Jump to content

farolero

Senior Members
  • Posts

    61
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by farolero

  1. probably youve heard about this before if not here it is:

     

     

    classical logic breaks with this problem but what if we use quantum many worlds logic

     

    first i assume that the judge told the truth and the hanging will be uncertain

     

    and what does uncertain mean?

     

    i think it means that you dont know what world of the 5 posible you live in NOW, if you live in a death by monday world a death by tuesday world or so on

     

    so if you get by friday and you havent died you know for sure youre on a death by friday world and in the rest of them you just dont exist any more so you know theres now a single world left and you have certainty of which one it is

     

    so theres certainty of the world you live in and the judge has lied

     

    but lets suppose thurday came and you havent died

     

    now you can inhabit two posible worlds, death by thursday or death by friday in the rest the observer doesnt exist any more

     

    and as you can not be certain the world you live in is posible you die any time and the judge would have not lied, it depends in which of the two left worlds youre NOW

     

    but the elimination procces cant be extended any more as classically you would, as long as youre inhabiting two superimposed worlds you can not know in which one youre now

     

    so i think uncertainty can be defined as you can not be certain of which of the many worlds you live in but you know everythings posible

  2. well i guess this rightly belongs in speculations for its my personal interpretation of the wave function collapse

     

    i really appreciate you still allow discussion on it under your norms

     

    how does it being stoned make wrong, which btw youre confusing madness with being stoned, my state is natural i need no drugs for it

     

    your point is a fallacy call ad homine

     

    your crazy hence youre wrong and you should shut up

     

    if i search the number in base 27 hello in square root of two it will be somewhere and being sqaure root of two irrationally infinite i can search for as big number as i want, a number even as big as a midnight summer dream

     

    it should be there somewhere

     

    this is a paralelism with the wave function where all posibilities exist

     

    my point is that the reader of square root of two(the observer of the world) as everybody else has the free will to delete the parts he doesnt like

     

    again a man makes his own luck, concretely a man subcouncious

  3. in the other thread we are discussing what collapses the wave function in the double slit experiment

     

    ive been told that its collapsed by the measure instrument

     

    i agree with this but a measure instrument has an implicit observation of the measurement results

     

    how could you know the wave function has been collapsed if you dont observe the results, maybe it hasnt and you dont know you can not know for sure

     

    so if we take its the observer ultimately whom collapses the wave function seems to have been a choice of left or right slit

     

    but this is a problem to explain common reality, what if there are two observers and one collapses wave function so the photon goes through left slit and the other collapses it going trhough right

     

    this is not problem if the choice is negative you dont chose what slit goes through you chose what slit does not go through

     

    so the choices of the observer in the double slit experiment are:

     

    it does not go through left slit it does not go through right slit it does not go through neither slit

     

    then there would be not problem to explain consensual reality as each single person choice

     

    in square root of two decimals in base 27 are contained in the vein of the eternal typing monkeys all books stories and variations of them like borges explains in his babel library where all posible books are contained

     

    maybe your familiar with the forum stories where each poster posts a sentence and a story appears

     

    well in the case of sqaure root of two as a paralelism with the many worlds each observer would edit out sentences of the book square root of two

     

    the deleting allowance is infinite for sqaure root of two is infinite

     

    the story thats left after huge and eternal editions would be a story that tells exactly this consensual reality we live in

     

    of course the editions are made by the subcouncious

     

    so free will would be the most powerfull force of the universe with the power to destroy a whole universe and karma would be the subcouncious will we have for ourselves with no better judge than the self

     

    a man choses his own luck

  4. heres a videopost on experiments im conducting on randomness and the observer :)

     


    i have an opinion on how the observer affects the randomness of the double slit experiment:

     

    what does the photon make go through left or right slit?

