Jump to content

zztop

Senior Members
  • Posts

    179
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by zztop

  1. The "moving element" is the light emitting ions. (the wiki article is terrible)
  2. There is no Doppler effect in Michelson-Morley. The source of light and the receiver move as one single body, so , there is no relative motion between them. Hence, no Doppler.
  3. The author of the paper (the owner of the Mrelativity website) is a well known crackpot, you can ignore what he's saying. The IS experiment is brilliantly simple: -the ions emit light DIRECTLY towards the receiver with frequency [latex]f_s[/latex] -the light arrives redshifted at the receiver: [latex]f_s=\gamma f_r (1-\frac{v}{c} cos \alpha_r)[/latex] -the ions also emit light AWAY from the receiver, towards a mirror located at the opposite end from the receiver in the cathode tube that emitted the ions in the first place -the light is reflected by the mirror and arrives at the receiver blueshifted: [latex]f_s=\gamma f_b (1-\frac{v}{c} cos \alpha_b)=\gamma f_b (1+\frac{v}{c} cos \alpha_r)[/latex] because [latex]\alpha_b=\pi-\alpha_r[/latex] (the beams are anti-parallel) The experimenters measure [latex]f_r, f_b[/latex]. From the measurements, they determine the transverse Doppler effect as the part of the shift that is direction independent, by simply taking the average of the two measured frequencies: [latex]\frac{f_r+f_b}{2}=\frac{f_s}{\gamma} [/latex] It is a brilliant experiment. The person suggesting it was........Einstein. 51 years later (!), there was a DIRECT test of transverse Doppler effect: Hasselkamp et al., Z. Physik A289 (1989), pg 151.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.