captcass

Sorry, I have no idea what that means......

???????? So how are they going to "eat" me?

Well, folks, I was charged zip except for a $32 reviewer's fee last year. Sadly, many in the science community don't believe life, itself, is a part of the cosmos. They fail to see that the cosmos is observer dependent, even though we accept that in quantum physics. The journal's "Astro-Theology" volume takes the life aspect into consideration. As noted there, Einstein and Newton also thought the universe might be alive itself in some way. The journal does explore many ideas that are not mainstream and, of course, neither am I. I think that exploration is valuable to the scientific community. Sooooooo........no $$$$. No predation, no pay to post. They have been nothing but very decent to me.

No, I say, "DAY"!!!!!! You know, from the BB perspective, you REALLY know your sh*t and can teach it very well. And, yes, you have a lot of patience in that, as Moth noted. I don't want to denigrate you on that and congratulate you on it as it is a lot to learn and understand. Of course you have no final answers, as they are just not there in the BB model, but the real trouble is that you can't seem to be able to see other points of view so as to reject them on THEIR flaws, not just because they aren't BB..... If it ain't BB, you are on it like a nasty, vicious, pit bull, instead of trying to see the other perspective, whether you end up accepting it or not. For this reason you can never accept the correct alternative if it shows up, or even discuss other alternatives. "BB Blind". I think this is why you get so aggressive and, well, .........(fill in word here) Anyway...I don't want you to think I think you don't know your stuff. I just want you to understand that I, too, know that stuff and had to reject it as idiotic and had to move on to find what is in my peer reviewed, published, paper. This is why I get so PO'd when you ask me about when this or that is equal to this or that z, etc......It just shows you haven't read and considered my peer reviewed, published, paper. If you had, you would know z isn't even considered or discussed. It isn't necessary. It presents differently as an effect in time...... I already KNOW what you are trying to tell me. Been there, done that. I have told you this over and again in other threads. You can't seem to accept the fact that someone who thought and understands what you do can now just say it is junk and the perspective from the point of view of effects in time instead makes the whole universe (universal spacetime/quantum continuum) logical, simple and elegant. So, I am not going to continue on with you unless you "address" (I know you can't "answer") the questions I asked about your BB theory, and are willing to continue discussing my peer reviewed, published, paper on its merits and concepts, not on why the BB is right instead. I do not want to debate you on which is right....but will discuss aspects of MY peer reviewed, published, paper with anyone who can refrain from being nasty...

Correct. But it is definitly bed time here. Good night, Mordred. Sweet dreams of quantum continuums! And BEYOOOONNNNDDDDD!

I'm not saying they didn't find an "observationaly" dependent quantum event of mass 26. I'm saying it is obviously not the Higg's as it was neither of the expected values for the Higg's. (and particles do not exist, only events) Don't you ever sleep? By the way, as I told you in other threads, you cannot "educate" me because I already know all you are trying to "teach" me. Been there, done that, and it is, simply put, just crappy bad science based on idiotic premises. Sorry, there is no other way to put it: over 100 years of plain old junk based on incorrect perceptions.

There is no Higg's field. There is no Higg's boson. CERN expected to find either a mass of 15 or 35. They got a 26..... Not conclusive at all, I would say..... All just misinformed rubbish science......based on a non-quantum, "Standard" model of particles that do not, actutally, exist in an evolving quantum continuum except as possible events. It is time, once again, to assume the horizontal. If you want to continue this discussion tomorrow, just try answering, or at least respondng to, my questions. Otherwise.....Borinnnnggg!

Why do you assume YOU are the educator? You are unpublished and.....what??????? You are Soooooo dependent on the THEORIES you accept as FACT to give you security and prominence in the forum. Anything outside that theoretical realm drives you, apparently, nutz. It makes you nasty.

You follow mainstream because it is "mainstream" and you cannot even consider anything outside your comfy little box, where everyone SEEMS to agree on the idiotic crap. You cannot even consider that the "mainstream" might be the vortex carrying your waste down the the toilet into your septic tank. (Good Lord, where are these analogies coming from?!) You see, Mordred, you just admitted your critical flaw......you ONLY follow the mainstream.....What THEY think is more important to you than your own critical thought....

Yes, I know, when you can not come up with a reply, it is boring. Guess what? When YOU can not come up with a reply it is YOU who are boring.... Geeze, Mordred,where are your graphs and words? Aren't you going to "educate me"? Can you answer any of my questions, or not? Never mind. I already know the answer..."NOT".... Your house has no foundation.....

PS: The "Main Stream" is idiotic..absollutely lost since the misintepretaion of Hubble's observations. Trouble is, you follow the blind instead of rejecting the idiotic and trying to think of a rational, logical, explanation that fits in a logical universe.

LOL! MY attitude? Take a look in the mirror my nasty little friend! Lordy, Mordred......How about answering my questions? Just can't do that., can you? Why? Because it is ALL BS! Take note all, the ever present Mordred surrenders because he can't take what he dishes out and can't answer basic questions! The poor guy is just BB Blind! And UN-published.....just a (very sad, hopeless, really) point of view......

