anonymousone

basically part of my theory is that magnets contain vast ammounts of orbital energies and this energy can be tapped with what i call accelerated electromagnetic induction batteries. and i think this is the next level of energy technology.

#55 search youtube for "how to build free energy magnetic motor" this "magic" isnt mystical its all science. and i have no idea why the links dont work cuz i double checked them.

math is on the way.

www.youtube.com/watch?v=wn1wnkm2_zc what i saw worked like this except the spinning part had coils on it that produced electricity as the coils moved through the magnetic field. and this electricity was used to make the system spin faster and "generate"even more electricity and spin. and this seems to work magically but it isnt magic electrons come from the magnets orbital energy.

so even if im wrong about magnets transfering their orbital electric energy during electromagnetic induction thats just one tiny modification ill make to my theory and itll be changed so that the orbital energy arround and in magnets doesnt transfer like i originally thought it did. orbital energy will still cause magnetism according to my theory and the same is true about gravity(dark energy forces) what ive seen with my own eyes is a "free" energy system that runs on magnets and it generates enough energy to keep itself producing energy perpetually. and theres videos im going to go find thatre free energy magnetic motors which seem to do magic but it isnt mystical at all because i know whats going on.

this explanation cant be correct because the physical ammount of electrons in the coil/wire increases somehow or else electromagnetic inuction wouldnt seem to generate electricity like voltage to fuel lights or voltage to fuel a pendulum with coils attatched to it which moves through a magnetic field to produce those volts. and this cycle as mentioned before can go on perpetually seemingly generating free energy. but i theorize that this energy comes from energy orbiting a magnet which makes more sense in my oppinion. i dont believe magic or lack of explanations cut it. also again mainstream physics doesnt account for where the volts and electrons come from during electromagnetic induction and my theory on electromagnetism does. im sure youll avoid my point again and say all the volts come from the coils which is obviously nonsense.

but youre completely avoiding the logic i use to backup my ideas and thats because you cant discredit my ideas directly. take on my ideas directly and prove im stupid this way instead if you can. somebody do this at least so i can know my ideas are dumb too. and plus why does whether or not i can use a calculator even matter?

if this was what was happening then why does an electric generator seem to generate volts of electrons which dont seem to exist before hand they had to have come from somewhere. www.youtube.com/watch?v=vwidzjjd8o and is the energy being put into moving the coil less in some cases than the voltage produced. did u know its possible to make it so electromagnetic induction fuels electromagnetic induction(movement of a pendulum with wire coils on it through a magnetic field) and this technology seems to magically generate electricity which isnt really whats happening i dont think since magic doesnt make sense.

mainstream science has no explanation at all to explain where an electric generator gets its electricity from that it supposedly generates. which is why they supposedly mystically work. and this lack of an explanation is completely unacceptable since theres no logic or math involved to back it up. and ull insult me and say im being a strawman even though i provide logic for this and am working on the mathematical equations now just like you all want. so dont be rediculous and say im being a strawman when ive worked for 7 years on my model/theory also. thanks

i dont need to be able to calculate the ammount of fusion in the universe except for my math equation im working on. how does me not knowing something about carbon 14 mean my theory is incorrect anyway. also this doesnt prove anything really important all it is is you trying to demonstrate how i dont know one thing to try and discredit me and this one thing isnt critical to my theory anyway. my theory accounts for larger patterns and observations that mainstream physicists theories dont so my theory is better. the thing about science is that theres always room for more accurate logic and math and both are important to have. so with this said i dont expect anybody to consider my theory/model fact without accurate math and logic so dont think im being rediculous and dont believe anything or anyone unless you can prove certain stuff with your own research.

