Jump to content

Samantha Priss

  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

-8 Poor

About Samantha Priss

  • Rank

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Your rules are fake. You claim to oppose "prejudice" and "bigotry". And then enforce racial-Marxism under those terms, which don't apply.
  2. Well the entire postmodern (anti-white Communist) academic establishment seems to constantly want to bring up "white people are to blame for black failure" as a topic, and play it 24/7 on their bought media. So it's hardly surprising people react to that.
  3. Nonsense. The threads I saw had nothing to do with "prejudice". They were trying to establish group differences. Ironically it's evidence free equality ideas that are "prejudice" and "bigotry". Those words have meanings, they don't mean "departure from racial Marxism". They mean believing things without evidence. The hilarious part is that if you honestly applied your rules you would need to ban yourselves.
  4. Where in the rules does it say "departure from strict racial-Marxism in human biology will be labelled "bigotry" and discussion closed"? I noticed the scientific refutation was absent, so I can understand why name-calling has to be used as a "reason". But let's not pretend there's any science about that.
  5. I notice any threads about how races are not exactly equal get closed by swansont for spurious reasons like "bigotry".
  6. There's a difference between treating people kindly and treating them equally. Sure, I think Franz Boas had connections to the Soviets didn't he? He's really at the root of modern academic racial-Marxism.
  7. I can think of Western media and academia pushing equality ideas, yes. You didn't notice? After the failure of economic Marxism in the West they switched to cultural and racial Marxism, which seems to have successfully eroded the West. I guess we're in the "erasure" stage if Bezmenov had such a thing. “”It takes from fifteen to twenty years to demoralize a nation. Why that many years? Because this is the minimum number of years which requires to educate one generation of students in the country of your enemy exposed to the ideology of the enemy. In other words Marxist-Leninism id
  8. Sure but the point is the task that these recruits are doing. Usually one thinks of spying as stealing secrets. These recruits are in media and academia and are recruited to push Marxist propaganda.
  9. Yuri Bezmenov was a KGB agent who defected to Canada in the 70s. In the 80s he gave a series of talks and lectures on KGB intelligence methods. Notably he claimed that most work was not secret gathering, but developing people in Western countries who could unwittingly assist in a subversion program. These were usually people in higher education, the intention was to train the next generation in ideas that would bring about "demoralisation" of the West, so that further influence and control could be leveraged. How credible is the theory that a Soviet style conspiracy has gripped Western academi
  10. They could probably grow all of the other parts. The only thing not predictable from DNA is the brain state.
  11. I guess the only problem is whether the state of the brain's neurons can be recovered.
  12. I find it hard to support borders and laws when I see a crying brown child ten thousand miles away on my TV.
  13. That isn't power that's energy. Tsar Bomba released all of its energy in a fraction of a second. https://www.quora.com/What-is-the-difference-between-power-and-energy I think an analogy here is using high explosives to push a bullet. What would happen is it would just wreck your equipment achieving nothing.
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.