requirer

And why?

The question is contained in the title text, though i'm not sure if this is the appropriate place (forum) to ask the question. Thanks

I'm a purist, but honestly you've got a point

From the sense of duty, I'll also give this: https://www.alliesofhumanity.org/ React as you will

Once you cross a certain threshold there's no more thinking within the evidence spectrum, you observe the creative principle and that this principle can be used for both good and bad things. Whether you will call this a mental, psychological or spiritual thing depends on your own discernment. Until then you will be receiving outside information that will not live up to a standardized organization of assessment forever. Frauds, manipulations, lies, promises, it's all within this scope of life many still consider a "game". It's a force, it's influencing us, weary or not. Masses are not easy to keep awake, especially when they do not want to take care even for themselves appropriately. Fear isn't generally agreed upon to be a weak spot for mind control. You don't hear this observation from the "global information system" where "experts" get to think instead of those who still give their authority over to questionable personnel. And from here on you will probably have doubt. Morality certainly isn't their priority. And there are countless sources of information which are accessible even now, all it takes is interest, openness to a different point of view. That does not mean you have to take everything for granted. I am not even sure with myself what is ok and what is not, it's a chaotic world and experiences are so individualized that the strongest way of communication becomes that which imposes upon you. Hardly anyone questions where did the unintuitive mess we're living come from

It can be seen as such. But I did not mean individual focus. Humanity is falling apart in numerous ways even with all the understanding and advancement we have accomplished. COVID is one such problem. A responsible civilization does not allow such "accidents" to be. Just no, thank you. To be clear here, I did not intend to dismiss human understanding as redundant or inferior in any way, I only wanted to state that in my opinion mainstream science has a very unripe approach towards life and it doesn't really serve the wellbeing of the whole. Not that all scientists are anti-humans and against natural principles. It's that the abusers have the upper hand in what we think as an "intellectual civilization" in which we live. As long as we will tend to go against everything thanks to our arrogance and delusions of supremacy, we will have problems that do not at all go along with what we imagine ourselves to be.

Anti-nature was the product of my incapability to cope with life. Not that I have impediments in basic tasks of life, but the very essence of life, our inexplicable instinctive curiosity, our bitter primitivity, our bias towards materialism and our utter aimlessness and lack of complete focus, all show lack of self-esteem. Always fitting life into our own understanding, as if the universe is governed by human understanding! As if life wouldn't be possible was it not for our "science"... Yes, you're making abstract concepts and cannot even discern them from your own tendencies and nature. You're identifying yourself with your notions and preferences under the guise of science. Do away with science and life is still there. Life doesn't need science or technology to have its natural way. And where did this come up? I could not accept the general "control-oriented" consensus. If you are both interested for something more, have this https://www.martinus.dk/en/frontpage/index.html

No, not that it can fall under the category of rigorous, testable methods by which it could be verified. It is not a "five sense" thing. And I understand that my claims are bordering traditional reasoning, and I will have to stop my futile attempts for that reason "Meditation's impact on the brain": https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r3neFV38TJQ

I'll just end with this, I tried to die without action, didn't work, was frustrated. Pain doesn't go away. I will also leave this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M%C3%BCnchhausen_trilemma

It seems that we have a different perception of reality and that this debate won't lead anywhere. In my understanding of your terminology, "I lose"

I like to think that their consciousness (electromagnetic structure) left to where it is most appropriate, depending on the state of consciousness when they left the physical plane How do you think science would be born were it not for those who all had to start with personal suppositions, tackling the problems relevant to their times, rather than sticking to those beliefs and methodologies of the old? Are you stating that breakthroughs, independent, critical thinking are not allowed in science? Well, religious adherence to a fixed body of knowledge at the cost of the all-inclusive phenomenon of nature and all its unpredictable aspects and creative potential, that doesn't sound like science to me

"Something" is anything you direct your attention to. All from colorful ideas, notions, abstract thoughts, emotions, experiences, actions and down to passive absorption, a clear mind, listening, sleeping. All expressions of interaction. "Something that has ceased to exist" still exists in the memory, rendering it observable through the desire to express it in the desired medium

I do not quite understand this rhetoric, however knowledge of these constructs only gives further evidence that it is none other than life behind these. These "entities" could not exist whatsoever without being compared to that which is NOT a "living dodo" or a "dinosaur", thereby pointing out that contrast, or that which changes, is a basic constituent of life. Death is the lack of movement, change, contrast, and I fail to observe this phenomenon in daily life. Anti-nature is in my own personal definition the inertia to change Can you prove this?

Can something cease to "exist" or is everything only transformation of matter? Since this is life, including this post, is it possible to go against life and "die"? Occult teachings only provide an explanation of life, and material science only observes external phenomenon, therefore interprets, while consciousness and thought are life by their own right, so where is death?