actually electric generators dont magically form electricity like current science says. logically this energy comes from the magnets because energy orbits the magnets i think. and this is evidence im correct because the energy comes from somewhere. fishnets dont generate fish and electric generators dont generate electricity. and this all supports my theory on dark energy forces too which accounts for phenomenah like stars cores shrinking without any magic. also the galaxy rotational curve is no longer magically happening according to my theory. and wheres the math and logic the standard model needs to explain this stuff? this kind of stuff needs logic and math to support it with zero stupid mystical/magical stuff and thats what im supplying yet somehow my lack of more evidence is proof im wrong supposedly according to some of you here. which is rediculous.

pointing out that i lack enough evidence to be convincing doesnt prove im incorrect by the way so you can pretend it does if you want. science is about facts though. anyway i dont need to provide math to explain my logic because its so simple. math is required for complex stuff and my theory on everything is very simple fortunately and doesnt include magic unlike current science and spirituality do. just wait until i make math equations that prove my model is correct. im sure it can but i havent done that yet so ill have to research and theorize orbital energy more especially the numerical values associated with dark energies force inducing properties. im definitely going work as hard as i can on the math losing sleep and weight as i do so because i do realize how important it is to have. but when you all suggest my ideas are wrong because i havent supplied this yet that upsets me because thats just not true.

sorry about the quotes not working im using an xbox 360 and cant control paste. i will reply by using three dashes after somebodies statement.

---e=mc2 ---again evidence that magnets contain orbital electric energy is that electromagnetic induction batteries get their energy from somewhere(the magnets) instead of thinking energy particles magically appear to form the voltage. i dont believe in magic as you can tell. ---im going to say my hypothesis once and its that not enough orbital energy is taken from the magnets to weaken them enough. and i predict that when i make more powerful and effective electromagnetic induction technology it will be noticed that magnets weaken as they lose energy via em.i. actually you are not correct. evidence for my hypothesis/theory youre refering to is the wave particle duality nature of matter. because miniature universes doing bigbangs and big crunches over and over are standing waves. and these have a frequency just like a wave and a shape and spot just like a particle. and every intelligent person knows about this wave particle duality nature of matter which my model matches exactly. thanks for making this so easy btw.

im going to add that according to my model/theory during high speed particle physics energy from the collisions converts to mass and the quarks and hadrons that appear there are miniature universes which contain atoms inside of them too. so just because quarks exist as particles at a high speed particle collisions this doesnt mean that neutrons and protons are made of quarks according to my model/theory because protons and neutrons are miniature universes that do big bangs and big crunches over and over as mentioned before.

well i think that when mass coalesces dark energy in that mass somehow goes to orbit that object/body as a whole. and this dark energy in the mass can be released during fusion for example in stars where itll increase that stars gravity/antigravity power. so in other words earth gets its dark energy from its own mass because that mass has coalesced. just like how coalesced mass formed hydrogen clouds and stars early on in the universal cycle....also you say that all galaxies are moving away from each other at the same rate even though theres clusters of galaxies and they form all kinds of shapes...and if this is sorta true then thats because theyre all about the same size fusing about the same ammount of matter every day. and so it would be expected that a relatively equal ammount of universal expansion take place between all galaxies and galaxy clusters...if indeed my theory is true that universal expansion is caused by fusion/dark energy associated with galaxies.

my hypothesis is that these variables i mentioned here are connected mathematically and this is because dark energy is released during fusion where it then causes gravity, accelerating universal expansion, and the galaxy rotational curve...

so this got me thinking outside of the box about math which is great because i consider this something gained from this conversation...im going to make a math equation which shows correlations exist between fusion ammounts in the universe, net gravity strength in the universe, the total ammount of universal expansion thats taken place, and the galaxy rotational curve along with some other variables hopefully... the goal is to show mathematical connections between these variables and dark energy to prove dark energy vortex configurations(orbital energy) causes gravity and to prove that forces can be made by orbital energies so that my hypothesis/theory about electromagnetism is also strengthened. to support my theory on everything. now i need to teach myself more about math.

while i cant simulate every single particle i can make each aspect of our understanding of the universe more logical than now and i do this with metaphors diagrams graphs and rationals for why something is more logical. not everything is math when it comes to problem solving anything including math although i do want math to backup my rationals because math cant be refuted. thats just one piece of the puzzle because math needs to be about stuff that makes the most logical sense.

