# Roger Dynamic Motion

Senior Members

318

## Posts posted by Roger Dynamic Motion

### now and after

And event can be created  , negatively 1, and responded at positively 2 ~so time is not the same witch lead to continuous medium.= expansion

### now and after

And event can be created  , negatively 1, and responded at positively 2 ~so time is not the same witch lead to continuous medium.= expansion

### So called "Dark Energy" and Gravity.

Perhaps its what you claim as "my logic" that needs to be examined:

Logic is not a  point of argument here. nor an assessment for the true   ; when a theory in completed than it become logical and dependable.

### So called "Dark Energy" and Gravity.

Strange~

You did not explained your gravity.

So ! What is that  ''fictitious  force'' from your perspective from the Big Bang , that would keep my two feet on the ground ?

### So called "Dark Energy" and Gravity.

53 minutes ago, Strange said:

We have a theory of gravity that matches, very accurately, what we observe. It doesn't include either pull or push. It is also the basis the Big Bang model.

We have a theory of gravity  , doesn't include either pull or push.

__________________________________________________________________

So ! What is that  ''fictitious  force'' from your perspective from the Big Bang , that would keep my two feet on the ground ?

A theory that do not match  my logic, is nonsense to me ; I prefer to live with reality on Earth ,with my to feet on the ground, push by a force that I call ''Gravity''

### So called "Dark Energy" and Gravity.

Well ! Look at it this way . No pull nor push = no gravity ; if the theory of the big gang make sens ,, than the push make sens too  sins the vector produced  is out where = push:

### What is Space made of?

Volume is defined by whatever occupies it. Whatever occupies it defines the boundary.

Volume, cant be empty space !/ can it ?

### What is Space made of?

Simply put you cannot have a field if you have no volume. Or technically volume or area for 2d fields

But..Volume require boundary. So what is boundary ? is it a time limit?... containing Energy ? and if so matter must be a part of it .

### What is Space made of?

This is how I think. The existence of space - which is just volume - is dependent on the existence of fields. On that line of thinking, empty spaces full of nothing (?) can''t exist.

To me, when I hear or read the word nothing ; i cannot think other of an other particle that i have called Nothing..and it's a ''Cube''. The reason Why? is that ,when in my head i shrink the 8 corners back to the center of the cube i do not see the Cube any more So! what if empty space, we so call, was replaced by cubes that cannot be detected and nor seen .

### Imagination is more important than knowledge

I would welcome an explanation.

Well < your're the one who analysed it; and judged ''nonsense'' it is for you to explain; Why?

### Imagination is more important than knowledge

You may, try, disguise your intention with an apparently germane argument; but we both know why you posted this nonsense.

''

< After reading the post from handy''; I would most agree wit much of it !

### Imagination is more important than knowledge

Basically: The imagination is the fallow up of an idea ; from within the desire ,from a vision ,to want to know more about a subject matter , that is sheared with your conscientiousness

### What is Space made of?

So far, space has no it been found to be quantised; It's smooth AFAIK. It's just volume with things in it.

|If one uses! it's imagination and + it's hallucination perhaps logic will relieved what? makes the best of it's understandding.

### build a machine without an outside force

Through out those years ?

I have been conceptualized models with the law of physic; and I have gained the knowledge perhaps? not = to the superior one; but ! can any one challenge my knowledge; << Without regression .

### Killing Animals and Spirituality?

Do you think someone can be spiritual even if they pay someone to kill an animal so they can eat meat?

What if that person is a millionaire or billionaire and donating to charities all over the world yet still support the suffering of people, animals, and the environment by eating meat? Let's say that a rich person donates to charities that help with climate change and world hunger.

Is this person using his/her money to relieve the symptoms but not necessarily getting to the root of the problem? What do you all think?

well one can eat grass ? what do you like ?

### What is Space made of?

If space is just volume, how do reconcile 'quantum foam' or are you intending to make a clear distinction between what GR says and QP says?

Space is made out of of a particle that is call noting because we cannot see it and cannot detected and will become something = matter

throughout presses of matter and that involving fusing action (not reaction )= fission

### In the angular momentum equation, L = r x p, when the magnitude of the radius changes, which one of the remaining variables is correctly conserved ?

If r = zero, angular momentum = zero.