     

    the observer choses the slit

     

    what happens if there are two observers and one choses left and the other right

     

    the observer doesnt chose what slit exists but which slit dont exist

    if one observer choses left slit and the other right not to exist none exist but in a thrid wolrd maybe left slit will have more appeal to both observers so that will exist

     

    this means weve been blaming alll the times others for what is our ultimate responsability

     

    each and each single person is ultimately responsible for everything that goes on on the world, maybe the ostricht is quantum


    edit:

     

    http://noosphere.princeton.edu/

  5. i came across this:

     

    https://quantumexperience.ng.bluemix.net/qstage/#/community/question?questionId=1afebf8a829741e6a69cb1a31fa3083b

     

     

    i dont know if thermal noise would involve a quantum effect but if it doesnt is not trully random cause it will be the same in all worlds given same initial conditions

     

     

    i think you confuse trully random with trully hard to break

  6. you may consider my consideration nonsense but you wouldnt even try, your imagination has been killed by this society

     

    but the guys at ibm just gave me unlimited acces to theyr computer:

     

    so far i did 4 google accounts to test the true random number generator and for every account i just could use it 3 times

     

    but in the four time i filled the questionary and put titel to my experiments:

     

    lightning a light for every 0.1% edge

     

    clapping hands 3 times for every 0.1% edge

     

    clapping hands 2 times for every 0.1% edge

     

    so far i tested a 5,2% edge on 8194 iterations bly clapping hands two times

     

    incidentally i wonder if starnge could be right and a computer based on the pc clock could be random since a human has a quamtum computer brain and hence the instant of the clock will be trully random

     

    so i got a no deposit bonus at a online casino and now i clap hands every time i win at slots

     

    synchronical the girl in the slot animation claps hands for every win :)

     

    if you delete this youre supressing scientific evidence that anyone can try at this stage of humanity

  7. im exposings facts i did not claim anything but factual results if you want you can test yourself i can pm the breath technique

     

    i develop it myself to find out it has oriental origin related to chi force

     

    i named it the atheist nightmare caus eit gets you stoned drug free naturally, also it stops your heart 5 or ten seconds from there the high, your body thinks he is gonna die and chills you down for that moment

  8. sorry but im not here to argue

     

    i just did the experiment here the results:

     

    first i said to myself ill run 4096 superpositions of 1 and zero and for every one hundred superpositions in whcih zero turns out ill stop my heart with the breathing technique one time

     

    the zero appeared with a 2.8% edge which meant 21 breaths

     

    next i said to myself well for every edge of the zero of 0.1% ill stop my heart one time

     

    in 8192 superposed worlds zero appear with a 4.2% edge :)

     

    that was meant getting euphoric breathing 42 times

     

    think the edge with a single deck blackjack game is 0.3% so if im right i can get rich just breathing

     

    shame i run of credits to run that computer

  9. im doing an interesting experiment with that true random number generator the problem is that i have litle acces to that computer

     

    while trying to give up smoking i find about a dnagerous oriental breathing technique that gets you high and euphoric

     

    i found out doing this breathing technique my heart would stop for five or ten seconds while everything begins to get dark though eventually it goes back to noraml

     

    so what im doing now is do this breathing technique to stop my heart depending if the outcome is a zero or one

     

    so far ive found a 15% edge on 1024 superpositions

     

    tonight ill try to see 4096

  10. not even the intel chips dare to call themselves true random cause theyre not

     

    a hand coin toss is unpredictable a quantum coin toss is trully random

     

    in a hand coin toss in all wordls theres the same outcome given the same factors

     

    in a quantum coin toss given the same initial factors in every world theres a different outcome

     

    hell even you can reproduce now shroedinger thought experiment with that quantum computer and an egg

     

    but of course you wont do this experiment nor thank me for my link cause you dont like physics its just your job and youre not here to learn youre here to argue

     

    i can grant you myself as soon i as i have eggs ill test

  11. youre confusing randomness with unpredictability and theyre not the same thing:

     

    the statistical analisis of random org could be applied to a coin toss and i think we can agree a coin toss is not random but too complex to be predicted but if you knew all factors with detail you could predict the outcome

     

    its the same for intel chips, theyre too complex to be predicted but not true random in order to avoid hacking

     

    those random number generators are just as random as the decimals of square root of two

     

    apparently random if you dont know the key but not quite

  12. thanks for the link, i was aware of that site but thats not trully random but just to difficult to predict as a coint toss which is neither random

     

    with that quantum computer you could for example check princeton studies on how global events like 911 or lady di death affected chance on TRUE quantum random number generators

     

    for example you could do this experiment there you couldnt do with your site

     

    you generate a true random number and if it turns one you kill an egg :)

     

    who knows maybe the universe abhorres a meaningless destruction of abeing

  13. yeah i meant superposition

     

    i know fiction art is not science but the man in the high castle is relevant cause its about the many worlds

     

     

    they use a heisemberg device there to travel among the different worlds

     

    for example a woman dies but next reappears being from another dimention whee she didnt die

  14.  

    on the label on that bottle on the tray and if the pictures went on forever, with smaller and smaller pictures of the coffee bottle.