-energy is released during fision when bonds are violently broken because energy forms bonds and energy is required to break those bonds i think so we agree. and heat energy is needed to fuse atoms together which releases even more energy and this released energy comes from somewhere. according to my theory this energy comes from the energy that was being used to hold two nuclie together which is more than whats required to hold one nucleus together and so the leftover extra energy is released as heat light and dark energy. -there is evidence to support this idea that im not going to present again sir. it is up to you whether you consider this conclusive or not though. -if somebody measures a magnets strength according to my theory the magnet will weaken more and more the longer it is used in electromagnetic induction because those volts didnt come from nowhere they came from the magnets energy configuration that causes magnetic forces and this weakening is probably very slight. -i think ill predict some data correctly but theres so much data thats been collected and no theories to match all recorded data which is a major problem that needs a major answer which i think is valuable

i think during fusion when a bond is formed less energy is needed to hold the particles together and so extra energy is released. energy that was being used to crush two seperate nuclei together is more than whats required to hold together one larger nucleus. also during electromagnetic induction the magnet loses strength because the energy that was orbiting the magnet generating forces there is gone. while the electrons can be measured in volts according to my theory. and alot of the predictions this theory can make arent really determinable such as the size of the universe being symetrical to protons and neutrons. with this said though my theory indicates that there will be anomalies in how stars orbit galaxies because of how the dark energy configurations cause gravity and repulsive forces which cause universal expansion...and these anomalies are known as the galaxy rotational curve. the best way to visualize this is to imagine that orbiting stars are inflating balloons swirling arround a supermassive blackhole. and these inflating balloons represent the increasing size of the dark energy configurations that cause gravity and antigravity simultaneously. in other words what is causing the galaxy rotational curve is also causing accelerating universal expansion. my theory matches data more than it predicts you all see?

the dark energy configurations that orbit galaxies according to my theory are massive and that's how they generate all the forces that smash and repel matter. But its all dark energy moving the matter and how the dark energy is arranged is what matters, not how space and time curves. Technically, its possible to harvest dark energy and use it as a way to travel via gravity and this would be a way to go millions of miles per hour possibly because u wouldn't get crushed by g's. Also, I think that dark energy does stick to massive objects and cause gravity, why this is could be due to some kind of dark energy particle properties im not familiar with because it hasn't been studied yet. It seems though that energy orbits and makes force vectors in iron filings. So dark energy probably orbits massive cosmological objects for the same reason. strong force = gravity inside of protons and neutrons weak force = big bangs in protons and neutrons gravity = orbital energy magnetic forces = orbital energy excellent questions by the way sir.

i think that the energy that causes gravity is mainly produced in stars and blackholes. But when a hydrogen bomb goes off some dark energy is released for example and so gravity increases because that energy somehow incorperates itself into orbiting arround the cosmological object it was near. also, I think that since energy forms bonds and dark energy causes gravity, that the moon is held in orbit by this energy and it encapsulates earth and the moon at once. And u say how come we dont fly off earth? well thats because somehow this invisible energy that orbits in a spherical configuration makes matter move from areas of higher dark energy density to the lower areas. like a slope the slope being lower areas have less dark energy in that area of space. Also i think this energy orbits faster than light because that way it can organize galaxy clusters. Yes u say gravity attracts that is true, and the way dark energy can cause attraction(gravity) and repulsion(antigravity universal expansion) is that it orbits stars and galaxies in spherical configuration shapes. And these shapes gain size over time like balloons inflating and this pushes objects apart. While at the center of these spherical dark energy configurations the energy is arranged in a way that causes matter to be crushed. hope this helps

ahh i see i look forward to debating and defending my ideas in a way that isnt agressive or rude. because if somebody can prove my ideas are stupid somehow ide like them do so so i can modify my theory and/or come to the conclusion that its bunk. thanks