Of course not. You cannot address anything honestly that conflicts with your THEORIES and you have never been published.......you are just a bunch of opinions based on unproved, and, frankly, idiotic, totally illogical theories. Otherwise you could answer my questions....... Guess what, my friend, you just surrendered. You can not defend your point of view and just gave up. Why? Because you can not answer my questions and you have never been peer reviewed or published on any of this. Not "worth your bother", indeed, says the "I always have a reply..." Mordred...... Well, Moderator, if the intrepid, ever-present, all-knowing, sacred, Mordred, has surrendered, perhaps this thread should be moved back out of "speculations". The paper is, after all, peer reviewed and published. Or does that not matter here, even if the sacred Mordred surrenders.....?

Well, Mordred, unfortunateley the moderator has now determined this is speculation, even though the paper is peer reviewed and published. I guess there is a "very slight" BB "THEORY" preference on this site. Even published papers that undergo peer review for over 14 months are considered to be just "speculation" here, and YOU, who might be published "one day", and who thinks he is "close" to the solution, demands MORE proof and accuses the author of completely unsubstantiated claims of falsifications due to your own ignorance. So, I didn't want to leave you unanswered. You so DESERVE so much more than that. First of all, publicly accusing someone of "falsification" and "theft" of intellectual property can cost you a hefty sum. It is called "liable" when it is in print. Don't think for a moment I won't find your real identity and sue your butt off. It is time someone tied your nasty tongue, my friend. I am just the guy to do it.......done it before and know the ropes, ins and outs...... hey, Moderator, guess who else is liable! Yes, the site that suborns and publishes the liable! Second, you have not answered, nor can you answer, any of the questions I gave you. You can't answer them because your theory is totally irrational, illogical, BS. I will NOT respond to you anymore until you answer them.... If you want to know my answer to your last ignorant question, READ the PAPER.......something you obviously haven't done if you are still asking these ignorant questions. I'd say that makes you untruthful, as well, as you keep saying you read the paper, when you have obviously not, hence the idiotic, unrelated, questions and responses. You are just a Troll incapable of seeing past his own "THEORIES".....and hell bent on degrading and embarrassing everyone else, peer reviewed and published or not, who has a different theory, peer reviewed and published or not...... You like to think of yourself as "forcing" people to admit their deceptions and "exposing" them as deliberate frauds. Guess what? This makes you the obvious psyco dude. Just an obsessed, mean spirited little troll who is totally incapable of thinking beyond the box..... To YOU, Mordred, the totally idiotic theories are not theories at all, they are FACT. And this makes YOU the idiot who cannot discern fact from theory...... This is where you get to list YOUR peer reviewed papers, Mordred.......?????? Got some or what? No, I guess not. Just another darn Troll who wants to be "someone" "someday" and who's path to glory is the denigration of everyone else who doesn't agree with him.....and his completely nonsensical mainstream theories. Third, your last question to me, after just ignoring my questions to you, is ludicrous as it is based on your flawed BB viewpoint. Just junk science, my friend..... Yet you refuse to address what I have written that provides you your answer, saying I ONLY need to rely on YOU! What an ego! You can't even discuss what I have written (and is peer reviewed and published) as you simply, sadly, just can't picture the concepts others can plainly see....Again, you are BB Blind and just totally OBSESSED with getting everyone in this forum to agree with you...a very nasty little egotistical troll. As you cannot continue this conversation as it relates to my PEER REVIEWED, PUBLISHED, paper, and just want to "educate" me and "convert" me to your idiotic theories, I will no longer be responding to you unless you answer my questions, which you can't, because they have no answers because your "mainstream" stuff is a load of.....(fill in the word of your choice).... You are So ignorant you said a metric IS a tensor! WT*? Sorry, Mordred, I thought you were a decent sort.......Sigh..... Anyone else who wants to continue the discussion is welcomed gladly.

The questions cannot be answered because they are idiotic questions based upon idiotic premises. My paper is based on logically understood effects in time, instead of illogical effects in space, and ties astro and quantum physics together. Those questions are not even asked in my paper. They simply make no sense. The mainstream is all based on the wrong perspective that lead us to .......well, nowhere...... To DM and DE, i.e., "I don't know"...... The questions don't even exist in the universal continuum I describe. There is no need for them. Well, time to assume the horizontal. Good night. Sorry, Mordred: cross post. I was answering Moth. As I said there, it is time to assume the horizontal. My paper answers your questions if you want them tonight. I hope you guys are west coast. I'd hate to think of you doing this at 1 in the morning.....

LOL. Sorry. BHs are MECOs, the center of which is empty space. It is merely a Limit of Relativity, where time appears to stop, just as it does at the cosmological horizon. Your other answers are non-sensical. I.e., they make no real sense. They are the talking points of the BB'ers and just make no sense. Just plain old BS. Totally illogical in a logical universe. Please provide real, logical answers to the questions I posed, not some completely irrational and unproven BS.