No! <angular momentum is conserved ,leading to minus 1 (one),,, to infinite.

### Imagination is more important than knowledge

That doesn't make sense, knowledge is added constantly; out of the three, only understanding is in the past.

Basically: The imagination must be the fallow up of an idea << Imagination is within the desire to want to know more about a subject matter , that is sheared with your conscientiousness.

### Understanding Reality

Perhaps you should carry on anyway. Further explanation might clarify any confusion about your initial assertions.

It is very clear that representations and the thing represented are different. And that the relationship is arbitrary.

I am not sure that is true. But that is another (huge) area of philosophical debate that would probably just be a distraction.

Given the ill-defined, vague and changing nature of each of the $x_i$ terms in your equation, it is not clear that this is a useful exercise. I can't currently see that it does anything more than translating the original sentence into another natural language would. Hopefully, your further explanations will clarify this point.

You also seem to be ignoring grammar. You appear to be only considering the meanings (representations) of the symbols, not their relationship to one another.

For example, there is a big difference between "man bites dog" and "dog bites man" and "dog bit man".

And even more so between "let's eat, Grandma" and "let's eat Grandma".

How does your mathematical representation handle these?

There are other complexities such as context, the relationship between the speaker and the listener, where the utterance is made, etc.

And then there are the issues of the implied meaning versus the literal meaning. For example, if someone gives you a cup of coffee and you say, "Do you have any sugar?" then you are probably not asking about whether they are in possession of sucrose or not. You are (politely) requesting that they give you some.

(Or, more topically, if your boss says, "I hope you will drop this inquiry" then that is not just a vague hope, it is a pretty direct order.)

No more so than the fact that any language can be translated into any other.

But there are difficulties in converting spoken language to a written form. For example, these forms do not easily convey tone of voice, facial expressions, body language, etc. This is why some jokes fail to work, or are seriously misunderstood, on the Internet. You can also lose the ability to make jokes involving homophones that are spelled differently.

These problems seem to apply equally to your proposed mathematical representation. (Which is why, despite the idea being centuries old, no one has achieved it.)

I look forward to hearing more of your thought. I haven't yet seen anything that justifies your rather grandiose claims.

(I should say, in case you are not familiar with his work, that this is from a physicist.)

Strange _Hope, is not an Order in this quote,

if your boss says, "I hope you will drop this inquiry" then that is not just a vague hope, it is a pretty direct order.)

< take it as ; creating a vision of the suject matter , a suggestion, perhaps ? it is better to forget about the issue.

That is Reality .

### Understanding Reality

How can lanquage not be a representation? Every single word in any lanquage represents a meaning. Including mathematics.

How can you possibly have a lanquage that isn't representative?

Of course understanding reality must include lanquage usage. There is no option to convey discoveries etc without some form of lanquage. It is unavoidable. Mathematics is simply a more exacting lanquage but a lanquage nonetheless.

Yes lanquage terminology has limits in describing reality but there is no better option. At some point one must convey to another a descriptive of a dynamic etc.

I didn't post examples to discuss circumstances but to convey that at some point interpretation and representation would be required ie the examples I posted.

(Sorry wrong person.)

Strange _Hope, is not an Order in this quote, meaning to stop it.

if your boss says, "I hope you will drop this inquiry" then that is not just a vague hope, it is a pretty direct order.) < take it as ; creating a vision of a suggestion, perhaps ? it is better to forget about the issue.

That is Reality .

### Imagination is more important than knowledge

Pure imagination without the anchor of knowledge is just vapour.

you've got that right ! String

### Imagination is more important than knowledge

OK - what did you mean?

One investigates is knowledge thought (imagination) ; This implies, to use your imagination to verified the veracity of the structure of your though about something .

< then fallow experimentation to incise is Knowledge :

### Imagination is more important than knowledge

Well, that is the point - my quotation from you makes no grammatical sense whatsoever. The burden is on you to explain what you meant.

Well,you should have asked me ; what do you mean ?

### Imagination is more important than knowledge

You could shuffle these words into any order and make more sense than as it stands.

### In the angular momentum equation, L = r x p, when the magnitude of the radius changes, which one of the remaining variables is correctly conserved ?

It depends on the system.

Are you saying that relative motion is not a fact in the case of (Closed system) .
×