Jump to content

Roger Dynamic Motion

Senior Members
  • Posts

    318
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Roger Dynamic Motion

  1. 1 minute ago, swansont said:

    There are multiple experiments (which is why the plural, photons, was used) where a single photon is present. How can that be, if you need a wave to create a path?

    to the best of my understanding the wave comes from the expansion of the source the tungsten compressing space creating its own gravitational field   the same way the presence of the Earth has created it own gravitational field witch is inversely proportional to its sises (diameter )

  2. 16 minutes ago, Strange said:

    Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.

    Do you have any evidence at all?

     

    3 minutes ago, swansont said:

    My point was that photons do not travel a sinusoidal path. The transverse axes is the graphs are amplitudes of the fields. The E and B fields get stronger and weaker at regular intervals. There is no transverse path.

    One problem with "light is a wave connecting photons" is how do you account for single photons? 

     is how do you account for single photons?  Clarified please.   photons or photon

     
  3. On 10/4/2017 at 6:27 AM, swansont said:

    I assumed "traversal" means transverse. I've observed it's a common misconception that photons travel a sinusoidal path.

    yes i agree   and i want to point out  that photons are every where in space  and they are not propagated from the source of light  because light it self is only a Wave , connecting photons along the path formed by the wave    and regarding the transverse path that can be explain from the fact that  there is no rest in space  and in fact the Earth is spinning no wave can be stable during its propagation from photon to photon that why photons have  a Sinusoidal disturbance  this is the best i can explain quickly,now 

    16 minutes ago, Roger Dynamic Motion said:

    yes i agree   and i want to point out  that photons are every where in space  and they are not propagated from the source of light  because light it self is only a Wave , connecting photons along the path formed by the wave    and regarding the transverse path that can be explain from the fact that  there is no rest in space  and in fact the Earth is spinning no wave can be stable during its propagation from photon to photon that why photons have  a Sinusoidal disturbance  this is the best i can explain quickly,now 

    got to go   later 

     

  4. Yes . According to my observation from a working model; it is only possible under one condition  ,,,and that is < the opposite force must generate it's own acceleration; witch leads to + 2 minus negative 1 = one half of the total force generated by the systeme ,,and further more  +2+3+4+5~minus negative 1 to infinity is possible, but not practical.

    the answers to questions from you all  might be difficult  for any one to comprehend. sorry about that .

  5. Talking about entangled particles,,let say 2 superposed photons on the z axis one at the base and the other at the top and they both have  information  the distance of separation  on the z axis is (zero  time) infinite and constant..so to send out information on the x or y axis  perpendicular  to the data from the z axis any where  along the z axis is the worm hole that make it possible 

  6. 57 minutes ago, Strange said:

    Why do you think photons have a displacement back and forth?

    It because the source is in motion ( spin)  like a radar doing a  scrutiny in  space  ,,,and each photons tend to restore the straight path of the beam. (to note ,,that the first photon erected remains stable with the source . (no  back and forth )

    And I'd like to point out  if photons add a rest mass light would not be possible  ,,,and by the way the spin of the protons are  parallel to the GF.

    and also ~ the first photon always has a negative one  superposed .

  7. Just now, Strange said:

    I still have no idea what the question is.

    "What makes you think you understand more than others about an incomplete theory?"

    It doesn't really make much sense as a general question. It depends on ones level of expertise and understanding of the theory. (All theories are incomplete.)

    look up the theory of light

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.