I asked you several questions earlier: "Singularity, infinitely accelerating expansion! REALLY? So many interesting questions both of those concepts raise, which can't be answered, and are therefore ignored by mutual agreement as per the Copenhagen convention. What precedes a singularity if everything expands out at an infinitely accelerating expansion? A Big Crunch? Of what? Or is this just it in all of eternity? A 1 shot universe? What is "outside" the "tiny" singularity? Certainly not space.....that would be part of the universe... How can something perceptually infinite appear to be so small? From what perspective would that be? Outside the singularity? Or from inside, so you would see a boundary? What is "outside" the boundary? Where is it expanding into? Because it appears to be infinite it can just do that because infinite is infinite so you are really not adding anything?" You have not answered 1. And what peer reviewed papers have you authored that have been published? Show me the graph, Mordred......

One heck of an ego, Mordred. Please provide the links to your peer reviewed, published papers on any of this. Moth, no he doesn't. He is BB Blind. Well, I guess he has some patience, but, really, I think he is just a lonely troll. Sorry, I "misspelled": a "triadic" would be a metric based on only 3 elements, i.e., X, Y, Z or X, Z, T, as I reduce the Fundamental Metric to in the plane of the disk of a spiral galaxy. It was just meant as a euphemism. Sorry, you seriously lack imagination, Mordred. Think about the fact that your ILk is teaching the young the universe is illogical, instead of logical, but you can't exactly tell them why, but you have a theory, a logical theory, that explains the illogical and makes them, well, just nothing, really, but no one has yet been able to explain and prove it.... They are only a fluke in a meaningless universe. How friggin' sad is that message of hopelessness? Of course, I think most trolls sadly feel that way. ANSWER A SINGLE QUESTION! Hey, MOTH! Don't you think he should answer my simple questions? Who made Him the sole inquisitor? He believes in completely illogical theories he can't answer a single question about! C'mon, Moth, open your eyes and ask him to answer just 1! Or YOU do it! Answer just 1.......

Think about the fact the paper was peer reviewed for over a year before being accepted. Sorry, I'm tired of your ..... st*ff.... If you don't answer my questions above, I will no longer respond to you...as you cannot defend your point of view. Just a troll..... A very droll, troll, to boot!

No. Just saying the two of us alone is greatly diminished by that. How many page reads do you figure our conversation here will get this month? And how many readers will give a sh*t about what we are saying? Answer my above questions. Just 1..... The fact that you won't means you know NOTHING. You only hope to know.. What do you mean, "more than 2 of us"? There are only 2 "following", others are just drop-ins.... Or are people just sitting on the page that keep refreshing it? Are we really that fascinating? Come back and talk to me when you understand the difference between a metric and a tensor.... Geeze, I don't know why I always assume you folks know more than you do....wishful thinking, perhaps?

The journal gets 50,000+ page views a month...

Answer a single question I posted and get off the attack mode.... This is so exciting, all 2 of us are following this!

No. I say it is the BASIS of tensors......Metrics are the bases Tensors are derived from, and not just simply. As you mentioned earlier, over summing was a a major achievement of Einstein.... ANSWER MY QUESTIONS!

Ahhh, now I see the problem.... Einstein's Fundamental METRIC is not a Fundamental TENSOR. Metrics form the quadratic (tridratic, bidratic, monodratic, etc.,) equation that produces the tensors. They "set the stage", so-to-speak. And, once again, I really don't know why you are always in a self-aggrandizing attack mode. Are you a Democrat politician? Is this a competition? Are we "good" vs "evil". ANSWER A SINGLE QUESTION I ASKED YOU! And please include a graph.... I get the feeling you are a lonely troll. You are ALWAYS there. If I start checking topics and threads, I bet you are everywhere. Sorry if you have nothing else to do. Seriously.....I hate seeing suffering. I hate loneliness, like we ALL do. Wonder WHY? But your hostility is uncalled for. Unless you see me as a threat (yes, I have brought Freud into the discussion). I bet the moderator deducts another point.

Ohhhhhh, Mordred! Did you miss the part about this NOT being about TENSORS...... OF ANY SORT????? Whew. Sorry for shouting.......it really takes it out of me....... I'm sorry, Mordred. I suggest you re-read the paper until you see it has nothing to do with what you are talking about. Of course we all think once we understand something that it is easy to understand, and that is definitely me, but it did take the jouranal over a year to consider my paper.... You are simply not hearing me. Other Bangers can see I have a point of view that cannot be demonstrably faulted, something you have yet to even try to do, which is why I was published by Bangers. You want to attack ME. You say there are insuffisencies that do not satisfy you yet, and accuse me of despicable intent and behavior, when, after over a year of review, the journal accepted it. Perhaps you just need some time, too. Get nice or get lost. It is I enlightening YOU!