altaylar2000

Predator must be killed by a hero

Everyone knows that. The dollar did not change for gold, only during government calculations, as soon as De Gaulle took out 2 ships of gold from the United States, the United States declared a default

Must be killed too

It doesn't matter, under the gold standard there was no real gold plating, even officially there was a fractional reserve of 1 in 10 or so, and there wasn’t even that. It was just a formality

All this is nonsense, practically the same yuan coverage system works there asit was in the Bretton Woods system, only without golden promises and more flexible. To fill its budget, China is forced to export goods to the US and Europe, otherwise it will not print the yuan and collect taxes for the budget. Their can not print own money, only exchange on western actives This was standard system of British Empire, currency board yes, they hold another debts too, but it change nothing principially

Killing a predator simply because it is killer of innocents

Indra kills a snake, a villain and a liar and frees cows and waters, the sources of life for peaceful people, for this he is praised, and not for the fact that he attacked the innocent

I don't care about the empty stomach of the wolf. I'll just kill him as it should be Regardless of whether he is well-fed or hungry, for evil must be destroyed In traditional Aryan morality, the hero is not the one who attacks the weak, but who destroys the attacker. Anything else is absurd. Nietzsche's morality is foolishness for idiots attacking a weak or by group to this day is generally considered a shame and weakness, and not a sign of strength or nobility

This was alredy discussed

Often they kill them and this is right. About what rights have the predator you can tell your mother or child, when they are attacked by a robber, rapist or cannibal, and there is no antipredator nearby, who will prevent the predator's crime

Yes, I have If there is a problem somewhere, then it is definitely not in this question. There is no use in stupid pacifism, he plays into the hands of wolves in sheep's clothing

since you did not voice the problem, there is nothing to talk about

I don't undestand what a problem

Mainly modern OOP became more static, and more synchronous I think A very difficult compromise with compiler vendors.

This is bad example because they evil-tolerance. They not kill evil, just tolerate As for "killing" bacteria, this is demagoguery, bacteria are no more sensitive than plants.

There is a relationship. First ideas for OOP comes directly from frames Minsky and Hewitt's Actors Before them noone used "object" like unit of computation with own memory and behavor, it's the base idea of OOP too

China puting almost all profit in US Government, Is It easier? What the question? Why they still feed the Chinese with rice?

Just don't ask about the color of my underwear. This is not an excuse, you can die from the cold, and there is no need to seek out extremes. Most people eat meat not even out of hunger, but for pleasure.

May be it's my problem with english, But there is In general, there are objective properties, this cannot be simply "decide"

Yes, the problem is "autistic" formal interpretation of informal text

The language is not perfect, I mean profit without taking into account the costs of production and life support

There is no difficulty for me. Predators and parasites(in animal world) are not conscious villains, but this is not a reason to equate them with the innocent. There is no such possibility to differentiate precisely conscious villainy, because anyone can be justified in this way, say the rapist is innocent, because nature created him that way. This is idle chatter

_____ It's kind of obvious that it's impossible not to invest in own economy at all, then everyone will die of hunger.

Are you trying to find solace in the word "completely"? Let not completely LOL They know better how to do it most effectively.

then I don't know its price either