Jump to content

Beshears Brad

Members
  • Posts

    4
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Beshears Brad

  1. If ISIS gets defeated, another group will emerge just the same. The reason. Three little verses in the Quran. 4:95.....8:12....& 9:29. The only way. Would be to convince Muslims as a whole to agree to change the wording so it cannot be interpreted the way moderate Muslims say that radicals mis interpret. Also moderates will argue that smithing of the heads of infidels and it is the right for Muslims to fight infidels, which is what you will read in these three verses, comes from reference to a war that happened thousands of years ago. And that Allah gives them the right to defend themselves and shield their kind from anything not like them so their kind aren't corrupted. That's a load, because it doesn't say anything about that war in the verses, it only states what Muslims must do. So moderate or radical, the words are ment to be interpreted the way ISIS puts them into action. Only the blind an lame can be free from these duties, all are urged t take action because the quaran says hthey will be the closest to Allah. That's all one would need when being brainwashed to be live this. The only difference between the moderates and the radicals are the radicals are willing to put the words into action and the moderates will only cheer them on. But, Muslims are speaking out against ISIS and saying they aren't of Islam. They are half right, ISIS came from Islam and graduated into something far worse but like the saying goes, he who is the enemy of my enemy is my friend. And that is why moderate Muslims secretly agree with what ISIS does but Not everything Isis does.
  2. Also, I may have misconceived the multiverse theory. I am under the impression that that theory is made from what we know abo quantum mechanics. Such as the entanglement. But,mo know that the entanglement is really just referencing particles that are connected. Not necessarily between parallel universes but not excluding that fact. But if the theory could be proven, I see entanglement being part of the proof. And the name of the video is.....the universe: collection. It's a series. It's also on Netflix. If you are able to watch it it's episode, 3 called microscopic universe. If you can, please watch this and translate it to me, I may have confused some concept here. Like I said I'm new.
  3. To swanont. What I do know is this concept is new. But I have read a little bit about it before, my question comes from a video I've recently watched. I don't remember the name at this time but I will post it for you. I do understand the misrepresentation of the entanglement. The multiverse theory is just a theory. But supposedly, because the entanglement is proven, if the multiverse theory could be proven, the entanglement could have something to do with it. I just don't get how the multiverse theory suggests exact opposites of ourselves because it's not about us as a whole, we are made of millions on particles, so it would be about each particle and where they are positioned between the 2 universes. Unless there would be a way to calculate the exact position of particles in both universes. So all my particles here would be mirrored there. But how to calculate??? With out that information, in my mind I see each particle to have an unpredictable position in the alternate universe. Therefore, all my particle here could possibly be assembled together there to make my duplicate and or they could be scattered because everything is made of these subatomic particles. So one of my particles here could be part of a tree there while another of my particles, that corespondent with the others her, could be part of something else there.but still be entangled to each other. IM not that educated in this, I'm actually just starting to grasp the concept of quantum mechanics, physics....ect. Also, I'm new to how forums work, so I don't know if I'm doing this right. I hit a yellow up arrow that puts a 1 next to others comments. I thought it was like Facebook and that means you like the comment??? Lol
  4. I wanted some insight on mmy question, i joined a forum just for that, sorry if im off subject......... So im a newbie. My question is about the quantum entangelment and how it corelates to the multivers theory. the theory of a parallel universe does make sence to me, what doesnt make sence is that there is an exact opposite of me, in that universe. the quantum entagelment shows that 2 particles can be connected even at a vast distance and each particle does the oposite or an alternative to what the other particl does. So, since my body is made up of millions and millions of these particles, what explains how my particles are assembled together in the paralell universe. I mean, if each of my particles has an entagled particle in the other universe how can the assumption be made that all those particles would be assembeld together to form a duplicate of me, or clone if you will. I mean, what if one of my particles if part of a tree in the other universe while another one of my particles could be part of an animal. Is there some kind of code that says each particle assembled together here will be assemblesd with all the other corrisponing particles that make me here, but in the paralell?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.