heavy neutrinos, I found out they are theoretical too but for different reasons, so not really likely they would. Has reminded of me of that other post. Quantum foam is basically spacetime isn’t uniform, it kinda boils and thus virtual particles pop up. That other post suggests when you cool a quantum system like a computer, at the low temperatures this boiling should become evident. Thus providing an experiment. If we were to want to look for dark matter would this be possible? So you have a quantum set up that could be disrupted by a particle with mass passing by. You now monitor the experiment so if it is disrupted by something, and you can also prove it could only have been disrupted by mass and at the moment of this occurrence no other force was present, would that point towards a passing dark matter particle?

Thanx, even though that is not part of the question, i agree, voting also would still need to be undertaken at other levels. Maybe on a neighbourhood scale if only economics and policy supported neighbourhood communities. Collective groups of neighbourhoods could then vote at the next level, and so forth from local up to global. This would keep voting relevant to only each tier of society, allowing local needs met by local people but supported by the global community.

Is it fun if all you do is swap every time…. Boring. If it is financially rewarding, you must be loaded .. nice

Meandering helps me learn Don't think Nuetrinos and dark matter are the same thing are they. If nuetrino pops up next to a black hole that is how hawking radiation works isn't it and black hole loses mass as energy removed as one of the pairs falls in and other escapes?

It was reading about how virtual particle are meant to emerge from fluctuations as matter and anti matter particles, and these are not limited to any one type, but electrons, mouns etc can emerge but they annihilate. I was interested if heavy neutrinos could too (but i think only light neutrinos can) as i wanted to know if leptogenisis could occur creating real particles, but i think this cannot. In smaller particles i think if high energy particles colliding with a pair of virtual ones they could impart enough energy to break them apart before annihilating, which in theory seems possible but they soon are destroyed in the environment of space. This made me think maybe if dark matter virtual particles were formed and could a high energy particle could cause them to split, as any resultant particles would be less likely to interact in ways to destroy them. It just seemed elegant that matter would be created in the voids and a flow of matter would stream from the void into areas of greater density such as the cosmic web. In turn energy would flow in the opposite direction thus forming a cycle like elements on Earth. It seems bits of odd information i see while learning seem to fit a slowly forming picture puzzle, but still i understand this means f all atm. But I am learning which is the most important to me. But getting back to emergent gravity I see it as a combining or wave functions, so like I pointed out in my idea gravity emerges as this is that curves space from the balance potential and hence gravity emerges. i need to find why it is only particles of mass that do this. Is mass the only attribute that can accumulate in this way?

How accepted is the framework of Emergent Gravity here? While still learning the math I do look for things that explain processes described in both relativity and QM. If I think I notice an area or something that fits my idea I try to find answers and one that keeps popping up is the study of emergent gravity that seems to fit my way of understanding. Is that up for discussion?

Regarding the book, you can’t ask a dead man’s permission, but if you believe it of great value, could you track who owns the rights now and ask them? Copyright Exceptions: You may be able to use limited excerpts under specific exceptions for non-commercial uses like private study, non-commercial research, or criticism. However, the amount you can copy must be "fair and reasonable“. if this site is about discussion and critique i think you should be able to paste what is required as long as ‘fair and reasonable’ but better check yourself. Not a lawyer of copyright law.

Hello again. Just from a dummies ignorant perspective, this theory seems to be based on lowering temperatures to reveal quantum effect. There seems to me to be a difference between quantum effects. Extreme cold reveals quantum effects in whole atoms, waves function and spin. Extreme heat reveals effects in what makes up atoms such as quarks, gluons and electrons. Would there be a prediction using raised temp in plasmas (unless this is what is testable in LHC collisions)?

I had a quick look at this. Even though you guyz know my lack of knowledge etc in this field, it seems in some ways it might agree with my view. Does this Quantum Graph theory show how the Planck scale, relativity and quantum mechanics (the universe) are emergent from the nature of spacetime as described in the theory (or hypothesis as untested yet)? Has someone beaten me to it?