     

    thanks for the heads up:

     

    im not allowed to post it here the image i did but you can render infinity in your screen with a webcam in less than 20 secs:

     

    connect the webcam and show output on your screen

     

    aim webcam to screen output

     

    play with infinity

     

    would this be a strange loop?

     

    edit:

     

    btw what you describe about that coffe causes me a strange feeling of being familiar with that brand and dejavu

  15. yes exactly being death means no observation unless you believe in afterlife and keep observing as a ghost

     

    but could the universes be in overposition and pop in and out of existence?

     

    in the man in the high castle tv series which is about the many worlds in the last moment of the last chapter of the first row of chapters theres a change of reality

     

    they live in a nazi dominant world to instantly change to an ally dominant one

     

    the thing is that nobody notices but the japanese high ranking diplomat

     

    so we would be blind to these changes of reality while the japanese guy saw them perfectly

     

    so the japanese guy could experience death bot not a person blind to this changes

     

    so is it posible the universes pop in and out of existence and we dont notice?

     

    do i live in the same world i was living two minutes ago?

  16. i know this is dificult to grasp but the observer can only observe if he is alive

     

    any observation which includes a death of the observer scenario doesnt exist

     

    edit:

     

    the observer can only observe if he is alive

     

    hence the only posible observation for the observer is being alive

     

    in the many worlds the posibilñity of being alive always exist

     

    ergo the observer will always observe himself alive

     

    (which btw doesnt mean will age for a trillion years i think we change our age all the time and dont even notice)

  17. more art dealing with infinity and transfinity :)

     

    385_zpsg73nxm6s.jpg

    dada_zpsr9zsxjvi.jpg

    Imagen0539_zpsfaa7vetg.jpg

     

     

    crco_zpskw0wzory.jpg

    and one not mine :)

     

    main_buzz_larger.jpg

     

    curiosuly enough what i express here can not be expressed neither with numbers in base 10 nor with numbers in base 26, letters

     

    thats why i hope someone can point me to works on transfinity that re gemoetrical not numberical(from numb, cloud)


    4345ff498abf688bf1ff0bf67f91b1f3.jpg


    here dealing with transfinity geometrically, you cant handle this with numb ers

     

    IMG_20170113_160444_zpshhw0dqzc.jpg

     

     

  18. but if the many worlds interpretation is right it has dramatic consecuences:

     

    for example we can not be sure if earths atmosphere can be iginited just by a small fire

     

    we just have the practical experience it doesnt but how valid is this in the many worlds?

     

    lets suppose the chance a small light turns earth into an small sun is 99,999999999999%

     

    in all those worlds that earth burnt we died and have no perception we just can have the perception it doesnt because its the only case the observer has perception

     

    for example if this was true the worst thing you could do would be getting close to a safe enough nuclear refuge

     

    if the chance with trump now of global destruction is 99.9999999% we just can have a perception while alive if the world gets obliterated we get no perception

     

    but if you get close to a refuge chances would change now you have a high chance to remain alive thorugh wwiii

     

    so the perception would be that as soon as you get close to a nuclear refuge the nukes will go off

     

    but does this mean eventually well get to be a million years old?

     

    now we are immortal and we dont notice now we are 40 but in 2 seconds will be 80 and in 4 seconds 12 and in six maybe 40 again and like that forever

     

    its like what will the future bring in thousands of years

     

    in the many wolrds at least one earth will survive

     

    how will they acquire technological immortalilty i see two main options:

     

    clonation and ego loading and memory transfer

     

    or for example setting explosive charges in new borns set in such a away that whe a single person from this world dies everybody dies so your perception would be nobody you love dies ever and neither do you

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.