MycroftWilliams

When you look at the world around you, you'll be amazed. It was the Chinese gene that took over the world fastest, and spawned fastest. (largest population in the world: China) Is that because A) the first humans had more Chinese genome in their DNA than, say, the Mexican gene, leading to evolution patterns that created a greater Chinese population than Mexican population, or B) because the Chinese gene is more evolutionary-savvy than the Mexican gene? but If A), then why did the first humans not have genes of different races in equal proportions? or If B), that it is true that some genes are more evolutionary-savvy than others, then why?

No, it isn't. It's genetics. The question is straightforward enough however; if you dissected the genome of the earliest human beings on the planet, would you find DNA of russians, chinese, britons, etc...in equal proportion?

OK, so Cain and Abel were multicoloured?

I meant like...the modern world has people of seperate genes, like African genes, Asian genes etc. Therefore the father of the human race, Adam, must have been all three 'nationalities' or 'genes'...whatever the right term is... The American gene is different than the African gene, or the Chinese gene, if you know what I mean. You are focussing on exactness of terminology. It's hardly a question of wether the right word is 'gene' or 'nationality'...for the purposes of the topic, the question is straightforward enough: were Adam and eve a coalscion of every citizenry in the world today, and did they exhibit, as a result, characteristics common to every single human being today?

Did the original human beings have the genes of every single nationality? Adam and Eve must have had genes common to French, African, Indian, Australian, Chinese people etc to have spawned the human race. On a side note, that must have made them look rather strange. Were they multicoloured, for instance? Can you imagine a human being who is equally Caucasian, African, Asian and European all in one? Adam probably had a pink nose and a yellow face. He probably had brown hands and a black chest. Does this rather curious theory make sense? or in other words... IF, and only if, in BC ad infinitum... THEN, in 2022...