

Wild Cobra
Senior Members-
Content Count
161 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Community Reputation
-71About Wild Cobra
-
Rank
Baryon
Profile Information
-
Location
Portland, Oregon
-
Favorite Area of Science
various
-
Reaction of Earth to Changes in Total Solar Irradiance
Wild Cobra replied to Wild Cobra's topic in Climate Science
I gave it to you. It doesn't matter to me what you believe of it. -
Reaction of Earth to Changes in Total Solar Irradiance
Wild Cobra replied to Wild Cobra's topic in Climate Science
It most certainly can if I were to use daily, or even hourly values instead of annual. However, the percentages would be smaller. The only claim I am making is that if there is a response, that if slow enough, can account for solar effect of warming into this century. I don't know if my low values of 3% or 4% is in the ballpark. I could be off. What annoys me is the certainty by you and others that it is so much higher. Maybe I incorrectly assumed what you meant. Sorry if so. Do you claim radioactive decay is linear as will, since it consistently reduced by 50% over a giv -
Reaction of Earth to Changes in Total Solar Irradiance
Wild Cobra replied to Wild Cobra's topic in Climate Science
I'm going to start ignoring everyone who starts off by misrepresenting my claims. Care to be serious? -
Reaction of Earth to Changes in Total Solar Irradiance
Wild Cobra replied to Wild Cobra's topic in Climate Science
Then tell me what you need me to elaborate on instead of incorrect assumption. When I see an argument against an incorrect assumption, I think you are building a straw man to tear down. I see. Even though there is no conclusive way to quantify the effect of CO2, you expect solar to be? What is not clear about linking the SORCE data set and specifying annual? Do you see why I get so annoyed with you guys? The excel formulas are very simple. From the start, I take the 1610 TSI value for both the TSI and equalized values. In more recent spreadsheets, I changed the results -
Reaction of Earth to Changes in Total Solar Irradiance
Wild Cobra replied to Wild Cobra's topic in Climate Science
This isn't a science class. I'm not going to explain the basic sciences of spectral depths of shortwave, convection, conduction, etc. If these basics are not already understood, I would be wasting my time. As for CO2, it has effect too, and I am not quantifying a temperature value by anything solar or greenhouse gasses. Once again, I was only showing a mechanism that shows longer times involved in how the sun can influence climate. Why are you all making more of it than what it is? -
Reaction of Earth to Changes in Total Solar Irradiance
Wild Cobra replied to Wild Cobra's topic in Climate Science
You guys are impossible. Look at what I initially responded to. iNow states: I reply with a clarification, specifying the coupling between the solar-ocean-atmosphere, and never claim it to be more than one part of the whole: What type of bias does it take to continually twist what another says? Is it your method of confirmation bias? I am not specifying any particular period of time only stating that a annual value of equalization percentage for annual data conforms with both previous knowledge I have accumulated over more than a decade, and even with Hansen's 60% statement -
Reaction of Earth to Changes in Total Solar Irradiance
Wild Cobra replied to Wild Cobra's topic in Climate Science
I simply used the same excel sheet and changed to a two state for illustration purposes, that it is exponential. Sorry, I thought that would be obvious. I'm not writing a thesis or paper to be peer reviewed. Why complain about simplicity that I'm pretty sure everyone understands the intent? Is complete refinement necessary for purposes of illustration how something progresses? I have wanted to use daily and uncorrected TSI values, but couldn't find any. There is something like a 7% change in value from the eccentricity of the earths orbit alone, but all I can find are norma -
Claims require evidence: Wild Cobra Edition
Wild Cobra replied to John Cuthber's topic in Suggestions, Comments and Support
That there is spiteful bias. Anyone who disagree with consensus is treated so much different than those making looser statements that do support consensus. Now that I got my graph in on the other post, and said my piece. I just might not come back again. I'm tired of this "clique" like environment. -
Reaction of Earth to Changes in Total Solar Irradiance
Wild Cobra replied to Wild Cobra's topic in Climate Science
I gave a link to my formulation. It's exponential. If I do a single state change with my formulation we get this: 90% is at 55 years. Another thing when speaking of equalization, it is rarely stated at what percentage. One of Hansen's papers... says something to the effect that 60% of the equalization occurs in... I think 20 to 30 years. This too, matches. I haven't found that paper as I looked, but there is something to that effect. Any time equalization is mentioned, a percentage of equalization needs to be stated with it, else it's meaningless. After all, it takes infin -
Claims require evidence: Wild Cobra Edition
Wild Cobra replied to John Cuthber's topic in Suggestions, Comments and Support
I think you gave two examples just fine to support my contention. In the first "this," I stated what I thought I read by saying "If I read that correctly..." I then asked questions about it. In the second "this," I stated that some of this was very old. I used a 10 year reference. Can you find material from 10 years back with ease? And should I when I was being asked to source an opinion in a thread called "Who here is a global warming skeptic?" I have been hounded at every turn for any little reason. In a recent post in another thread, you assume incorrect facts and accuse me- 12 replies
-
-2
-
Reaction of Earth to Changes in Total Solar Irradiance
Wild Cobra replied to Wild Cobra's topic in Climate Science
Why are you assuming? I never indicated a linear response. Did you look at my formulation? Since when does 0.0402 x 55 = 1? -
Reaction of Earth to Changes in Total Solar Irradiance
Wild Cobra replied to Wild Cobra's topic in Climate Science
I don't discount the two month apparent lag at all. We all witness that the two annual solaces are late June and late December, but the temperature peaks are usually August/September or January/February. I am simply saying that there are likely more changes, that are slower at responding as well. Now I have complained about using blogs, but in a short time frame, I didn't find what I was looking for except for this: http://www.skepticalscience.com/Climate-Change-The-40-Year-Delay-Between-Cause-and-Effect.html In this, there is a 40 year lag claimed and accepted by those of Skep -
At the risk of responding to a moderator thread, I would be glad to have a proper thread to disuss this topic, without the fear of suspension. By all means Imatfaal. I welcome a proper thread.
-
Claims require evidence: Wild Cobra Edition
Wild Cobra replied to John Cuthber's topic in Suggestions, Comments and Support
I was taken out in my opinion for what ever angle I could be, because I can threaten consensus. Once I said i would show an example once I saw one again, I was hounded and hounded. I was baited into that suspension for holding firm. How about we discuss the science instead of such things as you bring up? Don't you get it? My viewpoint of science has been censored. If I'm not careful, I will be suspended again. Maybe banned. Strange... How about responding to my viewpoint on science instead. Do you agree or disagree that my methodology for the graph I made has merit? Maybe not th- 12 replies
-
-1
-
Claims require evidence: Wild Cobra Edition
Wild Cobra replied to John Cuthber's topic in Suggestions, Comments and Support
Suspended at least. That's how you guys set it up. You know the rules and how the moderators respond. I was suspended for a week for not digging into a claim I made before. I said I would provide it the next time it presented itself. My initial claim was not to believe any blog, including those from skeptics. It snowballed into a suspension for me of a week: http://www.scienceforums.net/topic/29763-bannedsuspended-users/?p=838272 My offense was not allowing the thread to be sidetracked farther, and refusing repeated demands. Now here we are again...- 12 replies
-
-1