ModernArtist25

So according Peta, FDA reported 92 out of every 100 drugs that successfully pass animal trials, failed in humans. If this is true, why are we then keep using animals for testing? here's the link: http://www.peta.org/issues/animals-used-for-experimentation/us-government-animal-testing-programs/food-drug-administration/ good news is as technology advances, human chips will eventually be used instead of animals in the future: http://wyss.harvard.edu/viewpage/484/

Well i sure cant see oxygen though what we breath, it is colorless Do you mean we "see" them because we know that they exist? For example, if I believe in demons and angels, I will "see" them too...

Ooh i see, but only with a super microscope lol

Can elements like oxygen, hydrogen, nitrogen, etc. that make up the human body can be seen?

so if 65% of the human body is made of oxygen (according to wiki), does this mean that if humans die, oxygen is dispersed in the air and we all breath dead people?

Ok so forests(trees) provide us oxygen to breath. But so does bacteria. If all trees are destroyed, would it still be possible for us to live because there would still be bacteria everywhere?? why or why not?

This one too: http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2015/10/homosexuality-may-be-caused-chemical-modifications-dna

Says here, there are some genetic markers that can determine if someone is gay with 70 percent accuracy: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-3265248/Homosexuality-imprinted-genes-Scientists-predict-gay-70-cent-accuracy.html

In terms of evolution, aren't humans meant to be straight so they can reproduce and that is why we still exist today?

What's your opinion on this? And why do you feel that way? Provide facts if you can

Do most farmers make their own fuel?

Please feel free to speak politically, would love to hear your opinion

Larger population of humans mean more food needed, and that means more factory farming. Factory farming contributes to global warming: http://www.ecowatch.com/how-factory-farming-contributes-to-global-warming-1881690535.html

I believe in China, they fine people who breaks the child policy

So you think if Vegans don't exist at all, it won't have any affect on the global warming or environment as a whole?

You think it's better than education? why so?

I have to admit, I'm too selfish to let go of meat. But by nature, human beings are selfish, altruism does not exist. Everything we do is either for personal gratification or to protect our ego(we avoid feeling guilty or shame when we can) But I try to eat less meat and support free-range meat anyway I can, that's the best I can do

Good info!

so educating people is the way to go? How will education be accessible in all countries?

if there is education for all but overpopulation is still continuing, will that still help?

and will this vitro cause more environmental issues? I don't see anything wrong with sheeps and goats eating grass, but when we start to take away the animal's freedom and have them live in a lonely dirty confined environment to benefit us humans, that's when the issue comes in

Wars? Like nuclear war for resources?

hmm...that's actually a pretty good idea, just having the meat as a treat to be savored. The traditional Okinawans actually only ate meat during big festivals and most of their diet consisted of sweet potatoes.And they lived a long lifespan

Well as you all know overpopulation is harming our planet, causing global warming, habitat loss, consumption of resources, etc. Is there a way to remedy this? Will limiting the number of babies a couple can have in all countries be a solution?

If majority of people on Earth is a vegan, do you all think it will help with saving the environment? why or why not? To me, more vegans will mean less factory farming which is ruining our planet with excess release of carbon dioxide contributing to global warming, manure from animals causing water pollution and deforestation to make way for crops to feed livestock.