Adam

NO, something like this will never be officially accepted, even if there's most legitimate experiment to prove it. Because of religious and Pollitical control, If people suddenly realize of out of body it will make them think of "souls" "afterlife" as far as i checked, That would be disadvantagous to government.

a well respected tv channel, admired by many people who are interested in science and nature.

HOw else do you want to prove OOBE, is there any other way? idont think so.

I haven't mentioned anything about the remote viewing actual experiments and i'm not going to but on disocvery channel i rememer a show about it where they tested person peforming out of body experience, they wrote anumber on piece of paper and put it somwhere remotely, told him where it was. The results:

He got out of that state and told the number.

Originally posted by Giles

Your brain?

Ruthless swine

Notice how i am in Psuedoscience and Metaphysics aspect of science.

information*

Originally posted by fafalone

Good. Shut up till then.

giving up???

I already got my information.

Originally posted by fafalone

Why don't you try it? Go shove an electrode into your brain.

I tryed it, I even tryed telepathy 7 times, it WORKED ONCE.

But why don't you try it >????????????????????????

S C E P T I C:zzz:

Dreams have purpose, They review events from your life, or just a "last week" pile, mixedup togther, and your brain makes sense

But ASTRAL PROJECTIONS DOES NOT MAKE SENSE from that perspective. there is no reason why our brain should generate such thoughts

Besides, i've never had an OOBE that resembled a dream , it was all making sense, i was where i was, i dind't see anything that i woudln't see normally.

Originally posted by fafalone

Out of body experiences are purely physiological; we can even induce them in animals. It's nothing more than a vivid dream in a particular area of the brain.

it's because of people like you, people never try things for themselves.

Originally posted by fafalone

Out of body experiences are purely physiological; we can even induce them in animals. It's nothing more than a vivid dream in a particular area of the brain.

You try it then.

No one will give you that evidence you have go find it for yourself, It's well supressed. But someone has to cause leaks

that's what I realized 3 years ago, and then all the knowledge came with it.

Don't listen to others just try it for yourself, Then draw conclusions. I gurantee to you you'l have different opinions about things when you actually try them.

If i didn't peform OUT OF BODY, i woudln't be here writing about it.

I did see myself lying in bed while being out of body once, And i had full control over what i was doing while out, so i dramatically decided to see myself, and there I was. , so i got scared of seperation and "jumped" back in myself, but didn't actually peform the jump , thought about it and I was back.

This is why i support the theory of remote viewing, telepathy, clairvoiance,

ever been to a psychic ? probally not, because people tell you it's a hoax, but you should trying one out, even if it costs money,

I gurantee to you she'll tell you things about you that only you know, your deepest secrets, HOW ? Reading your mind.

Heh i wouldn't be suprised if i went seeking information and found , THE 10 Comandments PLATES , FOUND AND CARBON DATED. but that's just waste of time.

Originally posted by fafalone

And where's the scientific evidence that happened?

and where's the scientific evidence that it didn't happen ???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

The arc of noah, well proved. Why would noah meeting GOD/ALIENS not happen ?????????????????????????

Tired of arguging with me over remote viewing, so now attacking my personal aspects of life ???

I can wait a month or two.

Originally posted by Sayonara³

Writing something down does not make it true.

that's not what moses thought as GOD wrote 10 amendments.

"How to request information under the FOIA

Write a letter or send a FAX to the above address stating that the request is being made under FOIA. For the quickest handling, mark both your letter and the envelope"Freedom of Information Act Request". Although you do not have to give a record's name or title, you should be as specific as possible to assist the agency in locating the records. The request should be as precise and narrow as possible. A request may only seek records that are in existence at the time the FOIA request is received, and may not require that new records be created in response to the request. As a general rule, you are not required to state the reasons why you are making the request. You may do so if you think it might help the agency locate the records. Be sure to provide your telephone number, mailing address, and a Fax number, if available, so that employees may contact you if needed.

"

no it is not.

Originally posted by fafalone

The Bible is NOT an accurate historic account of events.

 

 

No.

The arc seems pretty accurate to me, Maybe i should go to Turkey and look at it with "scientific eye'

I tryed it, well worked. You should do.

get the same material from here, but you have to be a u.s. citizen:

Central Intelligence Agency

Information and Privacy Coordinator

Washington D.C., 20505

Other than that , this information is pretty declassified, atleast to most psychics that are in this field of studies. I'm sure you could find same stuff on internet easily

Thats what i posted at some point in part 2, obiously you haven't been following. Notice: im the only one who uses information buddy, hundreds of people do.

NICE TRY attempting in degrading me

[/img]

[/img]

[/img]

[/img] [/img] [/img]

Please bear in mind that statements not supported by logical, scientific or historical methodology are not grounded in an epistemology that sceptics (you seem to be confusing scepticism with dogmatic denial by the way) are likely to accept as reliable.

C.I.A. is a reliable source of information.

Nice response time.

Same way i know of the ark of noah (you don't) , same way i found out about remote viewing.